It’s official. The Kellar Branch will remain a rail line for the foreseeable future. The Surface Transportation Board (STB) formally granted Central Illinois Railroad’s request to withdraw its discontinuance petition. That puts the final nail in the coffin of the ill-conceived plan to convert the Kellar Branch to a hiking/biking trail.
At the same time, the STB took another step back in time and reopened the case of whether Pioneer Railcorp should have been kicked off the Kellar Branch by the City two years ago. The STB found in favor of the City back in 2005 in that case and forced Pioneer off the line. But since that decision was made, the STB states, “Circumstances have changed.”
We now have evidence that Carver Lumber objects to the Cities’ plans and is dissatisfied with the service it is receiving from CIRY [Central Illinois Railroad]. According to Carver Lumber, the service is slower and more expensive, and has been subject to delays and interruptions. … [T]he Board specifically predicated its August 2005 Decision on the Cities’ statement that they would maintain the existing level of service to the satisfaction of the users of that service. In these circumstances, it is appropriate to reconsider our August 2005 Decision now that Carver Lumber’s evidence has cast doubt on the representation we had previously relied on.
Now this is quite a predicament for the City. The City’s whole purpose for kicking Pioneer off the line was so that they could turn it into a hiking trail. They fought a bitter fight with Pioneer and won. Then they signed an agreement with CIRY that they would provide service over the Kellar Branch just until a new spur was built from the Union Pacific rail line west of Pioneer Park. After that, according to the agreement, CIRY would petition the STB to discontinue service on the Kellar Branch so the rails could be torn up and the right-of-way turned into a walking path.
Well, CIRY never provided service over the Kellar Branch (causing great expense to Carver Lumber), and now they’ve withdrawn their petition to discontinue service on the branch so they can continue to use it themselves. Essentially, they’ve screwed the City twice.
Now, since the STB has reopened the whole issue of whether or not Pioneer or CIRY should be the carrier on the line, the City has to make a decision. Will they continue to fight to have Pioneer thrown off the line just so CIRY — who has royally screwed them twice — can run the line and reap the profits? Or do they now withdraw their request to kick Pioneer off the line and screw CIRY, but end up with Pioneer — the company that arguably was the key factor in scuttling their walking path plans — running the line instead?
Ha ha ha! This is too good. Who will the City choose? Park-District-plan-busting Pioneer or Double-crossing CIRY?
I, of course, vote for Pioneer, since they are the more competent of the two carriers, are locally owned, and have shown a commitment to the community (e.g., they’ve offered to help build a trail next to the rail line and provide transit/tourist service on the line). CIRY was a hired gun that endangered Peoria citizens with their runaway train, cost Carver Lumber truckloads of money, and double-crossed the City. The City owes them nothing.
The most important thing is that the Kellar Branch has effectively been saved from destruction, and now, hopefully, the City can move towards turning this asset into a money-maker — either through a long-term lease or an outright sale — and then reap the benefits of increased freight traffic (read: new businesses & jobs) along the line. If they sell it to Pioneer, maybe they’ll even get a trail next to the rail — a win-win!
Let’s hope this issue doesn’t drag on for many more months. If the STB recognizes the facts,that CIRY has not lived up to its contract with the city (or even has one), then at the very least, Pioneer should be allowed to re-enter into a lease agreement with the City. At best, the rail line should be sold to Pioneer.
I don’t expect trail proponents to give up, though.
I should have mentioned that the deadline for the City and CIRY to present their evidence (if the City decides to take CIRY’s side in this dispute) is February 12, and then Pioneer and Carver Lumber have until March 5 to reply.
I’m hoping that the City requests that their original petition be withdrawn — just like CIRY did. Ooooh, what delicious irony that would be. In the words of Khan, “Revenge is a dish best served cold.”
Before we just sell to Pioneer, let’s but the whole line on the public market and see what the market does with the opportunity to provide services to the untold companies that are just waiting to relocate along a rail line.
While there’s a bit of sarcasm at the end, I do think that we need to sell it to the highest bidder not just hand it over to Pioneer Rail.
Peo Proud — I don’t believe there’s a big market for this line. In fact, I think Pioneer is the only company that has shown interest in buying it. But hypothetically, if there are other interested parties, sure, let the bidding begin.
Everybody take a deep breath and hold it for a few days to see what shakes out of the trees. Nothing is written in stone as yet. When it is finished and a done deal with the STB for sure, LET’S PARTY !!!!
About a poll of the at-large candidates to see what their vote on this issue would be?
The line was “put up for bid” before, and it brought us CIRY as an operator. Isn’t it time to stick with a proven, competent, local operator? We don’t need another runaway train presided over by a convicted felon from out-of-town. And PIRY still has a arguable claim to an easement being litigated. It’s time to end this once and for all, people.
Over $500,000 for the line sounds really good to me. I think that competitive bidding would produce a lower price. Look at the amount they charge per railcar delivered, the expense of engines, people, track maintenance, etc. and I sure can’t see how much more than $1 is a fair price for the whole thing.
Even IF many more businesses get going with rail deliveries, that’s a lot of money to recoup.
Parceling out the pieces to adjoining homeowners and businesses might make a fortune, but they can’t sell it off without the STB’s approval.That won’t happen. Even so, can you imagine the expenses related to surveying, etc.?
And how about that story in today’s (Saturday) Propaganda Star, self-proclaimed paragon of “integrity”
I can’t wait to see the lies and nonsense in tomorrow’s editorial.
What story? I must have missed it.