All posts by C. J. Summers

I am a fourth-generation Peorian, married with three children.

HOPC meeting to be continued Friday

The Heart of Peoria Commission last Friday started working on our proposed work plan for 2007-2008. We will be finishing our work plan at another special meeting this Friday at 8 a.m., in the conference room in the Planning & Growth department. The meeting is open to the public, as always.

So far, the commission has expressed interest in focusing on implementing New Urbanism principles in transportation and the public space, continuing to assist with the implementation of the Land Development Code and the four Form Districts, and developing marketing materials for the Heart of Peoria Plan area to generate interest in reinvestment. These are subject to change and/or further refinement at this Friday’s meeting.

When the work plan is completed, it will be submitted to the City Council for consideration during their July 24 meeting. They’ll decide at that time whether to keep and fund the commission, or decommission us.

Special assessment projects update

Since writing my post about how slowly a particular special assessment project took to be completed, City Manager Randy Oliver wrote me to explain how the special assessment process works:

Special Assessments are funded as money becomes available. Unfortunately during the 2001-2003 budget crunch little of no funds were budgeted by Special Assessment. Projects are funded on a first-in first-out basis. This is the reason for the delay on West Melbourne.

I wrote back to ask a couple of follow-up questions and received this response:

City Council Budgeted $1.1M in 2005, $1.2M in 2006 and $1.2M in 2007. At the end of 2007 unfunded Special Assessments will be $1.725. This represents 3 projects (W. Wagner Lane Sidewalk, N. Easton Pace curb and W. Ridge Road curb and ornamental street lights). The projects are from 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. If funding would have remained at the 2005,2006 and 2007 levels in 2000, 2001 and 2002 things would have been fine. Unfortunately that was not the case. Please note that the City also did not buy many if any replacement vehicles or equipment in those lean years. The Fleet is almost back to the proper level.

So there you go. There had been no money budgeted by the city council for special assessments, which is why the project got delayed. Still funded by the council during the lean years: parking deck subsidies and the Gateway building. Priorities, you know.

Latest STB ruling confusing to some

Elaine Hopkins is all excited about the latest Surface Transportation Board ruling. The ruling was against Pioneer Railcorp and in favor of Central Illinois Railroad Company. Any defeat of Pioneer must be a ruling in favor of the trail in the minds of trail enthusiasts. As usual, the facts tell a different story.

Hopkins said: “The U.S. Surface Transportation has slapped down the most recent effort by Pioneer Railcorp to get back its operations on the Kellar Branch rail line.” Actually, this proceeding has nothing to do with the Kellar Branch line, but rather the western connection. Perhaps one could make the case that it’s related tangentially, but if Pioneer had won this proceeding, it would have done nothing to help them reestablish service on the Kellar.

Hopkins further said: “Central [Illinois Railroad Company] does not have a contract with the city to operate on the Western Connection line, but began operations as a successor company to a previous operator.” This is totally inaccurate, but it’s easy to get confused. The so-called “western connection” is actually a spur that used to be owned by the Union Pacific railroad that services growth cell two. It used to just dead end short of Pioneer Park, but the city built an 1800-foot extension (“connecting track”) so it could hook up with the Kellar Branch. So there are three pieces of track in play here: (1) the western spur, (2) the Kellar Branch, and (3) the 1800-foot connecting track. CIRY does indeed have a contract with the city to operate on the spur and the connecting track, but it only has STB authorization to operate on the spur. A contract with the city is not enough; any and all transactions must be approved by the STB. CIRY never requested authorization to operate over the connecting track; hence, they need to get authorization or cease operating. Although Carver Lumber is not currently getting any rail shipments from the west because it’s too expensive, CIRY has occasionally used the trackage to tow rail cars into storage in the Pioneer Park area.

The argument before the STB was rather complicated, but I’ll try to simplify it. CIRY was owned by DOT Rail Services, but now they’re owned by Central Illinois Railroad Holdings, LLC. The city’s contract for operating the western connection was made with DOT Rail Services, not CIRY directly. Thus, now that CIRY is owned by someone else, Pioneer challenged their authority to provide service on the western connection. The STB rejected that argument based on the legal language of the documents in question. The only argument of Pioneer’s with which they agreed was that CIRY had no authority to operate the 1800-foot connecting track.

