Monthly Archives: February 2010

City of Peoria

Liveblogging the City Council (from home) 2/9/2010

Leave a comment

Hello everyone. I’m not going to venture out in the snow and try to find parking on a night that Bradley is playing ISU at the Civic Center. So, I’m going to snuggle up at home and listen to the council meeting on WCBU radio. As usual, I’ll be updating this post throughout the evening, so be sure to refresh often. Here’s the agenda:

PETITIONS, REMONSTRANCES & COMMUNICATIONS – CITY OF PEORIA UNFINISHED BUSINESS

(09-500) PUBLIC HEARING Regarding Proposed ANNEXATION of 9900 N. ALLEN ROAD (Temporary Address) (Continued from November 24, 2009).

Councilman Irving moves to open the public hearing, seconded by Van Auken.

  • Joyce Blumenshine: Has a few issues with the annexation — actually with the plan for the site. She asks that the annexation not be voted on tonight. Developer is trying to maximize density for the site to the detriment of the environment. It’s not consistent with the City’s ordinances, such as the stream buffer ordinance.
  • Kiersten Sheets: Lives in Marshall County, but is on the Sustainability Commission as well as a member of other environmental groups. She also is concerned about the site plan, not so much the annexation. She also takes issue with the storm-water management plan. Recommends a “low-impact development storm water ordinance.”

That’s it. No one else wishes to speak.

(09-501) Communication from the City Manager and Director of Planning and Growth Management with Recommendation from the Planning Commission to Adopt the Following:

A. RESOLUTION Approving the ANNEXATION AGREEMENT for Property Generally Located NORTHEAST of the ROCK ISLAND TRAIL (Parcel ID No. 09-31-251-004) EAST of ALLEN ROAD, SOUTH of BROMPTON COURT and Parcel ID No. 09-31-208-031, and WEST of Parcel ID No. 09-31-226-027; the Property Proposed for Annexation is Parcel ID No. 09-31-251-006, with a TEMPORARY ADDRESS of 9900 N. ALLEN ROAD, Located within One and One-Half Miles of the City of Peoria;

Councilman Irving makes several changes to the resolution in his motion, seconded by Turner. Councilman Sandberg is concerned about the proposed apartment complex. There is too much traffic in this area already, and this apartment complex adds 96 units which will make traffic even worse. He’s also concerned about the amount of dirt that they’re planning to move and the impact it will have on drainage. In the Comprehensive Plan, this is designated as a conservation area, and the developer wants to “shoehorn in” three significant buildings. Sandberg is okay with the proposed single family home on Brookshire. Motion passes 10-1; Sandberg voting no.

B. ORDINANCE ANNEXING TERRITORY Contiguous to the City of Peoria – 9900 N. ALLEN ROAD (Temporary Address).

Irving moves to approve, seconded by Turner; no discussion. Passes 10-1 (Sandberg).

(09-502) Communication from the City Manager and Director of Planning and Growth Management with Recommendation from the Zoning Commission and Staff to Adopt an ORDINANCE Rezoning Property Located in the 9900 BLOCK of ALLEN ROAD Upon Annexation from Class R3 (Single Family Residential) District to a Class R6 (Multi-Family Residential) District.

Irving moves to approve, seconded by Turner; no discussion. Motion passes 10-1 (Sandberg).

(09-503) Communication from the City Manager and Director of Planning and Growth Management with Recommendation from the Planning Commission and Staff to Adopt an ORDINANCE Approving the MULTI-FAMILY PLAN for Property Generally Located NORTHEAST of the ROCK ISLAND TRAIL (Parcel ID No. 09-31-251-004), EAST of ALLEN ROAD, SOUTH of BROMPTON COURT and Parcel ID No. 09-31-208-013, and WEST of Parcel ID No. 09-31-226-027, with the Property Identified as Parcel ID No. 09-31-251-006, with a TEMPORARY ADDRESS of 9900 N. ALLEN ROAD, with Conditions.

Irving moves to approve with some changes; seconded by Spain. Irving thanks the developer. Motion passes 10-1 (Sandberg).

