My little brainstorm for the City/Firefly partnership

Electric Bus graphicOn Tuesday night, the city is probably going to approve a loan guarantee, in partnership with Peoria County, for Firefly Energy. This will allow Firefly to establish their headquarters here in Peoria and employ 65 people locally. Assuming they’re successful, which seems pretty likely, it won’t cost the city or county a thing. In fact, the city and county will receive $480,000 of common stock.

So here’s the little brainstorm I had*, for what it’s worth: I believe Firefly should have a place to showcase their battery technology. How about if they showcase it in CityLink buses?

Imagine if CityLink buses ran on Firefly batteries. With gasoline prices skyrocketing, I’ll bet the cost savings in fuel would be enough that CityLink could afford to run the buses more frequently and increase ridership as a result. It would also get Peoria a lot of press — even nationally — especially if they weren’t typical hybrid buses but 100% battery-powered.

Maybe it’s a pipe dream, but why not at least explore the idea? I figure, as gas prices climb, there’s going to be increased demand for convenient and affordable public transportation. That’s going to require the buses to come more frequently than once every half-hour during peak times or hour during non-peak times. In order to make it economical to provide that additional service, either fares are going to have to go up or costs are going to have to be cut somehow. It seems reasonable that Firefly battery technology — especially if it were donated as a marketing strategy — could provide enough cost savings to make improved frequency possible. I’ll bet there’s even a federal grant or two out there that could help defray the costs of a feasibility study and/or implementation.

Maybe someone can run the idea past Ray LaHood. If he shoots it down, we’ll know we have a winner.

*Hat tip: Sharon Deckard, who had the idea to run a Firefly battery-powered trolley on the Kellar Branch. That was the seed for my idea to put the batteries in buses.

Old Big Hollow Dump no more!

Kudos to Peoria County for quickly cleaning up all the garbage on an abandoned portion of Big Hollow Road and sealing off access to it! Here are a couple of pictures showing the cleaned road and the barricades blocking access:

Road Closed to Big Hollow dump

Big Hollow Road clean

Also, kudos to HOI News for drawing attention to this situation and following up with city and county officials. This was a win for everyone. Hopefully the filthy pigs who dumped their garbage there in the first place will stay away now.

What’s the next step for the Heart of Peoria Commission?

Billy Dennis is reporting that the city is planning to de-commission the Heart of Peoria Commission and redistribute the members to other city commissions, most notably the Planning Commission. This has all come up relatively quickly, so I’m not going to have many comments on it until the HOPC meets (May 25) and we have a chance to discuss it. I will say a couple of things, though.

First, the part about putting Heart of Peoria Commission (HOPC) members on other commissions should be no surprise, since that was the recommendation from the city’s Committee on Commissions (item C.4.). The specific appointments to these other commissions that Billy lists on his blog are only suggested at this point, as not all commissioners have been contacted to see if they are able or willing to serve on those commissions. I have been contacted and have expressed my willingness to serve on the Planning Commission. I think dual appointments are a good idea, and infusing New Urbanism principles into these existing commissions will make them and the city stronger.

As for the HOPC being decommissioned, that’s something that needs to be discussed. I knew this idea was out there as a possibility, but I didn’t expect to see it coupled with the dual appointments as it was in the communication that Billy posted on his blog. There are a number of pros and cons to decommissioning HOPC, and I don’t know that all the ramifications have been thoroughly explored.

The idea promoted in the draft council communication would be to change HOPC from a city-appointed commission “to a private, civic commission, similar to that of Peoria City Beautiful, allowing the current and future members to meet as they wish, without Open Meeting Act regulations, to study, advocate, and take other actions as they wish related to the Heart of Peoria Plan and New Urbanism.” Another idea I’ve heard that was not listed, however, would keep the HOPC as a city commission, but have it meet more infrequently (quarterly, perhaps) to advocate for and educate on New Urbanism principles, kind of like it’s doing now.

I’m sure there will be some (ahem) spirited discussions about these ideas over the next couple of weeks. I think the dual appointments definitely need to be done because all the commissions need to have new urbanism principles represented. Whether the HOPC is decommissioned is still an open question for me. I look forward to hearing more discussion/debate on that idea.

