Is there no one in the Peoria Board of Education’s first district that will challenge Martha Ross for her seat on the school board? Clare Jellick says there isn’t.
Daily Archives: November 9, 2007
On the Agenda: Peoria Urban Living Initiative
On the City Council’s consent agenda next Tuesday is a proposal to focus the City’s Six Sigma program on attracting homeowners back to the Heart of Peoria. “The City proposes creating a joint study group that will uncover existing programs and examine other possible methods of increasing middle class home ownership in the Heart of Peoria.” Included in the “study group” would be representatives from major employers and a couple city council members appointed by the mayor. It doesn’t appear from the agenda item that the Heart of Peoria Commission will be included in this effort, despite its focus on the Heart of Peoria area.
Here’s the full text of the agenda item:
AGENDA DATE REQUESTED: November 13,2007
ACTION REQUESTED: RECEIVE AND FILE A PLAN TO ENGAGE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE CITY AND MAJOR EMPLOYERS IN AND NEAR DOWNTOWN TO EXAMINE WAYS TO INCREASE MIDDLE CLASS INVESTMENT AND HOME OWNERSHIP IN THE HEART OF PEORIA.
BACKGROUND: The City has been working to revitalize and rebuild the Heart of Peoria. The City has created the Heart of Peoria plan, the Renaissance Park program, an Enterprise Zone and nine Tax increment Financing Districts to lead this effort. Currently, the City also sponsors a program to provide lower interest rates for home buyers, and provides down payment assistance for first home buyers.
However, stabilizing the Heart of Peoria is also in the interest of Peoria employers within this area. These employers are seeking to improve the areas around their operations and are looking to be more competitive in attracting “creative class” employees. The City proposes creating a joint study group that will uncover existing programs and examine other possible methods of increasing middle class home ownership in the Heart of Peoria. Preliminarily, we have identified four major employers for this effort: Caterpillar, Bradley University, Methodist Medical Center and OSF. Other groups, such as District 150 and the Chamber of Commerce, could also be considered.
This study group would be comprised of two parts:
- A policy group, comprised of a senior leader from each employer, as selected by that employer. The Mayor would select one or more Councilpersons to chair this policy group. The policy group would examine the high-level issues involved and give direction to the staff to pursue options.
- A technical group, tasked with investigating the issues identified by the policy group. This group will be led by Christopher Setti, City of Peoria 6 Sigma Black Belt. Each participating employer would be asked to name an employee (preferably a Black Belt if available) to work with Mr. Setti. Broadly, this group will be determining who the customer of the end product might be; what motivates their home-buying decisions; and what programs could be established [to] increase homeownership in the target area.
The working title of this project is the Peoria Urban Living Initiative. The intent of the program would be to conserve and revitalize our neighborhoods in the Heart of Peoria, while helping our employers recruit and retain valuable employees. While the effort will be guided by the policy group, some of the areas of exploration might be:
- The size and scope of down-payment assistance (and other homeownership initiatives) in the target area by both the City and employers.
- How taxes can be reduced or mitigated in order to stimulate investment.
- The best use of the City’s “bond volume cap” in encouraging homeownership.
- Other initiatives, such as Neighborhood LEEDs, that might raise the profile of older neighborhoods.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Improved homeownership in the Heart of Peoria will help to increase revenues to all taxing authorities through higher assessed property values.
NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNS: Neighborhood leaders have consistently been in favor of greater homeownership rates. The technical group will seek their input in this initiative.
IMPACT IF APPROVED: The study group will be formed and the issue will be thoroughly examined. The result will be a set of recommendations to the City Council and partner employers about steps that can be taken to improve homeownership.
IMPACT IF DENIED: The City will continue to offer its incentive programs and employers will likely not address the issue.
ALTERNATIVES: None.
RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. VISION: WE HAVE A HEALTHY, THRIVING ECONOMY. GOAL: A. Provide an economic environment that supports existing and new businesses.
Peoria’s commitment to the museum so far: $16-26 million
Lakeview Museum Board President Jim Vergon said at last night’s museum presentation to the Peoria County Board, “Over the past four years, our project has received $6 million towards the $30 million goal for public funding, leaving a $24 million gap.” He said this included federal, state, and local support. Later, Caterpillar Vice President Sid Banwart drove home the point: “We’ve looked at a lot of museum complexes around the country and around the Midwest, and we have not been able to find any that were built without substantial public funding,” he said.
What you need to know about these statements is that these museum officials are talking about cash funds. They’re not talking about other benefits such as land use, TIF benefits, etc. In fact, the City of Peoria has provided what I would consider “substantial” public investment in the museum. How much public investment? The city provided these numbers:
The following provides the City’s commitment, as approved by the Mayor and Council, to this project. Please note this analysis assumes a 2009 completion date and does not include federal grant funding.
Land value (65% of $10 million)1 $ 6,500,000 TIF through 20212 $ 7,525,892 Change in grade of Water Street $ 2,600,000 Sub-Total $16,625,892 Potential Extension of TIF3 $ 9,408,615 Total $ 26,034,507 1Based on appraised value.
2Assumes completion of the Caterpillar Center and Regional Museum by 2009.
3The original agreement proposes an expansion of the length of the TIF. This assumes the TIF is extended 15 years from the current expiration date.