Bottom line, this is a defeat for Pioneer, but it really has nothing to do with turning the Kellar into a walking trail. There is currently no proceeding before the STB requesting discontinuation of service on the Kellar Branch. That can only be requested by CIRY, the RTA’s preferred operator, and they haven’t done so. So the decision is not “a boost for turning the Kellar line into a trail.” In fact, Pioneer can lose all the proceedings currently before the STB and it won’t make any difference; the trail is going nowhere.

Of course, the trail could be built immediately if the Park District would simply map out an alternative route that doesn’t require removing the rail line. But it appears the goal isn’t really to build a trail any more, but to remove the rail line at any cost.

Peoria city ranking down, MSA ranking same

Peoria LogoThe U.S. Census Bureau released its 2006 population estimates this month, and the big news (via the Journal Star) is that Peoria has dropped from fifth- to seventh-largest city in Illinois:

The top 10 cities in the state ranked by population are: Chicago, Aurora, Rockford, Naperville, Joliet, Springfield, Peoria, Elgin, Waukegan and Cicero.

True. But the Bureau also released the figures on Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) for Illinois, and the Peoria MSA is still second-largest in the state. Peoria’s MSA includes five counties: Peoria, Tazewell, Woodford, Marshall, and Stark.

The nine MSAs in the state ranked by population haven’t changed order since 2000. They remain: Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, Peoria, Rockford, Champaign-Urbana, Springfield, Bloomington-Normal, Decatur, Kankakee-Bradley, and Danville. It should be noted, however, that Rockford is creeping up on us. In 2000, Peoria’s MSA had 46,695 more people than Rockford; the 2006 estimate shows a spread of only 21,942.

On a more interesting note, the City of Peoria’s population grew by only 171 people from 2000 to 2006, whereas Peoria’s MSA grew by 3,295. So, we’re not attracting many people to live in the city of Peoria when they move into the area. There’s some discussion going on over at Billy’s place on the reasons for that. In my opinion, the top two reasons are District 150 and taxes.

Nancy Drew

Nancy Drew Poster thumbnailLast Friday was my oldest daughter’s birthday, and on Saturday I took her to see the Nancy Drew movie. First, we went to Nova Cinemas (formerly Landmark Theaters) just before noon to catch the 12:05 showing. Nova has a deal where it’s only $4 per person to get in, and they have a “popcorn and pop” special for only $2. That makes things more affordable than any other theater in town. Plus, they’re close to home.

However, when I got up to the counter and asked for two tickets to see “Nancy Drew,” the teenaged worker informed me that they had cancelled all their “Nancy Drew” showings because the projector was broken. I’ve gone to a lot of movies in my lifetime, and I have to say that I’ve never, ever been turned away from a movie — especially in a multi-screen cineplex — because “the projector broke.” After staring at her a few seconds in disbelief, my daughter and I left and went to Rave Motion Picture Theaters out by the Shoppes at Grand Prairie. Of course, we were too late for the noon movie by that point, so we got tickets to the 2:25 showing.

When we finally got to see the movie, we both enjoyed it. The critics complain that it’s contrived and predictable, but those critics aren’t seven-year-old girls. My daughter had no idea what was going to happen next. Those critics also apparently never read a Nancy Drew book; they weren’t exactly groundbreaking works of realism. It was a clean, funny, and thoroughly family-friendly movie. It was refreshingly free of cynicism, with the character of Nancy Drew maintaining her integrity and sincerity. The sight gags and physical humor were well-executed, and the pacing was perfect.

If you decide to see it (or any other movie) at Nova, be sure to call first to find out if their projectors are working.