Electric rates not nearly high enough yet for greedy Ameren

Ameren LogoDespite the fact that Ameren’s webpage boasts “To Our Illinois Customers: We have listened to you and are ready to provide immediate rate relief,” the Journal Star reports today that rates are going up still more during June, July, August and September:

“No one likes to pay more for any product or service, but the rising costs of electricity have made higher rates a necessity,” Stan Ogden, Ameren Illinois’ director of customer service, said in a news release. “We have been able to structure rates to minimize the impact of higher costs during the summer months.”

I guess that 76% jump in profits just wasn’t enough to sustain old Ameren over the summer months. Their costs are going up, and it’s going to eat into that $123 million profit they made during the first three months of the year. I just don’t know how they’ll manage to stay in business at that rate.

To prevent paying higher electric bills, make sure that your home does not have cracks and gaps where so the ac does not have to over work, you can use spray foam to properly insulate your home.

Fortunately, they’ve worked to “minimize the impact of higher costs.” How thoughtful. Mr. Ogden and his bosses can console themselves with that thought every time an elderly person on a fixed income dies this summer because they can’t afford to run their air conditioners.

Do the greedy monopolists at Ameren really think they’re fooling anybody? Luckily, homeowners can switch to Regional Energy for lower electricity rates Calgary.

Update: First, it has come to my attention that my understanding of the rate increase is not accurate. The way I read the newspaper article, it sounded like they were talking about an additional rate increase for the summer months on top of the increase that took effect January 1. Not true. In fact, the increase is rather in reference to how much higher the summer rates will be relative to last year.

Secondly, for the record, I just want to express that I don’t really think Ameren is trying to kill old people — that was hyperbole. I felt that was obvious, but I’ve been told that Ameren employees take comments like that personally. So, if any Ameren employees thought I was accusing them of negligent homicide, my apologies. I guess some people take my blog way more seriously than I thought. I suppose that’s a good thing. It could mean that people are reading the Chronicle and have high expectations for it. I’ll go with that explanation. 🙂

Morning briefing

I’m too busy to do a lot of blogging today, but here are a few comments on the news of the day:

  • West Main Street needs to be narrowed from five lanes to three, the on-street parking restored, and sidewalks widened. That’s the only way to slow traffic on the street. The 30 mph speed limit is a joke — the street is built for speed and people are going to go the speed the road is designed to accommodate. There’s a meeting planned to discuss this issue on Tuesday, May 29, at 6:00 somewhere at Bradley University (exact location TBD).
  • I see the Journal Star caught up with WCBU today by reporting how Ray LaHood has been throwing cold water on the Peoria Amtrak plan. LaHood’s comments are devoid of logic. He thinks no one will take a train to Chicago from Peoria unless it can get there quicker than driving, but on the other hand he thinks people will take a bus to Normal or Galesburg and take a train to Chicago from one of those stations. Who’s whispering in LaHood’s ear to try to sabotage this effort? Auto makers? Oil companies?
  • Now that’s what I call a “happy meal.”
  • Whenever I try to go to WMBD radio’s website, it crashes my Firefox browser. However, it works in Internet Explorer. It’s really annoying.

Feel free to discuss anything else you want. This is an open thread.

If you really want a trail, give up efforts to remove rail line

Kellar Branch RailroadJust a reminder to trail advocates: there is currently no petition pending before the Surface Transportation Board (STB) that would discontinue service on the Kellar Branch. Central Illinois Railroad withdrew that petition months ago and have never refiled. The only petition before the STB at this time is what’s called an “adverse discontinuance,” and the decision that’s handed down will determine whether Pioneer Industrial Railway or Central Illinois Railroad (CIRY) is allowed to operate the line.

So, even if the ruling comes down in favor of CIRY, the city still can’t tear up the tracks and turn it into a trail. Furthermore, the City has been trying for several months to (according to the 2/20/07 council minutes) “negotiate with Central Illinois Railway for a modified certificate, which would allow Central Illinois Railway to operate on the Keller Branch for a limited period of time,” but has been unsuccessful so far. That doesn’t bode well for future cooperation on abandonment.

