Daily Archives: July 3, 2009

City of Peoria, Economic Development

Enterprise Zone answers raise more questions

2 Comments

Back in May, Peoria’s Economic Development director Craig Hullinger asked District 150 to be a part of the Enterprise Zone for the Main Street Commons project, and I wrote this post in response. Craig, who is a really nice guy and very communicative, wrote me and we had an interesting e-mail exchange. He asked me if he could post it on his blog (did I mention he’s very communicative?), and I said that was fine with me, so here it is. I’m not sure why his post is dated September of 2008 because we didn’t have our discussion until just the last couple of months. Perhaps he just updated an old post.

Anyway, I was rereading it today, and now I have some more questions. For example, Craig says:

Any development is risky. The safest developments are on undeveloped land (green grass sites). It is easier to buy a large tract of land. Less likely to have costly environmental problems hidden underground. Urban redevelopment is always more difficult. It is harder to assemble the land – usually multiple owners. Older areas have more poverty and crime.

I think you can see that this is true by comparing the level of development in the suburban areas of Peoria versus the older areas. More development takes place in new areas. It is always a struggle to get investment in older areas. We try to equalize the difference between new and old with incentives.

Now look at this map of the current Enterprise Zone:

EZ map 2 28 09

Notice the big red area up in the far north part of town? Up there where there are green grass sites? Where it is easier to buy a large tract of land? Where it is less likely to have costly environmental problems hidden underground? Up where they, in short, need no incentives?

Why is the Enterprise Zone up there?

And furthermore, doesn’t that just step all over the theory of “equaliz[ing] the difference between new and old with incentives”? If a developer can get the same incentives up where there’s a green field, doesn’t that kind of “equalization” work against redeveloping the older parts of town?

One more question, for the record. Craig said:

There is a good market. We hired the premier market research firm, Tracy Cross, to assess the market for new close into downtown housing. They said the market was strong, for creative class young professionals, but that renters lead the urban renaissance, and that the rents had to be about $1.00 a square foot. It is hard to build a quality brick building that will rent for that rate without incentives.

So, we can expect this development to be a “quality brick building” now that these incentives are in place? And that rents will be competitive? So noted. I’ll be referring back to this post when the construction materials are made public. When I asked at the public meeting what materials would be used, I was told they hadn’t decided yet.

Uncategorized

Who follows fireworks laws?

5 Comments

Every year around July 4, area newspapers run articles on fireworks safety (like this one), including the reminder that nearly all fireworks are illegal in the state; and those that are legal are probably illegal in your city. And every year, hundreds of area residents light sparklers, shoot off bottle rockets, and set off firecrackers anyway.

Next to speed limits, the most blatantly disregarded laws are arguably those against fireworks. Where I used to live, one of my neighbors would set off roman candles right on the street. And he was a police officer.

Since the states surrounding the Land of Lincoln have fewer restrictions on fireworks, Illinoisans can easily get an arsenal of pyrotechnics — in Missouri, especially. In fact, there are huge retailers that sell nothing but fireworks, and part of their marketing is to encourage Illinois residents to get their explosives before crossing the border.

And that’s apparently just what Illinoisans do. Every July 3, both before and after the Park District’s big fireworks display in Glen Oak Park, there are all kinds of skyrockets going off in the surrounding neighborhoods. And every July 4, you can hear all kinds of firecrackers going off until well into the evening. There seems to be a tacit consensus among residents that, as long as you’re not keeping your neighbors up at night, we’re not going to snitch on you.

After all, it is ironic that fireworks are iconic of American independence and freedom, yet are illegal. Perhaps that cognitive dissonance is what makes people so accepting of fireworks scofflaws. On the other hand, some will point to those who have been seriously injured or killed by fireworks as a justification for outlawing them. Fair enough. But generally speaking, injuries and death (and property damage, for that matter) occur because people are misusing fireworks (for example, shooting them off inside a house underneath the door to a fraternity brother’s room), and if we outlawed everything that could lead to injury or death if misused, we’d have to outlaw a whole lot of things, starting with bathtubs.

Don’t get me wrong — I’m not advocating breaking the law. I’m just acknowledging reality. On Independence Day, people are going to shoot off fireworks. They do it every year, despite media reminders that it’s illegal.

That said, have a fun and safe Fourth of July holiday weekend! I would encourage you all to enjoy legal fireworks displays at Glen Oak Park tonight and the Peoria Riverfront tomorrow. They’re better than anything you can buy at that big retailer in Missouri anyway.

Happy birthday, America!