Gordon gets caught in familiar trap

If I were a betting man, I would bet that Jehan Gordon doesn’t read the paper, or at least never read the paper or watched the news during the last school board election. Why?

Jehan Gordon, Democratic candidate for the 92nd District, claims in a radio spot and a mailing that she “graduated” from the University of Illinois but actually is three hours shy of an official degree, she confirmed to the Journal Star on Thursday.

Gee, didn’t someone just, like nine months ago, lose an election for doing the same thing; i.e., claiming she graduated when she hadn’t? Ms. Gordon, what were you thinking?

Because she participated in the graduation ceremony in 2004, she said she felt it was fair to say she in fact graduated even though her degree has not been officially conferred.

She went through the ceremony in 2004, and is picking up her final three hours in 2008, the same time she’s running for state office and is airing an ad saying she graduated? This kind of judgment does not instill me with a great deal of confidence in this candidate.

McCarron: Guilty on all counts

My wife just heard on the radio that Karen McCarron was found guilty on all counts: first-degree murder, obstruction of justice, and concealment of a homicide. It took the jury 11 nine hours to deliberate.

UPDATE: The Journal Star has an article up on it now. They say it was only nine hours of deliberation. 1470 WMBD also has the story — I believe this is where my wife first heard it. From WMBD:

McCarron could receive up to 100 years as a result of the conviction due to the crime being committed to a person under 12 years of age. A sentencing hearing will be scheduled.

Here’s WEEK’s coverage. And WHOI’s coverage.

Council preview: 1/22/08

Notable agenda items for the Jan. 22 meeting:

  • A new traffic light is being requested for the intersection of Carriage Lane and Allen Road. Carriage Lane is halfway between Northmoor Road and Willow Knolls Drive on Allen.
  • A new strip mall is being proposed for the corner of Knoxville and Alta roads. “No specific site plans or users are specified at this time,” but they’re going to build a 152,400 ft.2 multi-tenant building with a drive-thru. Part of land to be used will need to be annexed to the city. The neighbors don’t like it, of course. They are against the added lights, noise, garbage, drainage, and tree removal, and are concerned that this will lower their property values and quality of life.
  • The owner of Tequila’s in Chillicothe, Javier Munoz, wants to open a Mexican restaurant on Pioneer Parkway in the old Cinco de Mayo’s building. The previous owner of the building did not pay his HRA taxes, and Munoz said he had no affiliation with that owner. This is coming before the council because he’s applying for a liquor license.
  • You’ll be able to drink a glass of local wine from the Mackinaw Valley Winery while dining alfresco on the corner of State and Water if this liquor license is approved.
  • City staff wants to explore possible incentive programs to improve hospitality (i.e., hotel accommodations) downtown. Possible programs include the usual suspects (enterprise zone status, TIF, special service assessment) plus a few new ideas (“historic tax credits for buildings older than 1936,” “Civic Center supported capital expenditures,” “voluntary HRA tax to be used for capital improvements”). This should make for an interesting discussion. What was somewhat amusing was reading the litany of consultants/specialists who have told us we need better hotel accommodations downtown (Johnson Consulting, HVS consultants, PACVB, and a Six Sigma Black Belt team!). It reminds me of how many consultants said the Sears block should have urban density and mixed use.
  • The Zoning Board of Appeals and City Staff want to change the fee structure for variance requests. The board felt that the fees were too high for small, residential requests and was actually discouraging residents from applying for variances and building permits for things like decks, sheds, and fences. The staff did a survey of other communities and based on their findings, have come up with a new fee structure. The proposed fee structure would charge a lower fee for residential variances than non-residential. It would also charge a lower fee if the variance is applied for before construction begins. Sign variances would have to pay a higher fee because “Staff and Board are of the opinion that improper signage pose traffic safety and aesthetics problems.”
  • Once again, the Zoning Commission and City Staff are at odds. The first item is about a request to add an access point for 901 W. Glen Ave. It’s in what’s called an “overlay district” that restricts the number of access points purposely in order to prevent too much traffic congestion. The building owners/tenants share access points with other property owners. The staff isn’t necessarily against putting in another access point, but the petitioner (Michael Landwirth) did not submit a complete application, thus staff could not adequately review the request. Nevertheless, the Zoning Commission approved it on a 5-1 vote (Klise voted no), even though they have no idea what use is being proposed for the subject property. So now the council will have to sort it out.
  • The second split decision is the Missouri Ave. project requested by Floyd Rashid. He wants to have a parcel that contains a vacant house on the corner of Missouri and War Memorial rezoned from residential to neighborhood commercial, or “CN,” under the Land Development Code. The residents on Missouri are opposed, and the Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to deny the rezoning. But City staff points out that it’s consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, is adjacent to existing CN zoning to the east, and under the Land Development Code would be a small-scale development that would be compatible with the residential neighborhood. This should also be an interesting discussion.