I hate to say I told you so, but, this really shouldn’t have come as any surprise. CIRY has never been a responsible corporate citizen, and there was no reason to believe they would be in the future. Nevertheless, that was the risk the council and trail advocates chose to take.

I would encourage everyone, whether pro-rail or pro-trail, to tell the City and the Park District to go to “Plan B” and stop wasting tax money fighting this thing. They can find an alternative route for building the trail, just like they did south of War Memorial (Class III trail), just like they did at Pioneer Park and Sommer (asphalt sidewalks), and just like they did north of Pioneer Parkway (trail next to the rail line). What is the end goal: to eliminate the Kellar Branch or to build a trail? I think the parties here are losing focus.

Old Big Hollow Dump, Part 2

HOI News has followed up on the dumping that’s occurred on an abandoned portion of Big Hollow Road. It turns out that the abandoned slab is not a city road, but a county road. This, despite the fact that it’s located within the city. How confusing. Nevertheless, my apologies to the City for any disparaging remarks I may have made about the city’s code enforcement or litter-clean-up efforts on this stretch.

The county sounds a little reluctant to clean up the mess:

“We ask that the people maintain don’t throw their garbage on there. We do at times take some of the larger things out as a rule- we don’t- we’re so busy with maintaining the roadways we don’t really have the time or people to invest in proper clean up,” said Peoria County engineer Tom McFarland.

They also stated that they were considering sealing off the road. I think that would be a good idea. There’s no reason to give easy access to a highly-secluded, abandoned roadway. It just invites illegal dumping and possibly other undesirable activity.

I think someone mentioned this in the comments section of my last post on this topic, and I couldn’t agree more: the real villains in this case are the filthy pigs who dumped this garbage back there in the first place. I wish they could be caught and fined, or — even better — be given back their garbage, preferably on their living room floor.

New era begins in Heart of Peoria

On June 15, four areas of Peoria will be the first to benefit from a new kind of zoning (some might even call it an alternative to zoning): form-based codes. The City Council last night unanimously adopted ordinances that put the new coding into place for the four form districts which are the West Main corridor, Warehouse District, Sheridan/Loucks Triangle, and Prospect Road corridor.

Form-based codes differ from our current zoning (aka “Euclidean zoning) in some significant ways. Whereas Euclidean zoning is primarily concerned about land use and only marginally concerned about design or form, form-based codes are just the opposite. Form-based codes stress limits for height, siting, and building elements, and have only a few limits on uses.

If you want to build a new building along Main street, right now you have to follow the same zoning regulations as if you were building out in a cornfield on the north side of town — setbacks from the street, surface parking requirements, etc. Just take a look at Jimmy John’s on West Main and you’ll get the idea. That’s what infill looks like under suburban zoning code.

Under the form-based codes, infill development will instead be consistent with the current built environment. For instance, on West Main street, any new buildings will have to be built up to the sidewalk and utilize nearby shared parking with other businesses or provide private parking in the rear of the building. Whereas Euclidean zoning separates land uses into residential, commercial, office, etc., form-based codes allow these uses to be mixed, thus making it possible for someone to build an apartment over their store, or to have office space above a retail business.

The council also voted to bring off the table the rest of the Land Development Code (which would apply to the Heart of Peoria Plan area outside of the four form districts) with the Heart of Peoria Commission’s recommendation for the Knoxville corridor, and a recommendation that there be a four-month transitional period following its enactment. This could come before the council as early as next month for adoption.

The transitional period would be a four-month time frame during which projects could still be approved under the old zoning ordinance if the developer can prove that he was relying on those ordinances when making plans, acquiring property, etc. That’s a reasonable request. The council often makes zoning and especially fee changes without any kind of consideration for what that would do to pending projects, so this is really a step forward.

District 150’s estimates wildly divergent

Peoria Public Schools logoOne has to wonder how District 150 is estimating the cost to build a new school.

