Obama throws his hat in the ring… almost

Senator Barack ObamaAs if we didn’t see this one coming, Barack Obama officially announced on his website that he’s taking the first step toward a presidential run in 2008. The first step is to create a “presidential exploratory committee.” He says he’s not making this decision based on “media hype or personal ambition alone,” but rather because he thinks we need “a change in our politics.”

And so it begins. The usual rhetoric is there — Washington leaders “seem incapable of working together,” politics has become “bitter and partisan, [all] gummed up by money and influence.” And, of course, Obama can change all that… with your help. It’s a Pollyanna press release.

Right now, he’s going to see how much support he has, then “share his plans” on February 10. The New York Times reports that “aides said the announcement speech next month would outline more specifics.” That’s when the rubber meets the road. When you start taking stands on controversial issues, it’s hard to transcend “bitter and partisan” Washington politics.

Technically, his hat isn’t really in the ring until he declares himself a candidate; but let’s face it, that’s pretty likely to happen on February 10. Already, the media are having a field day. BBC News practically has him elected. CNN is surprisingly more circumspect. Let the circus begin!

Click on “Show More” for the full press release (or read it on Obama’s website):

|inline

Long time, no hear from museum group

It was November 17 when we last heard from the museum collaboration group. Jim Richerson announced a $1 million gift toward the IHSA Hall of Fame portion of the museum from Country Insurance. The Journal Star also had this quote:

“We’re still in the silent portion of our fund drive,” Richerson said. “What we’re hoping for is that gifts like the one from Country Insurance will now inspire others to come aboard.”

Hmmm, the “silent portion” of the fund drive? Readers may remember last fall Kathleen Woith of Lakeview Museum was answering some of our questions about the museum(“Museum Partners answer readers’ questions (Pt. 1)”). Did anyone notice there was never a “Part 2” to that post? That’s because I never received any further information from Ms. Woith, unfortunately. She said she was waiting to hear back from some other people on some of the questions, but then I never heard from her again.

In fairness, from reading the comments, it didn’t look like she was changing anyone’s mind about the museum, so perhaps she felt it wasn’t worth the time. As one commenter said, “some answers just beg more questions.” Still, I will try to follow up on the original unanswered questions and try to bring that series of posts to a resolution.

Museum Square

Quote of the Day

Martin Luther King, Jr.
“There is nothing more dangerous than to build a society, with a large segment of people in that society, who feel that they have no stake in it; who feel that they have nothing to lose. People who have a stake in their society, protect that society, but when they don’t have it, they unconsciously want to destroy it.”

— Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Police are 2 for 2 in 2007 for finding homicide suspects

If you’re looking for a silver lining to the dark cloud of two homicides within two weeks in Peoria, it can be found in the fact that police have a suspect in custody for each case. There are still 11 homicides from 2006 that remain unsolved with nary a suspect.

Within a week after this year’s first homicide, police arrested Bryce K. Lowder of 1017 W. Wilcox Ave. “on a charge of murder in connection with the slaying of 18-year-old DeAndre T. Allen,” according to the 1/7/07 Journal Star. Today the paper reports that “Shane L. Heuck, 1711 N. Douglas St., was booked on a charge of first-degree murder in connection with the death of Virginia K. Mallow.”

Let’s just hope now that the state’s attorney will do a good job prosecuting them and get a couple of convictions.

Hinton tells Journal Star retirement rumors untrue

Jennifer Davis reports in her Word on the Street column today that Ken Hinton is denying rumors that he will retire in February. In case you haven’t heard, the rumor goes like this: Due to health problems, Ken Hinton is planning to retire February 1 on the condition that he gets to name his successor, Associate Superintendent Herschel Hannah.

“Please write something about it,” Hinton said when we broached the rumor with him this week. “First I heard I was retiring in February, and then I heard it was due to poor health. None of that is true.”

If he isn’t retiring, then a good case could be made for the school board to fire him instead. In an earlier post, frequent commenter PrairieCelt made this compelling argument:

Hinton should be terminated, immediately. If he were employed in the private sector as CEO of an organization and made a unilateral decision to expend over 85% of the organization’s limited funds earmarked for replacement and upgrade of plant and equipment, undertook the acquisition of several parcels of real estate for his planned development (without prior board approval) based on a nonexistent agreement with another organization, and then had the whole undertaking blow up in his face, he would have been fired on the spot.