Although not on the agenda, no doubt there will be some discussion under new business about what the process will be to replace outgoing City Manager Randy Oliver.

Oliver resigns

More later. But for now, here’s the letter of resignation.

UPDATE 9:24 p.m.: Randy Oliver held a press conference today to announce his resignation as Peoria City Manager effective February 15. No council members nor the Mayor were in attendance. When asked why he’s leaving, he responded by saying, “I have other things I want to do.” When asked “what other things,” he said “consulting.” Later in the conference he elaborated, saying that he used to do consulting work and enjoyed it, but it required him to travel a lot. Since he had young children at the time, all the traveling wasn’t so good. Now that his kids are grown, his wife can travel with him when he does consulting work.

He had a lot of very nice things to say about Peoria, about the City’s staff, and even about the Council and Mayor. He said “the power of Peoria is in the people,” and emphasized how much he likes Peoria and will miss the people and neighborhood groups here. He also gave a lot of credit to his staff for his accomplishments, repeating several times that the good things they’ve done have been a “team effort.”

When asked if he was resigning because he would have been fired anyway or because he was being bullied to leave, he said, “the Council and I have a wonderful working relationship,” and, “I never get bullied.” He did allow that you can’t please everyone, certainly not eleven people. He considers an 8-3 vote a landslide. Interestingly, though, he also said during the press conference that it’s his policy to not disagree publicly with the Council.

I asked him about recent reports that he interviewed for a job in McKinney, Texas. I said that often when you’re looking for another job, you don’t want your current employer to know, but then asked, now that he’s tendering his resignation and secrecy is no longer necessary, does he still stand by his story that he has not been seeking employment elsewhere? He’s usually pretty smooth at answering questions, but this one seemed to make him stammer a bit. He said that he’ll have to work with recruiters in the future, and thus, “I don’t want to get into what I may or may not have done and what they may or may not have done.” He said he didn’t think the issue was germane to his resignation announcement.

He’s giving 30 days notice in order to provide time to train an interim and/or permanent replacement, resulting in a “smooth, orderly transition.” He was asked what he felt his biggest accomplishments were. He listed off a few things: the “new doctors’ building on the med school campus,” “annexations that have increased our tax base,” the Southtown property sale, the “noise impounds and boots” (referring to the City’s policy of impounding cars that violate the noise ordinance and booting cars that have unpaid parking tickets), the Museum Square deal (even though it’s not built yet, he pointed to his efforts to get Caterpillar to agree to demolish the Sears block instead of the city), and the special assessment along Radnor and Wilhelm roads.

The question now is, what happens next? Some people think Planning and Growth Director Pat Landes would be a good choice for an interim or possibly permanent City Manager, while others are saying that retired Caterpillar executive Henry Holling is likely to get the nod for the interim. Mayor Ardis said, “We [the council] will meet next week to try and select an interim [City Manager]. I imagine we’ll do a national search similar to what we did when we hired Randy,” for a permanent replacement.

Oliver to hold news conference today

I received this e-mail from the city today:

City Manager Randy Oliver will be holding a news conference today (1/16) at 3:00 p.m. in his office.

