All posts by C. J. Summers

I am a fourth-generation Peorian, married with three children.

The Pacific Institute in District 150 under scrutiny

Rev. Harvey Burnett of New Bethel Church of God in Christ objects to District 150 using a training program from The Pacific Institute, based in Seattle, Washington, and used by many large corporations around the world, including Boeing and Caterpillar. He says on his blog:

The focus of the 21 Keys program [from The Pacific Institute] is similar to that of cultic religious indoctrination practices, offering affirmations and assimilation techniques and a targeted deprogramming of traditional values. This is unacceptable at the Public School Level and could potentially be a violation of law.

Rev. Burnett would like “Peoria Public School District 150 to reconsider their relationship with the Pacific Institute and at the very least NOT implement any of their programs with our Public Schools.” He’s a little late on that count. While the founder of The Pacific Institute, Louis Tice, is speaking in Peoria today at 1:00, which is why this program is getting a little more publicity all of a sudden, this is not a new program at District 150. It was approved by the school board about a year and a half ago. Here’s what the December 4, 2006, school board meeting minutes state:

PACIFIC INSTITUTE – Moved by Spangler, seconded by Stowell that the Administration be authorized to enter into a Contract with the Pacific Institute for the use and implementation of the Pacific Institute’s BASIC LEARNING PROGRAM, YOUTH PROGRAM AND SCHOOL SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM.

Dr. Fischer explained that Caterpillar has graciously underwritten the cost of the program for the first year. The first year will implement the Pacific Institute’s Basic Learning Program, Youth Program and School Sponsorship Program. Mr. Hinton explained that phase two financing is still to be determined. Dr. Fischer stated that the program fits well into the Strategic Plan and the District will benefit even if the second phase is not initiated.

On roll call, 7 ayes. Motion carried.

As the September 17, 2007, school board meeting minutes explain, this training was part of, or perhaps became a part of the district’s School Improvement Plans. During the part of the meeting where an update was given on these plans, Associate Superintendent Dr. Cindy Fischer had this to say:

Dr. Fischer reported that all principals have been trained in the Pacific Institute “Investment in Excellence.” The focus of that training is to change the culture in the building. Two buildings have been through the Pacific Institute “21 Keys” training and the District has made a “bold goal” that each teacher will have the opportunity to attend the 21 Keys training.

The October 1, 2007, school board meeting featured further discussion on the training:

5. GOAL 5 – CULTURE OF CUSTOMER SERVICE – CULTURE TO DRIVE INVESTMENT IN EXCELLENCE – Dr. Fischer, Dr. Hannah and Mrs. Sanfilip presented information on driving the culture of an organization to achieve excellence. The District has been working with Pacific Institute to move the style of leadership from passive/defensive or aggressive/defensive to constructive.

Let’s stop here for a second. These terms deserve a little explanation. District 150 published a flyer called “The Pacific Institute: An Overview for Peoria Public Schools” that is available from the district’s website. It explains these different styles of leadership:

A Constructive Culture

  • Pursues standard of excellence
  • Fosters innovation
  • Reinforces personal responsibility and accountability for performance
  • Open, candid discussion and decision-making
  • Leadership facilitates goal accomplishment rather than manages (monitoring activities)

An Aggressive/Defensive Culture

  • Inactive/Reactive
  • Creates overhead
  • Focus on blame
  • Maintain the status quo

A Passive/Defensive Culture

  • Reactive
  • Hierarchical
  • Critical
  • Punitive
  • Political
  • Unrealistic

They then say that Peoria Public Schools’ current culture is an equal mix of all three types of leadership styles, but that they are striving to be completely a “Constructive Culture.” Now, back to the October 1 minutes:

The Central Administrative Team has been through leadership facilitator training to develop a mission statement and values for the District. The building principals have completed Investment in Excellence and are working on Vision and Value Building and will take part in the leadership impact survey and coaching in November. They also will take part in the 21 Keys Facilitator Training in October. Kellar, Irving and Transition to Success teachers have completed the 21 Keys program. Our BOLD GOAL is that all teachers will go through 21 Keys and Achieving Your Potential by September 2008. It is also hoped that community members, volunteers and parents have a chance to participate in the training.