Clare Jellick reported Tuesday on the school board’s plan to build a new school to replace Harrison. Their original plans were too big and too expensive, so now they’ve reduced the square footage and the estimated costs:

Construction costs came in over budget last year when the original design, at 120,000 square feet, was estimated to cost as much as $21.6 million. The building was first estimated to cost $15 million.

The proposed space would be about 18,000 square feet smaller than the original design and cost about $19.7 million.

There are three estimates in those two paragraphs, plus there’s one more estimate that wasn’t listed. That estimate is the one that STS Consultants made that justified replacing the building instead of renovating it in the first place.

STS Consultants was hired to conduct the district’s 10-year “Health Life Safety” report on several schools including Harrison and Glen Oak. This report has direct bearing on how much money the school can obtain through Health Life Safety bonds for maintenance or replacement of school buildings. STS told the Illinois State Board of Education in December 2006 — just five months ago — that the cost to replace the current 102,396-square-foot facility would be only $11,812,158, about $165,000 less than it would cost to renovate the building to bring it up to code.

Just so we can compare apples to apples, here’s how all these estimates break down in cost per square foot:

Estimate Total Cost Total ft.² Cost per ft.²
8/05 Estimate $15,000,000 120,000 SF $125.00/SF
8/06 Estimate $21,600,000 120,000 SF $180.00/SF
12/06 Estimate (STS) $11,812,158 102,396 SF $115.36/SF
5/07 Estimate $19,700,000 102,000 SF $193.14/SF

Anyone remember that song from Sesame Street that goes, “One of these things is not like the other”? That STS Consultants estimate really sticks out, doesn’t it? Yet that was the estimate that was used to “prove” that it would cost less to replace the school building than to renovate it.

STS Consultants used the RS Means Building Construction Cost Data (2006 Edition) to do their estimate. RS Means provides a complicated formula that takes into account the fact that square footage costs vary depending on the size of the structure and the city in which it’s built. However, it’s pretty clear to me that RS Means’ estimates are considerably lower than reality. Notice the dates in the above table — even up to a year and a half before STS’s estimate was done, the district was figuring it would cost more than $115 per square foot to build a new school.

The district didn’t question STS Consultants’ estimate even though it was obviously too low and unrealistic. Why? Could it be because the school board and administration want to replace the buildings, and STS’s numbers provided the justification they wanted?

This calls into question something else: the cost to replace Glen Oak School. STS Consultants’ study on that school concluded the cost to renovate the building ($8.36 million) would be more than the cost to replace it ($7.95 million). But their cost of replacement was based on $119.08 per square foot for the 66,791-square-foot building. Now that we know the real cost is closer to $190+ per square foot, the decision to replace the building needs to be reconsidered.

Ray LaHood pooh-poohs Peoria Amtrak plan

Ray LaHoodThis morning as I listened to WCBU’s news broadcast, I was shocked to hear Ray LaHood say that Amtrak is never going to come to Peoria and we should be satisfied with bus service to Galesburg and/or Bloomington to connect with Amtrak there.

First of all, IDOT hasn’t even done a feasibility study on the proposed Amtrak route to Peoria yet. Why is LaHood prejudging the outcome of that study? There are a lot of people working on getting Amtrak back to Peoria because they believe it will be good for the economy, for college students, for tourism, and of course for transportation options for Peoria residents.

Secondly, this is the second time that LaHood has tried to sabotage local transportation plans. LaHood torpedoed attempts to build a Chicago-Peoria interstate highway, suggesting widening Route 29 instead. Now he’s trying to undermine the efforts of local officials to bring passenger train service back to Peoria.

LaHood has supported upgrading existing transportation facilities, such as I-74 and the airport terminal and runways, but he apparently doesn’t support adding more transportation options that could benefit Peoria. Why is LaHood holding Peoria back? Why does Ray think Peoria doesn’t deserve better?

Update: I talked to Jonathan Ahl tonight at the city council meeting and discovered that he had posted about this topic and I missed it. My apologies. You’ll want to read Jonathan’s take on it since he’s the one who interviewed LaHood.