October 2007
S M T W T F S
« Sep   Nov »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Follow PeoriaChronicle on Twitter

Recent Comments

  • Precinct Committeeman: The community of Peoria County did support the ballot measure. Below that level of...
  • C. J. Summers: I was thinking, how about the Bradley Jaywalker? The mascot could unexpectedly cross the middle of the...
  • Charlie: What if they stay with the Indian theme, but make it more politically correct and reflect...
  • New Voice: Precinct, Very true! But……… when was the last time we heard anything about Bellwood [or...
  • Precinct Committeeman: NV wrote “…remember….. nothing is permanent!” except the continued presence...
  • Karrie E. Alms: DP: Treat people with respect and not name call. Trust is earned not given as stated by Jack Fought...
  • Wesmess: My family has enjoyed traveling to outlying cities to enjoy the IMAX experience. If it does not come into...
  • New Voice: I don’t know why you guys are worried. According to Peo Proud and Peoria Committeeman, the YES vote...
  • Emtronics: The Bradley Braves Councilmen! The Bradley Women’s Braves Councilwomen! All you need is a guy in...
  • strong1: just curious: I am not sure. But I think pretty far back Just be sure to request them from the server. Does...
  • Sharon Crews: strong1–You noticed that, too–evidently Edison doesn’t supply all the extras at...
  • The Mouse: Yea, anp, except this dodo is never going to secure all the needed funding. The deficits it will run will...
  • just curious: How far back can the D150 server retrieve e-mails for a FOIA request?
  • strong1: Why on the board mtg. agenda is there an action item to purchase SCIENTIFIC LEARNING CORPORATION FAST...
  • shankappotamus: Sharon–I bet you could write a a book about the changes that have occurred during the past 43...

Categories

Reader poll: Throw the bum out?

Speaking of the Chicago Tribune, they’ve published a declaration of all the reasons Gov. Rod Blagojevich should be thrown out of office. In conjunction, they’re also gathering comments from readers (until 2 p.m. today) on whether the state constitution should be amended in 2008 to allow us to recall the governor before his term is up in 2010.

What do you think? Should we pass the necessary legislation to allow us to recall Blago and get him out of office as soon as possible?

15 comments to Reader poll: Throw the bum out?

  • David P. Jordan

    Yes.

  • Mahkno

    A recall provision would be good.

  • Karrie E. Alms

    Let’s not stop with the governor. How about broadening the scope by giving the voter the ability to recall any elected offical for dereliction of duty?

  • I agree with Karrie, the people should have the option to be able to remove any and all elected officials. Let’s amend the state constitution, but say no to a convention.

  • New Vision

    Would this ‘amendment’ include any Peoria Republicans? I would like to ‘recall’ Shock before he even makes it to congress. Can we send him back to college?

  • James Lansberry

    Isn’t there already a way to impeach the governor?

    I’d like to see him go as much as anyone, but until we either vote him out or go through the impeachment process I’m a bit wary of changing the constitution on this without at least a failed attempt at using the means already there.

  • Mahkno

    Impeachment would require the cooperation of the legislature. It is a legislative removal. Recall originates directly from the citizens and is put to a popular vote by the public, bypassing the legislature. Recall is removal by the citizenry.

  • Billy Dennis

    We already have a way to kick Blago out of office. It’s called “an election.” We had an opportunity to remove him from office back in 2006, but we chose to not do do because he was able to prove to us that she happened to be a republican at the same time George Ryan was. Besides, she looked funny in those campaign ads.

  • mdd!

    Yes. The sooner, the better.

  • The Mouse

    Billy’s solution (an election) won’t work for the reasons he alludes to – voters don’t get much of a choice. Perhaps we should reform the election process by offering “none of the above” as a choice, and forcing the parties to nominate someone else if “none of the above” wins?? Better yet, we could get rid of the parties. Then many (granted, not all) in those mindless crowds that would (a) vote for the Democrat if he/she were a dead skunk, or (b) vote for the Republican if he/she were a dead skunk, would have to educate themselves on the issues or stay home.

  • [...] The editors of the Chicago Tribune were apparently stunned by the response they received when they asked their readers if they believed that Governor Blagojevich should be recalled. I thought I might ask my readers what they thought. My opinion can be found in C.J.’s comment section. [...]

  • [...] The Mouse: Billy’s solution (an election) won’t work for the reasons he alludes to – voters don’t… [...]

  • The ability to recall a politician would be spectacular. Karrie nailed it on the head, but I would remove the ‘dereliction of duty’ and replace it with ‘for any reason.’ It would be nice to vacate the Gov.’s office of Mr. Blago.

  • Ben

    The law as proposed needs work though. It takes 12 % of the last vote to remove the Governor, but 20 % to remove a legislator of judge. I think it should be the same for everyone.