Tag Archives: Kay Royster

Royster strikes again

Kay RoysterWhen we last left former District 150 Superintendent Kay Royster, she had just been fired from a school district in Missouri. Well, since then, the state has audited the school district. From the July 29 St. Louis Post-Dispatch:

The Jennings School District ran annual deficits of $3 million for four years, mismanaged an expensive plan to provide hand-held computers for students and has many sloppy accounting practices, a state audit released Tuesday found.

The report, by Missouri Auditor Susan Montee, also says the district appears to have paid an excessive severance to former Superintendent Kay Royster, who championed the purchase of 2,572 Palm T/X computers. Montee reports the district didn’t competitively bid for the computers, overspent the $950,000 project budget by $304,000, never hooked up a workable system and had 324 of the computers in storage as of January.

“The units are basically sitting in the classroom unused or seldom used,” Montee said.

Royster announced the mini-computer program in February 2007 as a way to keep the district “on the cutting edge.” But when the board fired her one year later, members cited declining student test scores and the failure to put the devices to effective use.

The audit says the computer overspending is one reason for the annual deficits. Others include an extra $988,000 for nine administrators added mainly by Royster and the $249,709 severance package she obtained in February 2008.

Kalamazoo. Peoria. Jennings. Who will be next?

Will D150 let search firm finish its work this time?

From the Journal Star:

A committee appointed to begin the search for District 150’s next superintendent will recommend the School Board hire . . . Hazard, Young, Attea & Associates to find a replacement for retiring Superintendent Ken Hinton.

This is the same search firm that was hired for nearly $20,000 in 2004 to find a replacement for ousted superintendent Kay Royster. But before they could complete their work, the District 150 board decided to hire Ken Hinton, even though he wasn’t qualified for the job at the time. The Journal Star reported on Feburary 1, 2005:

Without a public vote or notice, the District 150 School Board seems to have stopped searching for a new, permanent superintendent and has given its search firm the impression that the current superintendent arrangement will be permanent.

In a Jan. 29 e-mail response to the Journal Star stated that plans to bring superintendent candidates to Peoria for interviews have been dropped.

“We have a slate of competitive candidates we were planning to present to the board on Jan. 7 or thereafter,” he wrote.

“It is our understanding that will be the permanent arrangement. We regret that other candidates were not considered,” he stated. […]

A letter of agreement between the board and the search firm says the firm will be paid $19,500 plus expenses and does not contain a cancellation clause.

Schock said the board was still “looking into Hinton’s status. We’re finishing that up right now. Then the board will have a decision to make.”

Hinton has never completed the college courses required to be certified as a superintendent in Illinois, but several board members have expressed support for him to be named permanent superintendent.

Shortly after that, the board made it official. Here’s the Journal Star’s report from February 19, 2005:

The district hired a search firm to find candidates in September, but about three months later, some board members asked Hinton to consider the position. He began exploring his options and found the accelerated course at Western Illinois University. It starts March 11.

Board president Aaron Schock said the search firm’s contract will be terminated at Tuesday’s meeting. He said the firm performed half its duties and will get about $10,000.

Schock said he doesn’t consider this wasted money.

“I think it was the responsible thing for us to do at the time … (but) things change,” he said.

If the board hires this search firm (again) on the committee’s recommendation, I hope they let them complete their work this time. That was one of the most irresponsible decisions District 150 ever made — to throw $10,000 down the drain and hire someone unqualified for the job. Let’s hope that part of history doesn’t repeat itself.

Also of interest is that the choice of Hazard, Young, Attea & Associates was controversial in 2004 because of a past superintendent placement of theirs:

In November, the relationship between the search firm and some board members soured when they learned the search firm previously placed ousted Superintendent Kay Royster in her former job at Kalamazoo, Mich.

Let’s hope that part of history doesn’t repeat itself either!