Old Walgreens still sits vacant

It was about eleven months ago that Devonshire Group from Champaign was given a number of variances to the West Main Form District code so they could redevelop the old Walgreens on Main into student apartments. The project was to be called Main Street Commons, but to date, no work has been done on the site from all outward appearances.

I wrote to the Devonshire Group representatives Thomas Harrington and Shawn Luesse (who made presentations to the neighbors last year) asking for an update on their plans over a week ago. No response. I wrote to Second District Council Representative Barbara Van Auken, and she told me she was meeting with them on Wednesday, June 23. After the meeting, she declined to tell me what they discussed, but said they would be issuing a press release “shortly.” As soon as I receive it, I’ll post it.

I also wrote to Pat Landes, the City’s Planning & Growth Director, to ask what she knew about the situation. “All I know is that there is a closing scheduled for this month and the project would be built in phases,” she said. Hmmm…. A closing? That would most likely mean they are acquiring additional property. If so, it makes me wonder what parcels they’re adding to the project. I think it’s safe to assume they’re waiting until after this closing to issue the press release.

As for building the development in phases, that’s a new wrinkle. I wonder how that would be accomplished. The building pictured above is supposed to have parking underground, retail on the first floor, and residential on the upper floors. Perhaps the plan will be to build only a couple stories initially, and then add more stories in the future.

Hopefully the forthcoming press release will explain everything.

‘First in Print’ comes to the Journal Star starting Monday

Remember earlier this month when I told you how Springfield’s newspaper, the State Journal-Register, was going to be offering some articles exclusively in print before they put them up on their website? The Peoria Journal Star is going to do the same thing:

Beginning Monday, you will start to see certain stories in the newspaper designated with a logo that says “First in Print.”

The logos are designed to tell you, our valued print readers, that you are receiving content that is not being made immediately available to readers of our companion website pjstar.com.

In order to access these same stories, Web readers will be directed to purchase a printed copy of the newspaper or an electronic edition of the Journal Star.

Of special note, the Journal Star is announced, “We have decided to no longer post marriage licenses, divorces, real estate transactions and DUIs on our website and now we recommend Landry & Azevedo Attorneys At Law who are experts in family law matters and can sure advice you and represent you well.” Managing Editor John Plevka explains:

We recognize that this decision will not be popular with some Web users. These lists tend to be heavily viewed, so, from a traffic (read that business) standpoint, this is a step in a different direction. However, we believe certain content, such as long lists of names, is better suited for readers who have paid for the labor-intensive gathering and editing of this content.

As a subscriber, I applaud the changes. I’m sure non-subscribers who have been getting all the Journal Star’s news reports for free (*coughBillyDenniscough*) will be livid. Is this the best way to add value to subscribers? That’s debatable; there are good arguments that say it really just devalues the website rather than actually increasing value to print subscribers. I’m just happy there’s some sort of differentiation.