November 2012
« Oct   Dec »


  • Karrie E. Alms: Amazing insight into the world of politics awaits any reader at pibgorn … from a Demon’s...
  • Tony: Homefield is Dynegy. Dynegy is Ameren. There Charging You twice for the same energy. Do you really thihk $.04...
  • SouthEnder: Also does anyone remember the Velvet Freeze located on Jefferson St, up the street from the Warner Homes....
  • Eric Pollitt: I flew economy class to Hong Kong for Christmas vacation, which is a 14 hour flight. When I got back...
  • Mike: Homefield has been sold to dynery. Google dynegy scandal to see who your new parent is. If this upsets you give...
  • mortified: Fun while it lasted. Godspeed!
  • aaron: your blogging will be missed but i know that your spirit of fairness will remain alive in your other...
  • Jon: CJ, your blog was a revelation and an inspiration. You have a wonderful talent that is an asset to the...
  • Billy Dennis: Of course the Chronicle is done: Screw you. The Chronicle is one of the best researched blogs...
  • Paul Wilkinson: CJ, am sorry you have ended your blog. It was well done. It seems many have given up as we keep...
  • Sharon Crews: Your voice is definitely needed in this community. Thanks for all your insights.
  • emergepeoria: Your blog is great resource to research Peoria issues. I hope you leave it up.
  • BucketHead: I was not suggesting that, I believe the both of you had very strong common sense and that lead to your...
  • C. J. Summers: Without anonymity, there is no courage among my detractors. Take a look back at the wide variety of...
  • Of course the Chronicle is done: Without Sandberg to give stores to the Chronicle there is no Chronicle.

Main Street Commons, City Council continue to flout form-based codes

More residential parcels will become parking lots for the Main Street Commons development following the City Council’s 8-2 vote Tuesday night. The student apartment complex at Main Street and Bourland Avenue was granted approval to add 32 more apartment units to the existing 88 units and nearly double the number of off-street parking spaces from 97 to 182.

The plan, which violates the letter and spirit of the Land Development Code, was agreed to by City staff, the Zoning Commission, and the majority of the City Council. The plan was opposed by the University East Neighborhood Association and council members Akeson and Sandberg.

And they say Peoria isn’t “business friendly.” The Zoning Commission approved the plan even though the developer stood in front of them and admitted that he didn’t respond to the neighborhood association’s request to have him explain his plan to them. Second district council member Barbara Van Auken, who is seeking reelection next spring, made the motion to approve on the Council floor in spite of opposition to the project from the neighbors she represents.

Whither the West Main Form District?

What’s especially disappointing about this latest addition to Main Street Commons’ special use permit is that this project is set in one of the City’s four form districts — areas with very specific form-based codes. Form-based codes are used to combat urban sprawl — to proscribe built environments like the very one being created by Main Street Commons. This code was put together following a long process of public involvement and the inclusion of all stakeholders in the area.

But form-based codes only work if they’re followed. In this case, certain limits within the code have been consistently overridden by the Zoning Commission and the Council to the detriment of the neighborhood.

The buildings that front Main Street, according to the code, can be up to 5 stories tall, but as you move away from Main Street and into the adjoining neighborhood, the building mass is supposed to diminish. The code permits structures to be built along Bourland (going north from Main) to be 2-3 stories high and have frontage that does not extend further than 130 feet. The structure the council is allowing will be 4 stories high and extend 200 feet. This does not sufficiently taper the building mass into the neighborhood.

Another purpose behind the limits on building mass is to provide enough room on and around the block for parking. By increasing the mass of the building, additional parking needs are generated, and that has led to the razing of houses in the adjoining neighborhood to make way for surface parking lots. As of Tuesday night, two more parcels were added for conversion to surface lots. This again violates the letter and spirit of the code. Two of the goals of the parking requirements are to “reduce fragmented, uncoordinated, inefficient, single-purpose reserved parking,” and, “avoid adverse parking impacts on neighborhoods adjacent to the form districts.” This special use does just the opposite.

The code also requires alleys, but in a subsequent vote the Council vacated the existing alleys in the block being developed by Main Street Commons.

In short, the Land Development Code was once again eviscerated, treated like it doesn’t exist. The protections for neighborhoods were overruled and a development that could have been a welcome addition and stabilizing force has instead turned into an encroaching, destabilizing force in the University East neighborhood because it’s being allowed to grow unchecked by the very public bodies that are supposed to be representing the residents of Peoria.

Salt Lake City takes a different, better approach

The very same night the Peoria City Council voted to allow houses in an urban neighborhood to be razed to make way for a surface parking lot, the City Council in Salt Lake City, Utah, banned demolishing buildings to create parking lots. Furthermore, they are considering an ordinance that “would require property owners to keep vacant buildings and houses ‘habitable’ — fit to live or work in. It would allow for demolition only after a property owner submits plans for a replacement structure and obtains a building permit.”