Dr. Fischer stated that to achieve our goals they need from the Board the continued commitment to the vision and values and then work on moving the culture. Also, consensus and support of the Bold Goal that all teachers go through the 21 Keys and Achieving Your Potential.

Dr. Fisher stated that if organizations, businesses or people would like to donate, things needed would be – an offsite location for the training, lunches for the three day training and help with purchasing the materials. We will be using District trainers to hold down the cost.

As was earlier stated, Caterpillar paid for the first year of training, and there was uncertainty at the time as to how “phase two” would be funded. According to the PPS’ Pacific Institute flyer, which was undated, apparently at some point it was decided that no school funds would be expended on the program:

The Peoria Public School District 150 Foundation has agreed to fundraise for the training. Additional community members have and are stepping forward to donate facilities, food, snacks, and payment for curriculum.

As far as it being eastern mysticism in disguise, it might be interesting to ask the staff at St. Mark Catholic School. They adopted the training in early 2006, according to a May 5, 2006, Journal Star article:

First, [St. Mark’s] entire staff of teachers and principal went through an Investment in Excellence program in January. Last weekend, some 40 of its junior high students went home with the new realization that they are in control of their own destinies, through a Pathways to Excellence program.

The teachers will complete another seminar, 21 Steps, this summer in which they will take what they’ve learned from the first program and incorporate it into the kindergarten through eighth-grade curriculum.

The excellence programs were introduced to the school by Caterpillar Inc. employee Steve Pierz, who is on the school’s education commission. He enlisted the help of his friend and colleague Stan Budzinski and information technology supervisor Kim Utzinger, who also presented the Pathways program.

As an aside, it was interesting to me that Caterpillar’s name came up every time this training was mentioned. It appears Cat is the local evangelist for The Pacific Institute. They’re spreading the good news of positive “self-talk” to public and parochial schools alike. But I digress.

Indeed, the mission statement of The Pacific Institute doesn’t betray any eastern or New Age thinking in and of itself:

We affirm the right of all individuals to achieve their God-given potential. The application of our education empowers people to recognize their ability to choose growth, freedom and personal excellence. We commit ourselves to providing this education, all over the world, through all means that are just and appropriate.

But when you actually look at the curriculum, as Rev. Burnett has done, it does show that its methods are New-Age-ish (religious syncretism, mind over matter, etc.), and thus could undermine values that are being taught in the home, especially Christian values. From what I’ve read, it’s basically the old “power of positive thinking” repackaged; only this time their claim is that the methods are based on “the latest research from the cognitive sciences.”

Stripped of the methodology, I don’t see any problem with kids learning that they’re responsible for their own attitudes and learning. However, I see honest self-talk as much more valuable than simply positive self-talk. This may be apocryphal, but I heard once that tests showed U.S. children had some of the lowest achievement scores, but had the highest self-esteem of kids in any nation. The district needs more than positive thinking and psychotherapy to make AYP.

This whole thing leaves me with two questions. First, how much time is being spent on this training per school year, and might that time be better spent on core curriculum? Secondly, how effective can The Pacific Institute’s training be if the central administration has gone through it and is still the antithesis of a “Constructive Culture”?

$3.95

High Gas PricesA gallon of gasoline is $3.95 today. In a couple weeks it will no doubt be over $4. It’s getting to the point that I can’t afford to drive anymore. Unfortunately, in Peoria, not driving leaves you with very few options.

There’s bicycling, as the paper profiled today. There are limitations to that, however. Winter (and other weather-related obstacles) comes immediately to mind. Proximity is another problem; depending on where you work or shop, it may simply be too far to reasonably bike. If it’s only moderately far, there’s the additional problem of showing up all sweaty — that may not be appropriate for certain destinations, like your job, for instance.

There’s walking, which is even more dependent on proximity. Pedestrians are further hampered by the poor condition and intermittency of sidewalks, if they exist at all.

