D150 looking to save money by cutting instruction time, arts

“Well, I guess you can cut the arts as much as you want, Gene. Sooner or later, these kids aren’t going to have anything to read or write about.”

–Glenn Holland, “Mr. Holland’s Opus,” 1995

Peoria Public Schools logoI went to Whittier Primary School this morning. My kids will be going there next fall (I’m sure District 150’s administration is thrilled — I’ll have so much more to blog about now). Jackie, my oldest, has been going to a private school. It’s a small Christian school that’s been struggling to reach critical mass and just couldn’t do it, so it will be closing at the end of the school year. She’ll be going into third grade. Maggie, my youngest daughter, will be entering kindergarten.

So we went to the “Kindergarten Roundup” this morning to meet the principal — interim principal, as it turns out — and the teachers, and take a little tour of the school, and take a bus ride around the block. It was a fun morning.

One of the things we (and some other parents new to the school) wanted to know was what time school started and ended. I thought the answer was a little odd. “This year, school starts at 8:45″ and “lets out at 3:15.”

This year? Why the disclaimer?

Well, as it turns out, I had missed a very important part of the story on this past Monday’s school board meeting. Apparently, one of the school district’s efforts at saving money is to shorten the school day and cut some of the arts in the process:

But officials early on in the meeting Monday said job cuts may not be on the horizon, alluding to discussing late into the night the option of shortening the school day for primary students and their teachers instead. Students would have 45 fewer minutes at school; teachers’ days would be a half-hour shorter.

The savings, officials said, were estimated at $600,000 to $750,000 by reducing what’s spent on part-time prep teachers. An additional $45,000 to $60,000 would be saved by eliminating missed prep periods.

Scheduling changes would make up for some of the lost day and art or music classes could take some of the cuts, officials said, not essentials such as math and reading. That measure is expected to be discussed more at the May 5 board meeting.

Make the day shorter, and cut the arts. That’s how they’re considering saving money. Oh, but they won’t cut “essentials,” such as multiple superintendents math and reading. It’s interesting that they don’t see the arts as “essential.” Research shows:

  • Learning in the Arts is Academic. Learning experiences in the arts contribute to the development of academic skills, including the areas of reading and language development and mathematics.
  • Learning in the Arts is Basic. Arts learning experiences contribute to the development of certain thinking, social and motivational skills that are considered basic for success in school, life and work. These fundamental skills encompass a wide range of more subtle, general capacities of the mind, self-perceptions and social relationships.
  • Learning in the Arts is Comprehensive. The arts help create the kind of learning environment conducive to teacher and student success by fostering teacher innovation, a positive professional culture, community engagement, increased student attendance, effective instructional practice and school identity.

But hey, gotta save money somewhere. It only makes sense to cut multiple superintendents instruction time and the arts.

Hat tip: Billy Dennis and PeoriaIllinoisan.

New poll: Same results, different conclusion

Peoria County has done another survey that includes a question gauging support for a sales tax to benefit the proposed Peoria Regional Museum:

[A] majority of people who completed the survey also said they are either somewhat or strongly opposed of a referendum supporting the Riverfront Museum project…. Sixty-five percent reported they are somewhat or strongly opposed, while about 35 percent strongly or somewhat support the referendum. County officials say that is consistent with results of a telephone poll conducted earlier this year on the same topic.

But wait! What did county officials say after the last poll?

The survey administrator felt very positive that less than 50% of the respondents were either undecided or do not support a tax increase. In other words, more than 50% of the polled voters would support a tax increase to help fund the Museum Project.

It’s good to see they’ve dropped the positive spin this time.

This issue shouldn’t even be going to a referendum. The museum’s contract with the city has deadlines in it — deadlines they’ve already extended at least once, new deadlines they’re still not going to meet. How much longer are we going to prolong the agony?

If the citizens of Peoria really wanted this museum as proposed they would have financially supported it already. A tax just takes money from the opposed and indifferent. And if we’re going to raise taxes, let’s raise taxes for something we really need, like improved infrastructure.

The city should extend its thanks to the museum group for a valiant effort, but tell them to go back to the drawing board. This plan is dead. If the museum group would like to come up with another plan — urban in design, narrower in scope, and willing to share the block with retail and residential components like every urban planner the city has ever hired has recommended for that block — then the city should definitely entertain the idea.

Comprehensive Plan survey results are in

Peoria LogoRoss Black, Assistant Planning Director for the City of Peoria, has released the results of the Comprehensive Plan online survey. You can read the summary results here (PDF file); more details will be released in the near future.

Take a look at them and tell me what you think. Here are some things I thought were interesting or notable:

  • The one-to-ten scale is inverted — lower numbers indicate higher satisfaction or importance and vice versa.
  • They’re still saying that lower scores indicate that something is “not important.” I think that’s misleading, as I’ve explained in this earlier post.
  • Survey-takers’ satisfaction with Peoria as a place to live is decidedly middling: 4.2. In other words, “so-so.”
  • Not surprising was that the top two districts to respond to the survey were the fifth and second districts (29% and 21%, respectively).
  • Very surprising was how many people took the survey who don’t even live in Peoria (18%) — they were actually the third highest group! Gee, thanks for the input, interlopers. I suppose one could make the argument that these are people who have businesses or rental properties in the city, but who personally live outside the city. If so, then the high percentage is even more disturbing.
  • Lowest district representation: first (5%). This is not surprising. The first district includes predominantly lower-income residents, many of whom presumably cannot afford computers and internet access, and even if they can, don’t have the time to spend filling out surveys. There are also a lot of renters who presumably would not have as much interest in the city’s comprehensive planning process. Many may also just simply feel disenfranchised — like nobody cares about their opinions anyway.
  • 93% of respondents were white, 5% were black, 1% were Asian, 1% were “other,” and less than 1% were Native American. According to the 2000 census, 69.3% of Peorians were white, 24.8% were black, 2.3% were Asian, less than 1% were “American Indian.”
  • The higher the income, the more people responded. 80% of respondents had a household income of over $50,000. 20% of respondents had household income less than $50,000. Median household income in 1999, according to the census: $36,397.
  • 35% of respondents would “like to live within walking distance from downtown and the riverfront.” That’s a little more than one out of every three respondents — a significant number.
  • The number one item under Public Health and Human Services: “Provide youth services that guide children toward good behavior.” Wow. Apparently it takes a government to raise a child. When I was a kid, we had parents to guide children toward good behavior. Now we need “youth services” provided by the city.

Your turn. What are your thoughts on the results?

From the “how did we survive” department

Here’s one of those breathless articles on how important it is to encase oneself in padding and a helmet when engaging in death-defying activities such as bicycling. I’m waiting for the “experts” to start pushing for joggers, then walkers to also wear lots of padding and helmets. Maybe they already do. Perhaps we should wear protective gear inside the house as well, whenever we decide we want to walk upstairs or — worse — downstairs. I’ll bet the statistics on accidents from people falling downstairs is staggering.