November 2008
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Follow PeoriaChronicle on Twitter

Recent Comments

  • Sharon Crews: You must be one of the lucky ones–to have such a wonderful mother-in-law.
  • Jon: You seem real, too, Sharon. Kind of like my mother-in-law.
  • Sharon Crews: What Charlie means (as with many who comment here)is that many of us know the identities of those who...
  • charlie: You should never post anything that you wouldn’t want everyone to know YOU posted. Anonymity is not...
  • Sharon Crews: So are we assuming that DTaggart is using a phony name? What I really find offensive about all of this...
  • Block the bullys!: Here is a link to the Multiad Corporate Exec. page. http://www.multiad.com/corp.sh tml Shall we...
  • Sharon Crews: Jackie, I would assume that the only thing available to C.J. is our e-mail address since we blog from...
  • jackie: Kind of figured he could but that was the first time I had seen proof of it. It was just sort of a reminder...
  • Sharon Crews: Frustrated, I agree with you (as you well know) about District 150′s obligation to meet the needs...
  • Jon: “I have always wondered if CJ can view your email address that you sign in with.” Jackie, you might...
  • Sharon Crews: Jackie, if you believed that “DTaggart” crossed the line, why did you thank him/her for the...
  • jackie: That we agree on! Even though I was asking what you did for a living I accepted your response that basically...
  • truth: An eye for an eye.
  • C. J. Summers: “jackie” — You live by the sword, you die by the sword. You don’t publish my...
  • jackie: “Now, just out of curiosity, why did you post your question from your work computer at Multi-Ad? Is...

MLB Standings

Categories

No “wonderful development” on agenda for Tuesday

Of course it could be revised on Friday, but as of today there is no “wonderful development” on the agenda for Tuesday’s council meeting. However, there are some other interesting items:

  • AMVETS building landmark status: The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) voted in favor of preserving the AMVETS building (formerly United Duroc building), but the city council informally voted against it when they were polled by the AMVETS before the issue even went to the HPC. So now it’s really a muddled mess. If the council votes for landmark status, the AMVETS will feel disenfranchised as property owners because it will make their building harder to sell. If the council votes against landmark status, it marginalizes the HPC and sets up a precedent of bypassing them altogether. Oh, and it will mean the loss of another historic building, but that’s nothing new. Peoria never has much cared for preservation. I predict the council will not landmark the building, and it will be torn down before the end of the year. The lesson to take away: don’t wait until the last minute to request historic designation.
  • Convenience loan restrictions: The moratorium is about to expire on any new so-called convenience loan establishments from opening. The city has done some research on possible restrictions to keep such establishments from clustering the way they have along University between War Memorial and Forrest Hill. Their recommendation:

    a. Permitting the use of Convenience Cash Businesses, as permitted and/or special uses only in the B1, CG, C1, and C2 zoning districts (Currently permitted in these districts plus 01, 02, and CN).

    b. Distance requirements of a 1500 foot radius from other Convenience Cash businesses (Note that the City has an inventory of 1,681 parcels with appropriate base zoning {B1, CG, C1, and C2}. Of that inventory, 61% or 1026 parcels meet the distance requirements and could be developed with new convenience cash businesses {Map 2}).

    c. If the distance requirements cannot be met business owners would have the option of obtaining Special Use approval.

    The Zoning Commission had some slightly different suggestions, such as requiring the convenience loan establishment to be 1500 feet away from any residential-zoned district, which would leave only two parcels in all of Peoria where a new loan place could locate. No doubt there will be no small amount of discussion on the council floor before a vote is taken on this one.

  • 4 a.m. liquor license area expansion: Most bars in the area have to close at 2 a.m. But there’s a small area downtown where you can get a special subclass of license allowing you to stay open until 4 a.m. The council is considering a pretty major expansion of that area — one that will include the Warehouse District and extend all the way to South Street. Here’s a map of the current license area and the proposed addition:

    This would include the Club Apollo and Excalibur nightclubs. Police Chief Steve Settingsgaard is in favor of the expansion, and the Liquor Commission approved it 5-0. It looks like a shoo-in for approval by the council, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there were a few citizens who ask for the privilege of the floor to try to persuade the council against it.

There will also be more discussion on the 2009 budget. You see the proposed budget by visiting the PeoriaBudget.com website.

2 comments to No “wonderful development” on agenda for Tuesday

  • Lancer

    Re: The AMVETS building

    Sure, why not! Just tear it down. Peoria loves to bury its historical structures to make way for the “bland”. I give you Methodist Hospital vs. the (beautiful) Unitarian church on Hamilton Blvd. Loser, the unique 1911 built church. Let’s bulldoze High St. while we’re at it. Those grand homes could make way for student housing or maybe another strip mall.

  • The EVIL Peoria Developers

    (laughter) Just YOU wait, Lancer! ” We’re not done with THIS city yet…. Once WE finishing wrecking the Peoria riverfront with the faceless museum block, we’ll expand ADM’s hideous and industrial-revolutionary relic northward. And later, we’ll raze all the High Street mansions for a, big, section-8 complex. Why? Because, WE can! Who dares to stop US?

    ” ALL hail the mighty power of the TIF! “

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>