Then there’s public transportation. This should be the preferred alternative to driving. Unfortunately, in Peoria the bus service is slow, infrequent, and often inconvenient. As I’ve stated before, “This isn’t all the bus company’s fault. Part of the problem is sprawl and lack of pedestrian infrastructure (e.g., sidewalks), which is a city planning problem. Just like sprawl puts a strain on police, fire, and snow removal service, it puts a huge strain on bus service.”

Nevertheless, with gas prices continuing to climb, Peoria is going to have to get serious about planning and providing infrastructure for alternative transportation methods. Otherwise, people are going to want to move someplace more sustainable, and people with options will.

Hullinger spreading the good news

I don’t think there’s a bigger cheerleader for Peoria than Economic Development Director Craig Hullinger. He’s trying to reach people through every method possible; he’s even using Blogger to set up a pseudo-blog for the Economic Development department. Now, he’s started directly e-mailing the media, including bloggers, with good economic news about Peoria. Here’s what he had to say:

The median home price rose in 10.4% in Peoria in the 1st Quarter of 2008, compared to the first quarter of 2007, according to USA Today on May 14, 2008.

Peoria had the second highest growth rate in the country, according to the article, which used data collected by the National Association of Realtors.

Nationally, the median home price fell 7.7% over the same period.

Thanks to all who helped make our economy so vibrant. Keep investing.

Now, if we could just get more mixed use development underway in the Heart of Peoria in the Warehouse District, Renaissance Park, and the Rivefront.

A great opportunity out there to start up the Heart of Peoria Development Corporation. Raise capital to make strategic investments in the City. Take advantage of the great Enterprise Zone, TIF, and historic tax credit incentives. Do well while doing good.

Keep the upbeat and positive news coming, Mr. Hullinger.

Council preview 5/13/08

The agenda for tonight’s meeting isn’t too exciting, although there are a few potentially volatile issues. There’s a really long consent agenda (A through GG, or 33 items), which is to be expected after the council hasn’t met for three weeks.

District 150 is on the agenda — there’s an item requesting the creation of a Neighborhood Impact Zone (NIZ) around Glen Oak School and revision of the timeline for implementing other such zones. You may recall that the NIZ plan is a partnership between the City of Peoria and District 150 (and possibly Tri-County Regional Planning) to “collectively provide resources to stabilize and enhance the two square block area surrounding the school site to provide a safe, vibrant, attractive neighborhood.” I wonder if any council members will take that opportunity to question the school board’s shortening of the school day for 12 primary schools. I mean, the city has committed no small amount of time, effort, and money toward this initiative, the idea being to stabilize neighborhoods and ultimately draw more families into District 150. If the D150 administration is going to undermine those efforts by reducing teacher contact time and arts and music programs, one has to wonder if this is the best use of the city’s funds after all.

The “Knoxville Crossing” strip mall is going to be taken off the table tonight. This project is way out north on the west side of Knoxville/Route 40, north of Alta Rd., south of Wilhelm Rd. It had been tabled a few weeks ago because the neighbors opposed the project. According to the Journal Star, they’re still unhappy about it, but feel the development is inevitable:

Liverpool Drive resident Tim Sander said on Wednesday, “I don’t think anyone really wants it. (Neighbors) know they can’t stop it, but they’re trying to get the best they can as far as keeping their quality of life.”

Developers have the public trained well, don’t they? Neighbors don’t even put up a fight anymore. They have plenty of reasons to believe such a fight would be futile (Glen Hollow, Midtown Plaza, to name just a couple).

One might question why we need more big box stores and strip mall storefronts when we have so many empty ones already. Does the city ever do any kind of cost/revenue analysis to see if this is going to be a net gain or loss for the city? This will put pressure on the city to use limited funds to upgrade the infrastructure in that area, and yet what new businesses will it be bringing into the area? How much tax revenue will it generate? If businesses are just going to move from one area to another within the city leaving vacant storefronts in their wake, the city ends up losing money because they’re not gaining enough net sales tax revenue to sustain all the northern growth.