In fact, if the BOE is unable to replace the hard-earned taxpayer dollars expended on the purchase of the Prospect Road properties, dollar for dollar, Hinton should write a check to the district to cover the shortfall. Hinton is the one in the position of “public trust” and should be held to a higher standard of behavior/performance. Why should Peoria’s children have their educational futures mortgaged once again because of Hinton’s poor judgment and disastrous financial management skills?

Good questions.

Journal Star joins 21st century, adds comments section

After reading the Journal Star’s Sunday editorial on-line, I was pleasantly surprised (shocked, actually) to find that they’ve added a comments section to their editorial page; don’t know if today is the first day for that or not, but it’s the first time I’ve seen it.

All I can say is: Welcome to the 21st century, Journal Star! Glad you could join us out here in the interactive media. I’m proud to say I got to leave the first comment on Sunday’s editorial. In case you don’t want to click over to their site to read it, here it is:

First of all, congratulations on adding a comments section to your on-line editorial page!

Secondly, you’re not recognizing the fact that these “naysayers,” as you call them, are indeed for something. For example:

(1) Kellar Branch conversion: The opponents of this plan that I know (including myself) are not against a trail per se, but rather for using this rail line for economic development. The path can be built next to the rail or along a different route, but an asset like a rail line with neutral access to eight line-haul carriers can’t be replaced. The rail line not only serves Carver Lumber, but can attract light industry and manufacturing companies (read: jobs) to Pioneer Park and other points along the line, such as the newly-vacant Cohen’s furniture warehouse in the Heights. Already there are two new companies on the Kellar Branch that want to use rail service. It would be foolish to throw away this asset.

(2) Glen Oak School Siting: The East Bluff neighbors have been very clear that they are for a new school in the center of their neighborhood where the current Glen Oak School is located. They’re advocating for it to be at Frye and Wisconsin, and Bob Manning has even offered the school board city money to help site it there! I would think that kind of community involvement and city support would be celebrated by the paper, not denigrated.

(3) Downtown Museum: I have heard very few who are against having a museum downtown. However, there are many who feel that the museum needn’t take up the entire Sears block and encompasses more disciplines than it can adequately support in the space proposed. The “naysayers” are for an adequately-sized Peoria history museum on part of the Sears block with the rest of the block commercially developed with retail and residential components, just like the Heart of Peoria Plan recommended (in fact, that’s why it’s in the Heart of Peoria Plan that way — because of public input received at the charrettes). All they’re against is the ballooning of the project to an art/history/science/nature/sports/hall-of-fame museum in a building that only takes up 1/3 of the square with the rest of the block set aside for open space.

I don’t know much about the ring road, so I can’t speak to that. But in each of the cases I’ve listed, people are indeed for something, not simply against new ideas.

2007 Homicide #2: Virginia K. Mallow

A mere 13 days into the new year, and 12 days after the first homicide of 2007, a 72-year-old woman was found dead in her West Bluff home, and police have determined it was a homicide. WEEK also has this story on their website, and they’re reporting that an autopsy is scheduled for Monday.

The Journal Star identifies the victim as Virginia K. Mallow of 438 W. Doubet Ct. in Peoria. Today would have been her 73rd birthday.

This is just so unbelievably sad. What is our city coming to? What can we do to stop the violence? It must be stopped.

Whimsical history department: Richwoods

I was reading about Richwoods High School on the Historic Peoria website tonight, and it reminded me of something I hadn’t thought of in a long time.

In 1987 I was a junior at Richwoods, and the school dress code didn’t allow any students to wear shorts. Fair enough. However, the dress code did allow the girls to wear mini-skirts. Many guys saw this as a double-standard and complained pretty loudly about it, especially as the days (and the classrooms) got hotter.

At one point, several guys actually came to school in mini-skirts. That was funny, and more than a little disturbing. I didn’t participate, being more shy and reserved back then, and I’m relatively certain that Sean Matheson (who was a year behind me at Richwoods) didn’t either.

