Category Archives: Radio

Media panel enlightening

I was part of a panel hosted by the League of Women Voters this morning. The topic was “the role of the media in a democracy.” Since I was a participant, I didn’t take notes or anything, but Elaine Hopkins did, and her report is here.

One of the most interesting discussions to me came about when one of the audience members asked why TV and radio news broadcasts do not air editorials. I’ve long wondered the same thing. At the Journal Star, of course, they have an editorial page, and the writers give the viewpoint of the paper itself. But television and radio news broadcasters don’t do that. Why not? Wouldn’t it be helpful to know the position of the news editors at all the media outlets?

The answer each of the participants gave was pretty much the same: editorials hurt ratings and lower the credibility of the newscasts. If they posit their opinion on the news of the day, they at worst alienate some viewers/listeners, and at best make their viewers/listeners suspicious of their news coverage. As a follow-up, I asked if they thought that was the case at the Journal Star — did the fact that they give an editorial viewpoint hurt their credibility, in the TV and radio panelists’ view. Answer: yes.

Jonathan Ahl from WCBU-FM stated that it also limits their ability to do their jobs. He told of how he had sat next to four successive Journal Star reporters at City Hall over the years and had witnessed all of them get shunned by mayors and council members — not because of their reporting, but because of the newspaper’s editorial positions. In the end, he said, it’s the reader who gets short-changed. He said he wasn’t willing to limit his ability to get a story by including editorials on the station. He would rather present the information as fair and balanced as possible and let the listeners form their own opinions.

Jody Davis, news director of WMBD-TV, gave examples of how ratings dipped on Sinclair Broadcasting-owned channels when they used to carry right-wing editorial comments from Sinclair officials. Even the bosses at Sinclair recognized the trend and quietly discontinued the editorials. Thus, broadcasters see a lot of potential for editorials to hurt ratings, and little if any value in them.

The morning ended on a somewhat depressing note for me, as I hung around after the meeting and heard about how low morale is at the Journal Star now that Gatehouse has taken over. Many seasoned reporters have left, benefits have been cut, and staff positions are going unfilled. Basically, the newsroom is being slashed through attrition. Jenni Davis moved from the City Hall beat to Lifestyles editor, and they’re not hiring anyone to fill her position. Instead, they’re going to replace her with one of the business reporters. Now there will be two instead of three business reporters; one more position eliminated.

Gatehouse is cutting costs on little things, too. They won’t buy antibacterial liquid soap for the bathrooms anymore, nor will they buy Post-It Notes. That kind of nitpicking at the budget is the sign of a company in serious financial trouble. They’ve overextended themselves by buying so many newspapers, and now they’re trying to cover the cost of their debt any way they can, from cutting staff to business supplies. There is no joy at the paper right now. And that’s sad.

Peoria Chronicle represented on League of Women Voters panel

From a news release:

League of Women Voters logoThe League of Women Voters of Greater Peoria will sponsor a public forum — “The Role of Media in a Democracy” Saturday, September 15th, beginning at 9:30 AM at the Radisson Hotel (formerly Jumers), 117 N Western Avenue, Peoria.

The discussion panel will include eight participants from the local Peoria media:

DeWayne Bartels, Reporter, Times-Observer newspapers
Terry Bibo, Reporter/Columnist, Peoria Journal Star
Laura Michels, Reporter, WHOI, Channel 19
Jody Davis, News Director, WMBD, Channel 31
Tom McIntyre, News Anchor, WEEK, Channel 25
Jonathan Ahl, News Director, WCBU Public Radio
Dan DiOrio, WMBD 1470 Talk Radio
C. J. Summers, peoriachronicle.com

The panel will discuss the challenges, methods and goals of the media, each from their own perspective; and will take questions from the audience.

“The Media in a Democracy” formum will also feature a “meet and reet” optional buffet breakfast ($11.00, tax and gratuity included) from 8:30 to 9:30AM. The forum will begin at 9:30 and is scheduled to conclude at 11:00AM.

The forum will offer a unique and rare opportunity to meet, hear, and ask questions of our local news gatherers and reporters — the who, what, where, when, and why of what they do, the combined information they provide, and the role they have in our democracy.