Of course, the big thing on the agenda tonight is Elliott’s strip club asking for a liquor license again. If the council denies it as the Liquor Commission has recommended, you can bet that the taxpayers will end up paying dearly for it. I actually agree with the Journal Star’s editorial on this issue. The fact is, the strip club isn’t going away even if they don’t get a liquor license, and it will undeniably lead to a lawsuit that the city will almost assuredly lose. I’d rather not add insult to injury by having my tax money go to Elliott’s. Let this one go and work on some sort of ordinance that will keep this sort of thing from happening in the future.

D150 parents to try negotiation first

Monday night there was a big meeting at Godfather’s Pizza to discuss strategies for getting the District 150 School Board to reverse their decision to cut 45 minutes out of the school day for 12 primary schools. The charge was led by Diane Vespa, who reports the outcome of the meeting on her blog:

Ultimately, we were persuaded to “call off the dogs” and place them on a back burner, for now. In the interim, we will meet a few more times to explore options for saving $600K. We don’t anticipate this to be too difficult of an undertaking given the fact that it is less than 1/2 of 1% of their budget. There is a meeting scheduled with the District for May 22. The goal: a full rescission of last Mondays vote.

If negotiations fail, things could get ugly. In the past week, there have been calls for everything from picketing to a city takeover of the school district. Those more extreme measures are on hold for now, in hopes that the board will reverse their decision and find a way to balance the budget that doesn’t rob kindergarten through fourth grade students of teacher contact time.

I think it’s a good idea to try negotiations first, but we must, at the same time, keep the heat up. We won’t let the administration razzle-dazzle us like they did the school board last Monday night.

Downtown Promises: One Technology Plaza

One Technology PlazaI’m going to start looking at some projects that were promised to bring revitalization to downtown Peoria and see how they turned out. Did they deliver what was promised? Today, we’re going to look at One Technology Plaza, on the corner of Adams and Fulton where the old Bergner store used to be.

When that idea was first pitched in 1997, the Journal Star said the plan “to demolish the [Bergner] block and build an eight-story, $25 million career and technology center sounds precisely like the boost Peoria’s downtown needs,” adding the hopeful questions, “might this become a piece of an I-74 Technology Corridor?”

Many others sang the praises of the project, assuring us that this would be the catalyst to turn downtown around and bring in new jobs and industry. Here’s a sampling:

The L-shaped building, with main entrances on both Northeast Adams and Fulton streets “will reinvent downtown,” said commission Chairman Jim Baldwin.

“It will fill in the retail gap” in the downtown area with 17,000 square feet of street-level store space, said city Riverfront Development Director Tom Tincher.

–Peoria Journal Star, March 8, 1997

“This can truly make Peoria different from any community our size” in the nation, Mayor Bud Grieves said moments after the council voted 7-1 to accept a redevelopment agreement for the project with Prudential Cullinan Ltd….

At-large Councilman Charles Grayeb [said] that the tech center “embodies one of the most aggressive, visionary, public-private partnerships ever envisioned by our city. It will put Peoria in the (technology) development forefront and produce tax dollars quickly” through the jobs and industries it will attract, he said….

Its top floor will house both major and smaller technology-based firms that Cullinan expects to lure here. Its first floor will contain 17,000 square feet of retail space.

–Peoria Journal Star, July 2, 1997

One Technology Plaza opened in September 1999. Construction was paid for with the help of $9.6 million in general obligation bonds from the city. So now that it’s eight and a half years later, how have they filled the “retail gap” downtown? What new “major and smaller technology-based firms” have been lured here?

I took a walk downtown recently to find out. The retail establishments on the ground level are: Robert Morris College Bookstore, Jimmy John’s Sandwiches, Heartland Bank, Chase Property Management, and several empty storefronts, including the recently vacated Camille’s Sidewalk Cafe.

According to the directory in the lobby off of Fulton street, the businesses in One Technology Plaza are:

  • Caterpillar (several divisions, including Global Deployment Services, Remanufacturing Division, Cat University CTT, and World Trading Corp.)
  • Robert Morris College
  • Workforce Network (City of Peoria Workforce Development Department and Central Illinois Workforce Board)
  • U. S. Attorney’s Office
  • Howard & Howard Attorneys offices
  • Cullinan Properties
  • OSF Organizational Development
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation

Several of these are the original tenants. The Regional Office of Education used to be in One Technology Plaza, but moved to the Peoria County Courthouse. The building’s offices and retail stores are open 9-5 on weekdays, and aren’t open on Saturdays or Sundays at all. It would be interesting to see how much One Technology Plaza is contributing in tax revenue to the Downtown Business District TIF.

