I always heard that the reason there weren’t more family-friendly movies out there was because sex and violence sell and mamby-pamby G-rated flicks are big money losers.
But now there’s a new report out by the Dove Foundation called Profitability Study of MPAA-Rated Movies, and their findings are fascinating. I encourage you to click the link and check out the whole report (it’s only 12 pages), but here’s the bottom line:
While the movie industry produced nearly 12 times more R-rated films than G-rated from 1989 – 2003 (1,533 and 123 respectively), the average G-rated film produced 11 times greater profit than its R-rated counterpart ($78,982,000 and $6,939,000 respectively).
G-rated films also produced an average rate of return on investment (ROI) three times greater than R-rated films (94.5% vs. 28.7%).
Between 2000 and 2003, Hollywood produced nearly four times as many PG-13 films as PG (75 vs. 21). During that same time, the average PG film produced $33 million greater profit than a PG-13 film ($78.8 million vs. $45.6 million).
G-rated films were identified overall as most lucrative in all of the following categories:
-Net profit per film
-Theatrical box office per film
-Video revenue per film
-Rate of return per filmFilms with a PG rating consistently report higher profits and rates of return than PG-13 and R-rated films.
So, it appears the conventional wisdom is off-target. If it’s all about the money, the theaters should be flooded with G- and PG-rated fare. So one wonders, why aren’t there more family-friendly movies?