Time to shame Peoria’s most notorious slum lords

Remember when the City of Peoria tried shaming slumlords by putting a sign in front of their rundown properties with the name and number of the owner? Maybe the city should put one of those signs in front of these properties:

Meyer Building small

Harrison Homes

Know who owns these properties? The top one is the old Meyer building in the Warehouse District, and it’s owned by the illustrious District 150, which is terribly concerned about losing tax revenue from the Warehouse TIF. Of course, their neglected property isn’t contributing to lower property values down there, right? Margaret Hanley, who owns A. Lucas and Sons right next door, called District 150 out on the condition of their property at a recent council meeting, and rightly so. I wish I could say this was an isolated case, but alas, it isn’t. The district has lots of neglected properties (not to mention their school buildings). They recently demolished one property on Prospect and plan to demolish two more. And they own about 10% of the property in the Warehouse TIF District, which was passed by the council tonight. So put up the sign in front of the Meyer building and others with District 150’s name and number; label it “slumlord.”

The bottom building shows a very small sample of the boarded up windows adorning Harrison Homes, owned by the Peoria Housing Authority. If you’ve ever been by this low-income housing complex, you will notice that just about every building has at least two windows boarded up, often many more. And if you saw the map I posted earlier, you may have noticed that a number of homicides and lots of aggravated discharges of a firearm take place within Harrison Homes. We’re not paying taxes for these people to run a ghetto. They’re supposed to be providing decent transitional housing for people. Allowing their properties to fall into this state of disrepair is egregious. Council members Gary Sandberg and Barbara Van Auken called PHA out on the state of their properties at tonight’s council meeting, and rightly so. Put up the sign in front of Harrison Homes with the PHA’s name and number; label it “slumlord.”

It’s time for these public bodies to step up to the plate and take responsibility for their role in lowering property values and providing havens for crime. If they don’t, then the city should go after them just like they would any other slumlord. If these public bodies moan and complain, the city can explain that they’re just cracking down on crime and trying to raise property values, for the betterment of all Peorians.

The wheels of government turn slowly

SnailOn the council’s agenda tonight is a request by the residents on West Melbourne Avenue for some ornamental lighting. What’s interesting to me is that this request was approved by the Board of Local Improvements on June 19, 2003. That’s a full four years ago. Why does it take four years for something like this to be implemented?

Delays like this cost money. Materials get more expensive, and labor gets more expensive. It’s more expensive for the city, which affects all taxpayers, and it’s more expensive for the residents of Melbourne Avenue who agreed to pay 50% of the cost of this improvement through a special tax assessment on their properties. Actually, only 52.98% of the property owners agreed to it (it takes a simple majority for approval), so for those who didn’t want the ornamental lighting, the increased costs add insult to injury.

If the city is looking for their next big Six Sigma project to make the city more efficient, they needn’t look any further than this process.

Mapping Peoria crime

Someone recently asked to see Peoria’s homicides plotted on a map. I had mentioned that would take some time; well, as it turns out, the police already have such a map, and it was included in the agenda for tonight’s council meeting. It shows not only homicides, but also “aggravated discharge of a firearm” violations. I don’t think this will surprise anyone:

Homicide Map

On tonight’s agenda is a proposal to help stem the violence — the Cease Fire program, which was suggested by fourth-district councilman Bill Spears. Kudos to Mr. Spears for looking for new ideas on how to solve our crime problem.

HOPC to meet June 29

The Heart of Peoria Commission will meet this Friday, June 29, in the Twin Towers Suite 402 (front meeting room) to discuss this agenda:

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MAY 25,2007 – attached

3. CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON STATUS OF HEART OF PEORIA COMMISSION – deferred until July 24,2007, see Attachment A, relevant minutes from City Council meeting

4. PREPARATION AND APPROVAL OF WORK PLAN TO SUBMIT TO CITY COUNCIL FOR JULY 24, 2007 CONSIDERATION – see Attachment B memo, which also includes attachments

5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS

6. NEW BUSINESS

7. COMMENTS: Public (5 minutes per person)

8. FUTURE MEETING(S)

9. ADJOURNMENT

The meeting will be from 8 to 10:30 a.m. Note the change in location; we usually meet in City Hall, but this time the meeting will be held in the Planning & Growth offices on the fourth floor of the Twin Towers.