Library board picks site by Menards

HOI News is reporting that the Peoria Public Library board has picked a site for the new north library branch — an undeveloped parcel behind the new Menards off of Allen Road (there’s a picture of the lot on HOI’s site, so click the link to see it).

The cost for the 6.12 acre lot will be $1.67 million.

Board members say the site was picked based on price.

The land developer has agreed to keep industrial businesses off the lots surrounding the library site for aesthetic reasons.

I find that last line amusing. As if there is any aesthetically pleasing commercial area in the fifth district!

The story also mentioned that the board voted to not expand Lakeview, as expected.

Illinois chosen as part of tailored NCLB pilot program

The Journal Star (AP) reports that Illinois was one of six states chosen to “write their own prescriptions for ailing schools under the Bush administration’s signature education law,” i.e., No Child Left Behind, or NCLB.

This press release from the Illinois State Board of Education outlines their “prescription” for our ailing schools:

Illinois receives additional flexibility to help schools meet federal NCLB requirements

One of 6 states accepted into new U.S. Dept. of Education pilot program; flexibility targets low-performing schools earlier with tailored resources

Springfield — Illinois State Superintendent of Education Christopher A. Koch announced today that Illinois has been chosen to participate in a federal pilot program to provide additional flexibility and tools to assist schools in meeting federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requirements. The U.S. Department of Education selected Illinois as one of six states to participate in the new pilot program that allows the Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE) to focus additional resources and efforts on schools and districts across the state with targeted efforts.

“Our state testing data shows that there are many different reasons why schools fail to meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) measures. Current NCLB guidelines are one-size-fits-all, and treating all schools the same is not an effective approach, just as treating each student the same is not effective,” said Supt. Koch. “With this additional flexibility we will be able to identify and focus our efforts on the students that need it the most. I’m excited about this opportunity to take more immediate action to improve our lowest-performing schools.”

With the U.S. Department of Education’s ‘Differentiated Accountability’ pilot program, ISBE can use different strategies, providing additional resources, techniques and approaches to help all students succeed. Illinois’ approval is conditioned on demonstrating that state assessments administered in 2007-08 are fully compliant with NCLB. The overarching goal of NCLB is for all students to meet or exceed standards in reading and mathematics by 2014.

Because of the flexibility, low-performing schools in Illinois will begin offering additional tutoring earlier to students. Currently, schools that fail to make AYP in the same subject area two consecutive years must offer public school choice (PSC) and tutoring services after three years. Under the pilot, schools will offer either school choice or tutoring after failing to make AYP for two consecutive years and both options after failing for three consecutive years.

With school choice, students must be given the option to attend a public school that is not identified for improvement. However, in smaller districts, this option isn’t always available to students. By implementing tutoring as an earlier option, students will have access to additional services such as academic assistance in reading and math, to take place before school, after school or during the summer.

Also, ISBE will be able to differentiate between low-performing schools under the new pilot program. Schools and districts will continue to move through the process of improvement each year they do not make AYP, however, instead of all schools failing to meet state standards being labeled as in ‘need of improvement’, under the new system, schools and districts will be classified as either in the ‘focused’ or ‘comprehensive’ category. Schools and districts that make AYP in the “ALL students” subgroup, but not in one or more of the other subgroups would be placed in the ‘focused’ category, while schools that fail to meet state standards in the “ALL students” subgroup would be identified as ‘comprehensive.’

Illinois’ testing data shows that schools in the ‘comprehensive’ category are achieving lower than those in the ‘focused’ category and would greatly benefit more from intensive and specific interventions. In addition, ISBE would also eliminate ‘corrective action’ as a school designation of improvement. The corrective designation for schools will be replaced with a third year of either ‘focused school improvement’ or ‘comprehensive school improvement so that interventions have longer to work.’

The state’s lowest-performing schools will also be eligible to participate in an intensive ‘Priority Schools’ initiative. This initiative aims to make drastic changes that produce significant achievement gains as quickly as possible.

The five other states approved for the pilot include Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland and Ohio. A total of 17 states submitted proposals for the program. Each state’s proposal, including Illinois’, was reviewed by a panel of nationally recognized experts. In return for the additional flexibility, each state has to commit to building their capacity for school reform; take the most significant actions for the lowest-performing schools, including addressing the issue of teacher effectiveness; and use data to determine the method of differentiation and categories of intervention.

ISBE will begin implementing portions of the proposal during the 2008-09 school year with full implementation in the 2009-10 year.

From the archives: “How to write a political ad”

Since we’re entering campaign season in earnest now (only five months until the big election), I thought it might be a good time to reprint one of my favorite posts from the first year of my blog. It references the gubernatorial election from that time, but is generally applicable to any election. Enjoy.

“How to write a political ad,” from The Peoria Chronicle, 2/16/2006:

I’ve been watching the ads on TV being run by Illinois gubernatorial candidates, and I think I’ve figured out what it takes to write good copy for these things:

  1. Be as vague as possible. Problems are complex, and people have short attention spans, so steer clear of anything resembling a specific suggestion. In fact, if you can get away with saying only, “Me good, them bad,” just leave it at that.
  2. Passionately embrace outcomes only a comic-book villain would oppose. For instance, say you’re for “better schools,” “balancing the budget,” and “clean water.” This will set you apart from the other candidates who, I assume, are the Joker and the Riddler.
  3. Remember, a picture says a thousand lies. Show lots of pictures of yourself spending quality time with your family; that will give your family something to watch while you’re out on the road the next several months shilling for campaign contributions and brokering endorsement deals. And be sure to include the election-winning illusion that you’re spending your mornings in public schools reading to children because you’ve devoted your life to volunteerism.
  4. Attack your opponent’s record — but more importantly, attack his motives. It’s much easier to win against a corrupt political insider with lust for power than someone who’s simply pursuing a different path to the same goals as you. When talking about your opponent(s), always be sure to show unflattering pictures of them in black and white with an ominous musical underscore. Cynicism and ad hominem attacks are the road to victory.
  5. Finally, point people to your website, which has the same empty rhetoric as your political ad. This is where you can really put your doublespeak skills to work. An actual, complete quote from one candidate’s website explaining her commitment to leadership: “In every area of State government and especially in the Governor’s office, this State’s high standing for competence and leadership has suffered during the last three years.” The funny thing? This candidate works in state government.

And everyone wonders why voter turnout is so low.

Avid or Final Cut?

Sorry to invade the Chronicle with a work-related post — I rarely ever do this — but I thought there might be some other video editors out there that would be willing to share their opinion with me. We’re considering whether to stick with Avid or switch to Final Cut Pro for our editing suite at work. If you have any experience with one or both systems, what’s your advice from an editing standpoint? I’m thinking in terms of ease of use/learning curve, quality of output, tools/features, etc.