Calendar

December 2012
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Comments

  • lanestar7: The one and only time I saw a movie at the museum I noticed a big either dent or scrape in the center left...
  • Jim: My biggest problem with this plan is the lack of actual growth for the city. This does not grow anything in...
  • lanestar7: No one has ever made a convincing argument? The Labor Center at UC Berkeley might not agree with you...
  • Emil: School fnances are a mess, Park District can’t attract quality softball tournaments because fields and...
  • hightower62: No one has made a convincing argument that employing an unemployed person costs the government...
  • Mr. Lane: Conrad, I agree. I don’t understand it when people say it’s so hard to avoid Wal-Mart. I made a...
  • Vonster: Lane: However, I agree that location is not good for a Wal-Mart for some of the reason you mention. I hope...
  • Vonster: Hightower: Wal-Mart is bad no matter what. Don’t you listen??
  • Dennis in Peoria: First, this proposal has to be approved by the Peoria Public Schools District 150 Board of...
  • Mike: hightowner62: As a company think about using as your strategy to hire part time low wage people. It is self...
  • The Mouse: If you want to make yourself sick, you can do it for less than that.
  • Emtronics: For $25 you can get seat at the Mayor’s breakfast and watch as he hands the deed over to WalMart...
  • The Mouse: it’s called crony capitalism. If most companies proposed something like that, they’d be...
  • Emtronics: Because Walmart staff discourages their people to hold other jobs and they treat their employees like...
  • hightower62: lanestar7 says that every WalMart employee costs the government $2000 per year in health care and LINK...

Review: “Les Miserables” the movie

My wife and I took in the screen adaptation of the hit Broadway musical “Les Miserables” this afternoon. My recommendation: see the stage version, and skip the movie.

It’s not that this musical couldn’t have made a successful transition from stage to screen. There were two major problems with this particular movie: casting and directing.

There were two major characters that were poorly cast: Fantine (played by Anne Hathaway) and Javert (played by Russell Crowe). Hathaway’s melodramatic performance was way, way over the top. Broadway performers know how to act and sing at the same time. Hathaway appears able to do only one or the other at any given moment. Crowe is less objectionable. His characterization of Javert was quite good; however, his voice is simply not strong enough to carry Javert’s singing part. Crowe can carry a tune, but he can’t sell the song. And, seeing as how this is more or less an opera, that’s no small deficiency when you’re the antagonist for close to three hours.

But the biggest problem with the screen adaptation was the directing, which consisted of primarily two shots: closeups and extreme closeups. (I’m exaggerating, of course, but only a little.) Watching Marius sing “Empty Chairs at Empty Tables,” or Fantine sing “I Dreamed a Dream,” while on a static closeup for nearly the entire song did not display a great deal of either acting or directing skills. If this directing choice was meant to provoke pity and sadness, it only succeeded for the first forty-five seconds or so. After that, the viewers become anxious and jittery as their eyes begin searching for something — anything &mdash else to look at: the out-of-focus background, the borders of the screen, the exit sign, whatever can be found. The poignancy of “Empty Chairs at Empty Tables” would be captured better by seeing Marius alone in the room with the abandoned furniture for at least part of the time he sings about it. But alas, the set designer’s work is barely seen, and the actor is called upon to convey the full emotion of the moment solely through his face and voice.

Not that the film was all bad. Jean Valjean (Hugh Jackman), Enjorlas (Aaron Tviet), Gavroche (Daniel Huttlestone), and of course the Bishop (Colm Wilkinson, who played the original Jean Valjean on stage) were high points as they all turned in exceptional performances, both in acting and singing. The Thenardiers (Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter) were entertaining, and Marius and Eponine (Eddie Redmayne and Samantha Barks) performed well. The set design was excellent.

If you’re a die-hard “Les Miserables” fan, you’ll want to see this movie regardless of the reviews. But if you’ve never seen the musical, don’t judge it based on the movie. The stage version is far superior.

4 comments to Review: “Les Miserables” the movie

  • Vonster

    I suffered thru the 98 movie. Never again. Sorry.

  • frequent reader

    I have a different take on it. I’ve seen this on stage twice and enjoyed it, but in seeing the movie I understood all the dialogue for the first time which greatly enhanced my understanding of what was happening. Also, seeing their faces up close elicited a lot more emotion on my part. When I saw the stage versions we were so far from the stage we couldn’t see their faces up close enough to see their anguish.

  • point of order

    I thought it was excellent. I wanted to stand up and applaud at the end just like you do after a stage presentation.

  • Frustrated

    I agree with Frequent Reader. Saw Les Mis on stage and only sort of got the story. The movie helped me pull it all together. I really enjoyed the movie.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>