The “meet and greet” buffet breakfast and the “Media in Democracy” forum are open to the public and all are welcome to attend.

Say bye-bye to internet radio

Broken RecordUpdate: Seth Ben-Ezra has alerted me to some good news on this front from the Radio and Internet Newsletter. Thanks, Seth!

The Copyright Royalty Board decided in March of this year to triple royalty fees for internet radio stations, and the D. C. Court of Appeals today has denied the appeal of opponents of the new fee. Opponents are now urging people to call their congressmen and urge support of the Internet Radio Equality Act. But there’s no way that’s going to happen before these fees (which, incidentally, are retroactive to January 2006) take effect on Sunday, July 15.

Locally, that means WGLT, the jazz/blues NPR station out of Bloomington will likely stop webcasting next week. I haven’t heard what other stations may turn off their audio streaming once the new rates take effect, but the number and variety of internet radio channels will likely diminish precipitously.

It’s evidently the recording industry’s goal to alienate as many music lovers as possible. They’re succeeding.

Peoria Chronicle is on the air

Vintage MicCouncilman Bob Manning and I are Jonathan Ahl’s guests on Outside the Horseshoe tonight on WCBU (89.9 FM). I won’t actually be wearing my “blogger” hat for this interview, but rather my “Heart of Peoria Commission” hat, since that will be the main topic of discussion. Depending on how the council votes tonight, this may be my last day as a Heart of Peoria commissioner.

The Journal Star editorial board today came out in favor of keeping the Heart of Peoria Commission. My thanks to them for their support.

Dahl’s move reported in March issue of “Tune IN”

Dave Dahl’s move from WMBD radio to the Illinois Radio Network in Springfield was reported in the March issue of “Tune IN,” the newsletter of the Illinois News Broadcasters Association (INBA):

Oh My! Mr. Dahl Goes to Springfield
By Will Stevenson, WKEI-AM/Kewanee

The self-proclaimed “most hated man in Peoria media” is moving on. Dave Dahl, midday news anchor and former News Director of WMBD Radio in Peoria, has been named Springfield Bureau reporter for the Illinois Radio Network. Dahl will be replacing Ryan Hermes, who moved to Chicago to become morning reporter for WBBM-AM in Chicago.

“I’m excited about being part of the Statehouse scene and getting to know the cast of characters there, as well as being part of a highly respected network on Illinois’ best radio news stations,” Dahl said. “I am very sad to be leaving Peoria after eleven years, but am ecstatic to still be in radio news – and in INBA!”

Now if we can just get a radio station in Peoria to affiliate with the Illinois Radio Network, we can continue to hear Dahl. Right now the nearest affiliates are WBYS-AM 1560 (Canton), WJBC-AM 1230 (Bloomington), and WGIL-AM 1400 (Galesburg).

I send the money, WCBU thanks my wife

I decided to give some money to WCBU this year for their pledge drive. I gave it over their website — put in my name, address, phone number, credit card information, etc.

Today, my wife got a thank-you letter from WCBU. My wife is an alum of Bradley University (and yes, she can prove it in a moment’s notice) and of course WCBU is part of Bradley University, so it appears that Bradley’s computer matched up the address of my gift with her address in the alumni database and — voila! — a thank-you note was sent out to the wrong person.

Does it make a difference, since we are married, after all? Actually, yes. My wife thinks that NPR is liberal and would never have considered giving WCBU any money in her life. They really should be thanking me for the gift. That is, if they ever want me to send them any money ever again.*

*Disclaimer: This is an empty threat. My friend Jonathan Ahl personally thanked me already. The letter was computer-generated and signed by Thomas Hunt, Executive Director. Nevertheless, I think it’s poor form for a business to send a thank-you note to the wrong individual.

Pledge now… you filthy freeloader!

Money BagsWCBU is in their pledge drive this week (you can pledge on-line). Generally speaking, I hate pledge drives. Still, even with all the interruptions, I still think there is less time spent asking for money during a pledge drive than commercial stations spend in ad time every day, so I’m not complaining.