Well, the administration put a stop to that pretty quickly. So the next course of action, naturally, was for the students to go “on strike.” That’s right, they skipped class and sat out on the sidewalk in front of the school with hand-made signs to protest the “no shorts” dress code policy.

All of this garnered the school a surprising amount of local publicity. I remember seeing it on the news, and Crow Carroll even did a parody song about it to the tune of “Every Breath You Take” by The Police. (If you haven’t heard Crow Carroll parodies before, check out Wayne R. Miller’s site for some samples; “Metamora Girls” is especially good. These were a staple of local top-40 radio when I was in high school.)

Believe it or not, the little student-uprising worked, and Richwoods finally relented and allowed students to wear shorts when it got above a certain temperature. As I recall, we all considered it a great moral victory at the time. Looking back on it now, though, I think we probably could have put our efforts to better use… like, maybe, studying.

STB decides Kellar Branch dispute, reconsiders Pioneer ouster

It’s official. The Kellar Branch will remain a rail line for the foreseeable future. The Surface Transportation Board (STB) formally granted Central Illinois Railroad’s request to withdraw its discontinuance petition. That puts the final nail in the coffin of the ill-conceived plan to convert the Kellar Branch to a hiking/biking trail.

At the same time, the STB took another step back in time and reopened the case of whether Pioneer Railcorp should have been kicked off the Kellar Branch by the City two years ago. The STB found in favor of the City back in 2005 in that case and forced Pioneer off the line. But since that decision was made, the STB states, “Circumstances have changed.”

We now have evidence that Carver Lumber objects to the Cities’ plans and is dissatisfied with the service it is receiving from CIRY [Central Illinois Railroad]. According to Carver Lumber, the service is slower and more expensive, and has been subject to delays and interruptions. … [T]he Board specifically predicated its August 2005 Decision on the Cities’ statement that they would maintain the existing level of service to the satisfaction of the users of that service. In these circumstances, it is appropriate to reconsider our August 2005 Decision now that Carver Lumber’s evidence has cast doubt on the representation we had previously relied on.

Now this is quite a predicament for the City. The City’s whole purpose for kicking Pioneer off the line was so that they could turn it into a hiking trail. They fought a bitter fight with Pioneer and won. Then they signed an agreement with CIRY that they would provide service over the Kellar Branch just until a new spur was built from the Union Pacific rail line west of Pioneer Park. After that, according to the agreement, CIRY would petition the STB to discontinue service on the Kellar Branch so the rails could be torn up and the right-of-way turned into a walking path.

Well, CIRY never provided service over the Kellar Branch (causing great expense to Carver Lumber), and now they’ve withdrawn their petition to discontinue service on the branch so they can continue to use it themselves. Essentially, they’ve screwed the City twice.

Now, since the STB has reopened the whole issue of whether or not Pioneer or CIRY should be the carrier on the line, the City has to make a decision. Will they continue to fight to have Pioneer thrown off the line just so CIRY — who has royally screwed them twice — can run the line and reap the profits? Or do they now withdraw their request to kick Pioneer off the line and screw CIRY, but end up with Pioneer — the company that arguably was the key factor in scuttling their walking path plans — running the line instead?

Ha ha ha! This is too good. Who will the City choose? Park-District-plan-busting Pioneer or Double-crossing CIRY?

I, of course, vote for Pioneer, since they are the more competent of the two carriers, are locally owned, and have shown a commitment to the community (e.g., they’ve offered to help build a trail next to the rail line and provide transit/tourist service on the line). CIRY was a hired gun that endangered Peoria citizens with their runaway train, cost Carver Lumber truckloads of money, and double-crossed the City. The City owes them nothing.

The most important thing is that the Kellar Branch has effectively been saved from destruction, and now, hopefully, the City can move towards turning this asset into a money-maker — either through a long-term lease or an outright sale — and then reap the benefits of increased freight traffic (read: new businesses & jobs) along the line. If they sell it to Pioneer, maybe they’ll even get a trail next to the rail — a win-win!