Why? Because they recognize that just razing buildings does not stabilize an area. Take a look on the South Side or East Bluff in Peoria. There are lots of empty lots where houses have been razed. But has that really helped the neighborhood? There are certainly some advantages to such a strategy if the property was an eyesore, safety hazard, or haven for drug dealers. But ultimately, replacing run-down structures with vacant lots (often weed-infested) and surface parking do nothing to increase property values or attract new people to the neighborhood. Urban neighborhoods with multiple missing houses look like a smile with missing teeth: not attractive.

It’s a shame more progressive policies against blight can’t be enacted — and enforced — here in Peoria. It’s a shame we don’t enforce the existing policies that residents already worked so hard to enact.

A person in the City Council gallery Tuesday, frustrated with the Council on another issue that affects a neighborhood in the third district, asked rhetorically if the City Council represents the residents or the developers. I think we all know the answer to that question.

15 comments to Main Street Commons, City Council continue to flout form-based codes

  • soothsayer

    What a sad situation this is. At one time, many residents supported this project, but what was promised and what was delivered are vastly different. Throw in the unwillingness of the developer to communicate, greedy property owners- anxious to sell to the developer- who became paid shills for the project, a councilwoman and city staffers determined to ram this through at all costs, a neighborhood association president who would have preferred to have this all go away, directly affected residents who felt tossed under the bus by the city, their council rep and- in some cases- their own neighbors, loads of misinformation and a lot of under-handed behavior – and you’ve got a majorly messed-up situation. Top it all off with poor quality construction and the fact that Bradley University, who was a major supporter of the project, pulled their residential life presence out of the building due to its many problems. Main Street Commons is an embarrassment to the West Bluff. It could been great, but mediocraty rules here, it seems.

  • Mahkno

    I am surprised they are adding more apartments. I have heard that Main Street Commons has been having difficulty filling the spaces that are currently built. Bradley isn’t happy with the arrangements for the students either.

  • Mahkno

    Does anyone really think Grayeb would do better on this?

  • Chuck Grayeb for Peoria City Council

    Mahkno – short answer – yes. Chuck Grayeb would be an independent thinker, beholden only to his constituents. I think he would govern in the vein of Gary Sandberg; albeit a clean shave, stylish clothes and a pleasant demeanor.

  • Mahkno

    ** Chuck Grayeb for Peoria City Council

    This constituent has not forgotten about Mid-Town Plaza nor has he forgotten many of Grayeb’s other questionable positions.

  • Chuck Grayeb for Peoria City Council

    Mahkno – Contact him through his Facebook page –

    He would probably like to meet you for a cup of coffee, and will listen attentively to your perspectives and concerns.

  • cre8tivman

    You had better believe Grayeb would do better on this. He has a history of promoting neighborhood revitalization and public safety. No one is perfect, but one thing is for sure; Barbara Van Awful has consistently broken promises, been unavailable when she was needed, been dismissive of too much that needed attention and she is a blight on the city council itself.

  • […] TWO CENTS: Here is a good post from the Peoria Chronicle: More residential parcels will become parking lots for the Main Street Commons development […]

  • checking for details

    you are correct, but watch. Spain and Ardis will campaign for her yes vote with a vengeance.

  • The old saying, “They have the power to change things, but don’t have the will to do so” keeps running through my head every time a story involving a local municipality comes out. The last thing anywhere in the Tri-County area needs is more parking.

    Locally, it’s not about what side of the aisle you choose to vote for, it is really simply how well you understand a multitude of complex issues. It has been seen time and time again that they either don’t get it, or do get it, but just choose not change.

    Unfortunately, even with all the talks and meetings you cannot change what is broken here. Study after study, plan after plan, commission on top of commission, and even implementing a FBC (which I fully support) doesn’t mean a thing if you can’t put it to use the way it is intended.

  • Vonster

    Mahkno: I heard that too. I wonder where their plans for a pool/party area on the site are at.

  • Martin Palmer

    The form-based codes will never be enforced. It is a “fad” that we paid for with our tax monies. The shelves are full of “plans” trotted out and then shelved. Don’t shoot will be another plan shelved after the election.

  • Karrie E. Alms

    Chuck Grayeb For Peoria City Council writes:

    He would probably like to meet you for a cup of coffee, and will listen attentively to your perspectives and concerns.

    Whether it is Chuck or anyone else running for office … listening attentively to a constituents perspectives and concerns … not enough just like Martin writes … one fad until another fad comes along to replace it and so on … that is the problem … listening and not doing your constituents will. Same old same old.

  • mortified

    Go Grayeb!

  • Vonster

    hell yes! We need a gay guy back on council! [runs like hell]