I do have one complaint about the method used to raise money, and that is when they stop simply asking for money and start acting like you’re obligated to give; that you somehow owe them money because they’ve chosen to provide their content for free over the airwaves. To me, this makes them sound like a “squeegee guy” — the guy who approaches cars stopped in traffic and cleans their windows without asking, then demands payment.

I guess I’m not sure what the guilt-trip tactic accomplishes. One could just as easily assuage one’s guilt by not listening to their station anymore, and what good would that do? Their costs of delivery stay the same whether people listen or not. You can draw more flies with honey than vinegar, so why not stay positive?

Nevertheless, I think it’s a good cause because they do provide good content. I’m not a big classical music fan, but I do appreciate their stellar local news coverage. So, I’m pledging this year.

And besides, this gives me an idea: Maybe I’ll conduct my own pledge drive here and try to raise some money to cover my time and expenses. Hey, I think I may be onto something…. No ads, just annual pledge drives and underwriters…. Hmmm, this could work for the Chronicle…. Thanks, WCBU!

The Peoria Chronicle is on the air

Vintage MicI’ll be on WCBU tonight with Jonathan Ahl, first as a guest on “Outside the Horseshoe” at 6 p.m., and then in the studio to comment on the election results as updates are provided.

Because of the cumulative voting system and low voter turnout, there’s no telling how things will shake out tonight. Who will be eliminated? Who will be the top vote-getters? If the turnout is indeed low, as expected, can these returns be considered a valid sample of all registered voters and their feelings about the candidates? Tune in tonight for answers to some questions and speculation about others on WCBU, 89.9 FM.

Problem in Dunlap flap is with Journal Star, not library

The Journal Star has been reporting lately on some controversy surrounding a referendum for the Dunlap library to issue bonds to build a larger library. Today’s paper has this summary:

Since the November election, controversy has surfaced over the referendum. Unofficial results first showed it had passed, but a later tally showed it had failed by 42 votes. However, absentee ballots counted in the two weeks following election day confirmed it actually had passed, with 1,185 people voting in favor of issuing bonds and 1,176 voting against them.

Despite that turnaround, no one in the media was told or reported the final results, leaving some residents to believe they were kept in the dark and, therefore, missed a deadline to seek a “petition for discovery” – essentially, a possible re-count.

However, Jonathan Ahl, news director of WCBU 89.9 FM in Peoria, says that description of the situation doesn’t jibe with his experience:

WCBU obtained the vote total of the referendum from then County Clerk JoAnn Thomas on November 8th, the day after the election. We reported at the time the yes votes outnumbered the no votes by six. Thomas said in an interview that all votes had been counted except for the provisional ballots and absentee ballots that were postmarked by November 5 that had not yet arrived in the mail. The early votes HAD been counted at that time.

We reported again on November 15th that unless there was a challenge, the referendum would pass with the yes position winning by nine votes. In addition to Ms. Thomas willingness to answer our questions on the results, all of this information was available on the Peoria County Clerk’s web site.

With that in mind, it is baffling to me to read sentences in Journal Star reports claiming the numbers were never released to the media, and that the apparent win by the yes votes was not discovered until “a few weeks later.”

Most disturbing is the Journal Star’s sweeping statement that “no one in the media was told or reported the final results.” I guess it depends on what they mean by “final.” If they mean that only certified totals are “final,” then no, probably no one in the media reported on them at that point.

But there’s a reason for that. The “unofficial” tally, which was posted on the county’s website on 11/15/06 and reported on WCBU is identical to the tally that was certified and posted on 11/28/06:

QUESTION TO ISSUE $2,500,000 LIBRARY BONDS, Vote For 1

Early/Absentee Election Total
YES 148 (66.67%) 1,037 (48.48%) 1,185 (50.19%)
NO 74 (33.33%) 1,102 (51.52%) 1,176 (49.81%)

So, why would anyone need to re-report something when the tallies didn’t change? It sounds to me like WCBU reported on the vote totals on the county website, but the Journal Star was evidently sitting around waiting for someone to call up and tell them about it. I thought reporters were supposed to go out and get information, not sit around waiting for news to come to them.

Are they now trying to cover their failure by claiming “no one in the media was told” and blaming the whole thing on the library board?