Protest planned against school closings

Well over 100 people crowded into the banquet room at Godfather’s Pizza Thursday night in reaction to District 150’s proposal to balance the budget by closing and consolidating schools. Included in the crowd were teachers, students, coaches, staff members, parents, alumni, and other concerned citizens. The meeting started at 5 p.m. and lasted about an hour and a half. Terry Knapp was the moderator and several people spoke. Here’s a small sampling:

[flashvideo filename=https://peoriachronicle.com/wp-content/uploads/Video/WHS-Protest.flv /]

My thanks to Terry, Jeff Adkins-Dutro, and Hedy Elliot-Gardner for letting me publish their comments. Jeff and Hedy are running for union president and vice president, respectively.

In case you didn’t catch it, the plan is to hold a protest outside the District 150 offices on Wisconsin next Tuesday at 5:30 p.m., prior to the board meeting. School board meetings are normally on Mondays, but next Monday is the Martin Luther King, Jr., holiday. The goal is to have 300-400 people from demonstrating against closing Woodruff High and other schools slated for closure.

The concerns with closing schools are many:

  • Larger class sizes — When Manual was restructured, the district emphasized that it was important to establish/maintain “small learning communities.” Now they want to combine schools that will lead to large classes of 29+ students. To make matters worse, the district is also trying to take special education children out of their special classes and integrate them into regular classrooms. So now, in addition to having larger class sizes, teachers are going to have the added pressure of helping special ed kids keep up with the rest of the class.
  • Mixing rival gangs — I’m not up on Peoria’s gang situation, but several attendees who are aware of it expressed concern about putting a lot of kids from rival gangs in the same school building. It poses a number of security problems.
  • Combining of athletic teams — Kids who are able to make the cut for, say, basketball in their respective schools now will end up being cut from the team when players from both high schools are combined to make one team. For some of those kids, sports is what keeps them in school and keeps them connected; and being cut from the team will raise the likelihood of them dropping out.
  • Edison schools not on the chopping block — No one can understand why the district wouldn’t cut Edison schools’ contract before closing down schools. A lot of money could be saved by getting rid of that private, for-profit company’s contract.
  • Consultants/administrators not on the chopping block — At the same time the administration is talking about closing schools and cutting teachers, they are adding more administrative staff. Why wouldn’t they cut the fat in the administration before they start making cuts that impact students?

As I listened closely to the rally Thursday, I noticed that this was not just about schools closing. There are some deeper issues that are frustrating the teachers. Consider that the teachers and principals found out about the District’s proposal to close and consolidate schools from the press. The assistant principal of Woodruff first heard it on the 10:00 news Wednesday night. It’s bad enough that the administration doesn’t consult their teachers and staff for input on these matters; the least they can do is inform them of their plans before they tell the news media and general public.

There was also frustration that no union representatives were at the meeting Thursday. Many teachers were incensed that Peoria Federation of Teachers president Scott Schifeling wasn’t at the meeting Thursday night, nor was anyone from the union’s executive board. An attendee who had talked to several board members reported to the group that they weren’t attending the meeting because they “felt slighted that they weren’t invited.” Not exactly the way to inspire confidence among the teachers.

Expect a lot of protesters Tuesday night, and a lot of people lined up to speak to the school board during the public comment period of Tuesday’s meeting.

105 thoughts on “Protest planned against school closings”

  1. Today there have been many posts so one very important one by PrairieCelt has gotten buried down in the superintendent search subject. In case you missed it the revelation is a “must understand” for concerned parents and interested parties. Specifically PrairieCelt posted:

    “Kingman and Irving are Title I schools, are they not, and as such, most if not all of the teachers’ salaries are paid by Title I funds. Therefore, they are not charged against Ed Fund revenues. So how does closing Kingman, Irving, Tyng and Garfield address a structural imbalance in the Ed Fund? The federal Title I funds – to the best of my knowledge – haven’t been reduced or eliminated.

    Special ed salaries are also covered by special monies or at least via flow-through accounts. So they aren’t directly charged against the Ed Fund either.

    If the proposed school closings are for the purpose of relieving the financial burden on the Ed Fund, why not propose closing 2 schools whose salary expenses (at least for Regular Division classroom staff) are charged to the Ed Fund?

    The costs of operating a physical plant are small in comparsion to personnel cost, and some maintenance and/or repairs qualify for Health, Life Safety funding.

    So, what’s going on?”

    I posted a confirmation to that statement let alone stated this just shows once again how shallow this decision is let alone in error! Do you see now why Hinton can’t be trusted? And you must question what is his REAL motive to bus these children around Peoria and warehouse them like little widgets until he has retired!

  2. And why the rush all of a sudden to close a high school too? And why the rush even to close ANY school before there is a plan in place? The budget isn’t due until SEPTEMBER. And we have multiple FOIA’s outstanding, FOIA’s that will undoubtedly not be filled until after the “vote”. Something is rotten in Denmark.

  3. About Wacky Wednesday: I did a FOIA and received the information regarding what was done on these days. At one board meeting Karen Adkins-Dutro read some of the negative responses from teachers (info received in the FOIA). Ken told everyone at the meeting that those comments were made after only the first WW–not so, the dates were all from e-mails sent in January. I was going to write something about how those days were spent. It was a confusing mess–every school did something different. Teachers from some buildings indicated that much of what happened on WW was just a retread of what they had already heard in the past. To my knowledge, there was no coordination, no oversight, etc.
    Although the district did do some follow-up with questionnaires filled out by teachers, I never heard any evaluation reports to the board members (besides what Karen read)–they just voted to continue WWs without any substantial proof of their effectiveness.

  4. I would like to see what would happen if they tried to close Kellar, Northmoor, or Richwoods. Any guesses? Why do they pick on the poor schools?

  5. Anonymous,
    you know the obvious answer. I just hope that YOU and OTHERS reading this about Title 1 funding understands that closing those “poor schools” will NOT save much money at all! So why is Hinton so hellbent on doing it? What power structure in Peoria has caused him to throw away those children “who look like him”?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.