As I look over the list of tenants, I don’t see any retail gap being filled. How many people, when they want to grab a quick Jimmy John’s lunch, think about going to One Technology Plaza, especially considering there are three other locations in Peoria that are probably more convenient? The problem is that there’s no nearby residential component to drive retail development. Any retail that locates here only caters to people who work downtown and can patronize a place during lunch. Or they have to try to draw people downtown with something really unique. Nothing unique here at One Technology Plaza.

And I certainly don’t see any new high-tech companies that have located in Peoria as a result of this multi-million dollar investment by the City. Caterpillar already has its world headquarters downtown, which is a huge asset, of course. But the promise was that new companies, large and small, would be “lured” here. Hasn’t happened. I see a lot of empty space in a soulless building.

This Downtown Promise: Unfulfilled.

New Math

Hmm, let’s see. $1.14 million for four Edison schools. We’re closing one, so the total number of Edison schools is dropping by 25%. If we take $1.14 million and divide by four (or multiply by .25), we get $285,000.

But according to the Journal Star today, the school district negotiated only “about a $200,000 savings.” That’s about 17.5% of the total contract.

Well, let’s look at percentage of pupils. The 2007 enrollments, according to the Illinois Interactive Report Card, were:

Loucks 374
Rolling Acres 312
Franklin 386
Northmoor 462
TOTAL 1534

So, 374 divided by 1534 is: 24.3%. But the contract was only reduced 17.5%.

Sounds like a great deal… for “New York-based Edison Schools,” that is. I suppose the administration will say that there are certain fixed administrative costs, so one can’t just cut the contract by 25%.

Or maybe they’ll try to tell us that 17.5% savings is just as good as 25%. After all, they’ve already told us that an 11.5% reduction in the school day provides exactly the same amount of teacher contact time, with music and art thrown in.

It’s the new math.

Roundabout

A little over a week ago, the Journal Star reported that a roundabout is being considered for the intersection of Sheridan, Loucks, and Gift in the “Sheridan Triangle” form district. This was surprising to me. I have nothing against roundabouts, but they’re not the only option or even the best option for every intersection.

You may remember that there was a public meeting back on March 5 to discuss options for improvement of the public space in this form district. Keith Covington was there along with other engineering and street design experts with experience in creating new urban streetscapes.

Everyone I talked to that night — to a person — said that a roundabout was not the best solution to this particular intersection, although they all affirmed they liked roundabouts. The problems here, it was explained to me, were several.

First of all, there wasn’t enough space. Because it’s an intersection of three streets, there’s a minimum radius that’s required to accommodate all the “legs” that would be coming off the roundabout, and that space simply isn’t available at that intersection, I was told.

Secondly, they were concerned with creating dead space in the middle of the roundabout. Going along with that big required radius would be a lot of space in the middle of which pedestrians would get no practical use.

Thirdly, no roundabout was suggested at the charrette for this area. If you look at the drawings that were produced by the neighbors and business owners during the charrette process, the vision then was to have Loucks intersect with Gift before the intersection with Sheridan on the east side (just like Loucks intersects with Forrest Hill before the University intersection), and have Gift intersect with Loucks before the Sheridan intersection on the west side. This would create a four-way intersection at Sheridan instead of a six-way, and a pocket park could even be put in on the southeast corner, which would be usable by pedestrians.

Suffice it to say, there was a compelling case made that night for no roundabout. But now, suddenly, a roundabout is a serious contender for this intersection. It would be interesting to discover how decisions are being made, but the district councilperson is keeping attendance at these meetings under tight control.

For more information on roundabouts in the United States, see the excellent resources at the Transportation Research Board’s site. Hat tip to Beth Akeson on providing the TRB info.