To his credit, Jim Richerson did mention these items during his presentation, although he didn’t give any total dollar amounts. The $6 million in “public funding” to which Vergon referred is in addition to the $16-26 million from the city outlined above. That fact should be kept in mind while considering the museum-backers’ request for $24 million more from largely the same taxpayers.
Contrary to published reports, Schock did back down
The Gatehouse News Service report said, “Schock didn’t back down” from criticism of his proposal to sell nuclear arms to Taiwan. I beg to differ:
“If China continues to be irresponsible about nuclear proliferation in Iran, we should tell them that if they do not care about proliferation–and since they are enablers of it in Iran, that if they don’t change their position, we will sell Pershing nuclear missiles to Taiwan for their defense.” (Schock’s candidacy announcement speech, 10/28/07, emphasis added)
“I do not want to sell nuclear weapons to Taiwan, I want China’s cooperation in dealing with Iran.” (Schock’s press release, 11/8/07, emphasis added)
This is what pundits like to call a “flip-flop” on the issues. Despite all the other rhetoric in the latest press release, Schock nevertheless reversed himself on the selling of nuclear arms. If he had said in his original speech that he simply “want[ed] China’s cooperation in dealing with Iran,” then we wouldn’t be having all this controversy. No one would have even batted an eye.
The press release was nothing more than spin, and Gatehouse apparently bought it.
Is McDonald a Schock supporter?
Okay, that headline is needlessly provocative, but hey, I haven’t gotten many angry comments lately. 🙂
Journal Star reporter Karen McDonald covered Aaron Schock’s candidacy announcement event, but didn’t mention his proposal to sell nuclear arms to Taiwan. Then, when a Springfield reporter picked up the story, she attended challenger Jim McConoughey’s press conference reacting to the news, but didn’t write about it. Instead, the event was covered by Adrianna Colindres of Gatehouse News Service.
McDonald, on the other hand, wrote an article on Schock visiting public schools yesterday, but apparently didn’t ask about (or if she did ask, didn’t report on) Schock’s response to the foreign policy controversy. Yes, Schock had issued a press release that was in Colindres’s report, and yes Colindres did a phone interview with Schock’s campaign manager Steve Shearer. But McDonald had access to the man himself, and could have gotten a candid, rather than canned, answer. In fact, she could have followed up on his press release, pressing him on his clear flip-flop on this issue (he says in the press release that he doesn’t favor selling nukes to Taiwan). Instead, all we got was a puff piece.
Maybe I’m being too critical, but I think the local reporting on Schock’s campaign lately has been dismal and a disservice to those who are paying over $200 a year for Peoria’s only daily.
UPDATE: Great minds think alike. Independently, Billy Dennis and Rich Miller each commented on basically the same thing.
UPDATE 2: The Pantagraph has a much better report than the Journal Star on this story.
More on the Museum
Since I was attending our neighborhood association meeting last night, I was unable to attend the County Board meeting and hear the museum presentation. So I asked Patrick Urich, Peoria County Administrator, what happened. Here’s his account of the evening:
The Museum supporters came to the Board last night in force. Congressman LaHood opened by providing a historical account of where they have come from, Dave Koehler urged support for the project as a legacy project, Jim Vergon outlined the funding shortfall ($24 million), Jim Richerson presented the museum overview, Sid Banwart (Cat VP) stated that they have a significant commitment that will not go forward without the museum, Mark Johnson of Cat outlined what the Visitor’s Center would look like, Dan Silverthorn of the West Central Building Trades Council outlined the number of jobs and the payroll this would generate locally, and Dave Leitch closed by urging support. The challenge is that they would like an answer by mid-December.
Tim Riggenbach asked that the County staff review what options we have to assist and present that to the Finance Committee. The main issue is that as non-home rule county, we can only do what the statutes allow, unlike the City – which is home rule – who have the authority to raise taxes (HRA, sales, utility, property) by a simple majority vote. So our options are likely limited in the short term, but long term (which may mean forgoing the new market tax credits for now) we would work with the legislature to craft something that would have some sort of voter approval tied to it.
…We will also be putting the video up on our website. You can check today at http://www.peoriacounty.org/county/avmeeting
The best part of this report is the commitment to getting voter approval. If only other public bodies (*coughdistrict150cough*) would have such a commitment to inclusion.
Update on Coves, West Bluff issues
A couple of updates on recent neighborhood traffic concerns:
- The Coves — A public hearing was held Tuesday evening regarding a proposal to put a gate across Sedley street, cutting off vehicular access between the Coves of Charter Oak (a newly-built subdivision with no residents yet) and Vinton Highlands. I talked to a Traffic Commission member and learned that about 16-17 people attended the hearing. The only two who spoke in favor of the gate were the Coves developer, and one resident of Vinton Highlands that lives adjacent to the formerly-dead-end Sedley street. Everyone else spoke against it. The Traffic Commission will make a decision at their next scheduled meeting, but they will likely recommend against putting in a gate.
- The Uplands — The Uplands Residential Association (URA) met Thursday night to discuss a proposal to limit access to and from Main street. Specifically, the proposal was to allow only right turns from Main into the Uplands (i.e., onto Elmwood, Institute, Glenwood, Maplewood, and Parkside) and left turns onto Main from the Uplands (except for Parkside). The purpose was to mitigate cut-through traffic. The proposal was defeated 43-12. However, association members all agreed that speeding in the neighborhood is a problem, so the URA officers will now be putting together a proposal for traffic calming in the neighborhood.