ITEM NO. 1 CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS BY OMNIBUS VOTE, for the City of Peoria, with Recommendations as Outlined:

A. Communication from the City Manager and Police Chief Requesting Approval for the ANNUAL PURCHASE of FACTORY AMMUNITION for POLICE DUTY USE from KIESLER POLICE SUPPLY, INC., in the Amount of $28,992.32.

B. Communication from the City Manager and Police Chief Requesting Approval of a SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE of THREE POLICE CANINES, One with Specialty in Explosives Detection and Patrol Function and Two with Narcotics and Patrol Specialties from SOUTHERN POLICE CANINE, INC., in the Total Amount of $41,800.00, with Funds Coming from the Federal Asset Forfeiture Account.

C. Communication from the City Manager and Director of Public Works Requesting Approval to PURCHASE THREE (3) PICK-UP TRUCKS Through the State of Illinois Contract Bid Process for the PARK DISTRICT’S USE to Include TWO FORD F250 TWO-WHEEL DRIVE PICK-UP TRUCKS and ONE FORD F250 FOUR-WHEEL DRIVE PICK-UP from LANDMARK FORD in Springfield, Illinois, for ROUTINE REPLACEMENT, in the Amount of $63,000.00.

D. Communication from the City Manager and Director of Public Works Requesting Approval to PURCHASE TWO F550 SUPER DUTY TRUCKS, Fully Equipped with Dump Box, Snow Plow and Salt Spreaders from LANDMARK AUTOMOTIVE GROUP in Springfield, Illinois, in the Amount of $138,124.00, Utilizing the State Contract Bidding Process.

E. Communication from the City Manager and Director of Public Works Requesting Acceptance of the LOW BID of R. A. CULLINAN & SONS, INC. and Award the CONTRACT, in the Amount of $1,803,195.91, with Additional Authorization of $90,159.80 (5% for Contingencies) for the GLEN OAK SCHOOL IMPACT ZONE STREET IMPROVEMENTS for WISCONSIN, REPUBLIC, MARYLAND, and KANSAS STREETS.

F. Communication from the City Manager and Director of Public Works Requesting Acceptance of the LOW BID of ILLINOIS CIVIL CONTRACTORS, INC. and Award the CONTRACT, in the Amount of $1,373,739.95, with Extra Authorization of $68,687.00 (An Additional 5% for Contingencies) for the HOLLY HEDGES/DEVEREUX CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS. (Refer to Item Nos. 08-615 and 09-430)

G. Communication from the City Manager and Director of Planning and Growth Management Requesting Approval of an AMENDMENT to the HAND UP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 2009 CHDO PROJECT SCOPE to Develop ONE NEW, SINGLE FAMILY, OWNER-OCCUPIED HOME Located at 522 W. WILLCOX AVENUE (Parcel ID No. 14-33-152-020) and CANCEL DEVELOPMENT of ONE NEW, SINGLE FAMILY, OWNER-OCCUPIED HOME Located in the 3400 BLOCK of SYLVAN LANE (Parcel ID No. 13-24-453-012). (Amends Item No. 09-450)

H. Communication from the City Manager Requesting Approval to FORBEAR on a LOAN to GLOBE ENERGY for 90 DAYS and Requesting Authorization for the City Manager to Execute the Necessary Documents. (Refer to Item No. 07-268)

I. Communication from the City Manager and Director of Public Works Requesting Approval to Execute a TWO-YEAR CONTRACT with INDUS LUBRICATING for OIL PRODUCTS used by the CITY’S FLEET MANAGEMENT DIVISION and FIRE GARAGE, as Outlined.

J. Communication from the City Manager and Director of Public Works Requesting Approval of a CONTRACT with FOTH INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIRONMENT for 2010 ENGINEERING SERVICES for the PEORIA CITY/COUNTY LANDFILL, in the Amount of $376,000.00, as Recommended by the Peoria City/County Landfill Committee.

K. Communication from the City Manager and Director of Public Works Requesting Approval of a SEWER IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT with the GREATER PEORIA SANITARY DISTRICT for the REPAIR of SEWERS, as a Part of the City of Peoria’s Sewer Rehabilitation (Design Area 1 Sewers, Manhole Rehabilitation Project 3), and Requesting Concurrence in the Award of the CONTRACT for the Work to MIDWEST TRENCHLESS SERVICES, in the Amount of $358,660.00.