What do you think this is about? I got an anonymous tip last night that Randy resigned yesterday effective immediately. However, when I e-mailed Randy about it, he told me he is still with the City of Peoria. And, of course, there has been a lot of speculation surrounding him selling his house and a report in the Dallas newspaper that he was a finalist for a city manager job in McKinney, Texas. Throughout it all, he’s steadfastly denied that he’s looking for another job, interviewing anywhere else, or making any plans to leave Peoria.

Maybe this press conference isn’t about any of that. But I can’t imagine what else it would be.

UPDATE: Jonathan Ahl reports that Oliver is in fact resigning.

UPDATE 2: I got another e-mail from the city: “The News Conference has been moved to Council Chambers at 3:00 today instead of the City Manager’s Office.”

The pedestrian experience: University

About a month ago, I had to take my car in for some repair at the Honda dealership on Pioneer Parkway. While it was in the shop, I decided to try to get around town without a vehicle. That experiment didn’t last too long.

It was over the weekend, and I needed to go into work on a Saturday. I decided to try taking the bus. It was scheduled to arrive about five minutes to nine, so I started to the bus stop at a quarter till. It doesn’t take but maybe four minutes to walk to the bus stop, and I can see the intersection while I’m walking to it. Before I’ve walked for even two minutes, I see the bus go by. It came early — almost ten minutes early. Since it was a Saturday, the buses only run once an hour.

Well, I only live about two and a half miles from work, and I figured I could walk there in less than an hour, so I started off north on University from Columbia Terrace. I was walking on the west side of the road, down the hill, over the interstate, and up to Nebraska. Looking across Nebraska, I could see that there was no sidewalk next to the cemetery, but there was a sidewalk on the east side of the street, so I crossed at the light.

Now I’m walking north on the east side of University. The sidewalk is narrow — about four feet across — and it abuts the roadway where cars are going by at roughly 40-45 miles per hour. The sidewalk is uneven, crumbling in places, and completely missing on a couple of parcels. If anyone were trying to navigate this in a wheelchair, it would be impossible… and impassible, for that matter.

But the coup de grĂ¢ce was when I was approaching McClure. Remember, there is no signaled intersection at which to cross University between Nebraska and McClure. City crews were doing some roadwork north of McClure on the east side of the road, meaning I was going to have to cross back to the west side of University to avoid them. There was just one problem — before I could get to the intersection, there was a large orange sign completely blocking the sidewalk. The city crews, in order to alert drivers that there was road work ahead, had put up a large, temporary orange sign right smack in the middle of the sidewalk. The only way around it was to walk in the yard or the street. If a person were in a wheelchair, there would be no way around it at all.

At that point, my mother-in-law happened to be driving by with my kids in her car, and they saw me walking along the road and stopped to pick me up, so my pedestrian experience came to an end.

Conclusion: Peoria really needs to improve its sidewalks and its mass transit service. The buses need to be more frequent, and the sidewalks need to be repaired and maintained — and made ADA-compliant. The city is starting to focus on the sidewalk issue, and in fact just had a policy session about sidewalks last night. CityLink, meanwhile, is looking at adding more destinations. I think it would be better for them to focus on improving their bus stops and the frequency of their buses.

Ahl: WTVP has been losing $288,000/year on average

Now this is what I call good journalism. Jonathan Ahl of public radio station WCBU has an analysis of WTVP’s crisis based on IRS reports the station has submitted over the past several years. It sure sheds a lot of light on possible reasons Bank of America is calling the loan to the station, and why the station can’t get enough financing elsewhere.

Kudos to Jonathan on finding and reporting this information!

League of Women Voters debate: Schock scores

Another live debate with the candidates of the 18th Congressional District took place last night, this time on WEEK-TV with questions asked by WEEK’s Mike Dimmick and the Journal Star’s Christine Smith.

