District 150 will decide tonight whether the new, enlarged Glen Oak School campus will extend north or south of the current campus. The Journal Star reports:
“We need to make a definite decision,” Gorenz said Monday. He wouldn’t elaborate which direction, whether to the north or south, he thought the new school might extend, saying that would be made known tonight.
The district so far has discussed three proposals for expanding the Glen Oak Primary School campus from its current three acres to as many as 12 acres.
So, just what do these possibilities look like? Here are a few options that the school board is considering — two options to expand to the north, and one option to expand to the south. Rumor has it that the southward expansion is favored (click on each picture for larger image):
They still insist on consuming more acreage than they need. These site plans would be appropriate for a suburban school. But for a neighborhood school in an urban area, this is not an appropriate use of land — especially the excessive parking areas. The staff parking lot is more than sufficient — why do they need “bus parking”? And why do they need another parking lot? Are the third-graders driving themselves to school now and need a place to leave their cars during the day? And why is the school building all spread out? Why not build up and take up a smaller footprint?
Is anyone on the school board asking these questions?
UPDATE: The school board did indeed decide on the southward plan. It was pointed out that these drawings (above) are conceptual. They’re not final site plans. The placement and configuration of the building, for instance, may be different than what is shown. It was stated that the public will have input — especially those who live in the Glen Oak School attendance area.
The cost of the project, including property acquisition, is estimated to be $27 million. And that’s the amount the school board will request from the Public Building Commission. School board member Jim Stowell suggested the City should help with property acquisition costs.
I wrote this post originally a bit in haste, as I wanted to get the pictures up as soon as possible. Thus, my comments sounded a bit overly negative. I should have stated that, on the positive side, I am pleased that the school board chose the current Glen Oak School site. It is by far the best location, and they should be applauded for listening to the wishes of the City, neighborhood associations, residents, teachers, et. al.
Nevertheless, I do still have the concerns I noted above. The excessive land requirements are unnecessary and needlessly inflate the price of the school project. Perhaps with some more public input, the school board will scale back the size as well.