I thought Schock really shined at this debate. He answered all the questions directly and substantively and came across as the competent, ready-for-Congress candidate his campaign literature describes. It’s worth mentioning that there were no questions about foreign policy at this debate. McConoughey did well substantively, but was a little weak in his answer to the earmarks question, and as always struggled a bit with style. Morris was exactly the same as previous debates, alternately repeating his well-worn talking points and taking potshots at Schock, rarely answering a question directly. On that last point, Dimmick was manifestly exasperated by Morris’s doublespeak more than once during the debate.

Morris had another faux pas. He likes to talk about Article I of the Constitution and seems to bring it up in every debate. But we learned last night he’s not quite as well versed on Article V. While the candidates discussed what Constitutional amendments they would support, Schock mentioned that he would support a pro-life amendment. Morris immediately criticized Schock, questioning how he could support Giuliani — a pro-choice candidate — for President. Said Morris, with a pro-choice President, a pro-life amendment “would never pass.” Yet the President has nothing to do with the process for passing a Constitutional amendment. Here’s the complete text of Article V of the Constitution:

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

Note that the President’s approval or even assent is not necessary, nor does it necessarily help an amendment get enacted. Bush has proposed several amendments that have not gone anywhere — e.g., flag-burning amendment, marriage amendment. All he can do is support it or advocate for it, but it’s up to the Congress and the state legislatures to make it happen.

The more debates there are, the more I feel the race becomes more of a two-man contest between Schock and McConoughey. I’m still supporting McConoughey, but I’m willing to acknowledge that Schock performed a little better in this debate.

No smoking law hits local business

I had lunch recently at Kelleher’s Irish Pub. It’s smoke-free now, in compliance with a law that went into effect Jan. 1 in Illinois. In talking with owner Pat Sullivan, he shared that his revenues so far this year are down 12-15%, and he’s concerned. If they continue that way, he may have to start laying some people off. Isn’t it ironic that legislation that was supposed to benefit employees may instead end up costing them their jobs? Who could have seen that coming?

Will AT&T video service be coming to Peoria?

AT&T LogoOn June 30 last year, the Cable and Video Competition Law of 2007 was enacted, allowing a video service provider to apply for a state franchise license instead of having to negotiate with individual municipalities like cable companies have traditionally done. Since then, only one company has petitioned the Illinois Commerce Commission for a state franchise license: Illinois Bell Telephone Company, doing business as AT&T Illinois. They applied on September 24 and were granted a franchise license on October 25.

So the obvious question is, where in Illinois will they be rolling out their new video service? Answer: that’s confidential. According to the application:

An exact description of the video service area where video service will be offered by AT&T Illinois … is designated as Confidential and Proprietary. This designation is necessary to avoid public disclosure of the areas in which AT&T Illinois plans to offer video service before it has begun to offer service in those areas. Disclosure of information regarding the areas that AT&T Illinois plans to offer video service … would put AT&T Illinois at a competitive disadvantage and cause competitive harm, since cable and other competitors could use such information to target the marketing of their own, existing services in areas in which AT&T Illinois plans to provide service but before AT&T Illinois has had an opportunity to initiate service in those areas.

So we won’t know if Peoria is one of the service areas unless and until it’s actually rolled out. However, the local unit of government will get at least 10 days of advance notice.

What we do know is that it is already being rolled out in the St. Louis Metro East area. According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, AT&T Illinois’ TV service, branded as “U-Verse,” was made available starting Monday, January 7:

The plan is to gain experience running U-Verse here and then roll it out across Illinois. Mitchell has said he hopes it’ll be in Chicago by the end of March, though there’s no firm timeline for broader expansions. … Citing competitive concerns, Mitchell wouldn’t say exactly where or how fast AT&T plans to expand, but it will start in parts of 17 Metro East municipalities, including Belleville, East St. Louis, Collinsville and Glen Carbon, though not Edwardsville, Alton or Granite City. It first picked dense areas where it already has a network, Mitchell says, and plans to grow from there.

AT&T’s U-Verse system is internet-based and delivered to the home through phone wires, either fiber optic directly to the house, or copper wires from the house to a nearby node that’s connected to fiber optic line. You can see an example of the kinds of packages they offer by clicking here, and a sample channel lineup can be seen by clicking here (PDF).