L. Communication from the City Manager and Finance Director/Comptroller Requesting Adoption of an ORDINANCE ABATING the TAX Heretofore Levied to PAY SPECIAL SERVICE AREA TAXES on the RIVERWEST NEIGHBORHOOD (Formerly the Colonel John Warner Homes Development).

M. Communication from the City Manager and Finance Director/Comptroller Requesting Approval of an ORDINANCE Partially ABATING the TAX Heretofore LEVIED to PAY PRINCIPAL OF and INTEREST ON GENERAL OBLIGATION LIBRARY BONDS SERIES 2008A, in the Amount of $798,000.00.

N. Communication from the City Manager and Finance Director/Comptroller Requesting Approval of the ORDINANCE ABATING the TAX Heretofore LEVIED to PAY PRINCIPAL OF and INTEREST ON GENERAL OBLIGATION CORPORATE PURPOSE BONDS, of the City of Peoria,1998 SERIES C, 2002 SERIES A & B, 2003 SERIES A & B, 2004 SERIES B & C, 2005 SERIES A & B, 2007 SERIES A, and 2009 SERIES A.

O. Communication from the City Manager and Finance Director/Comptroller Requesting Adoption of an ORDINANCE Amending the CITY OF PEORIA BUDGET for FISCAL YEAR 2010 Relating to the OUTSTANDING ENCUMBRANCES as of DECEMBER 31, 2009, in the Amount of $6,481,002.00.

P. Communication from the City Manager Requesting Approval of the Following:

1. TRANSFER of PROPERTY Located at 720 E. PARK AVENUE to PEORIA AREA COMMUNITY EVENTS (P.A.C.E.) FOUNDATION for the Amount of $1.00, and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Necessary Documents;

2. ADOPT an ORDINANCE VACATING a PORTION of LAKE VIEW AVENUE Approximately 315 FEET NORTHEAST of PERRY AVENUE.

Q. Communication from the City Manager and Corporation Counsel Requesting Approval of DATES for SCHEDULED EVENTS SPONSORED by PEORIA AREA COMMUNITY EVENTS, INC. (P.A.C.E.), Subject to Their Filing the Necessary Permits and Approval as Required by the Peoria City Code. Dates Scheduled are: Steamboat Festival – June 17 through 19, 2010; Taste of Peoria – August 11, 2010 (Rain Date: August 12, 2010); Labor Day Picnic – September 6, 2010; and RibFest & Chili Cookoff – October 1 and 2, 2010.

R. Communication from the City Manager and Corporation Counsel Requesting Approval of a SITE APPLICATION for a CLASS A (Tavern) LIQUOR LICENSE at 7719 N. UNIVERSITY, with Recommendation from the Liquor Commission to Approve.

S. Communication from the City Manager Regarding the PEORIA PARK DISTRICT FOURTH QUARTER 2009 REPORT of ACTIVITIES for the RIVERFRONT and GATEWAY BUILDING, with Recommendation to Receive and File.

T. Communication from the City Manager with Request to ACCEPT the PEORIA PARK DISTRICT RIVERFRONT PROGRAMMING WORK PROGRAM AND BUDGET REPORT for 2010.

U. REPORT of the CITY TREASURER PATRICK NICHTING for the MONTH of DECEMBER 2009, with Recommendation to Receive and File.

Item Q removed by Montelongo. Jacob abstaining on Q and R, removes item F. Motion to approve remaining items by Spain, seconded by Turner; passes unanimously.

  • Item F: Motion to approve Jacob; Spears seconds; passes unanimously.
  • Item Q: Montelongo moves to approve; Spain seconds; passes unanimously.

ITEM NO. 2 Communication from the City Manager Requesting Approval of the CITY OF PEORIA’S PORTION of the COMMUNITY LEGISLATIVE AGENDA Regarding FY2011 CONGRESSIONAL APPROPRIATION REQUESTS.

City Manager Scott Moore asks if staff can bring this item back at a later date so they can be discussed at next week’s policy session before submitting. Motion to defer by Van Auken; seconded by Riggenbach. Motion passes unanimously.

ITEM NO. 3 Communication from the City Manager and Corporation Counsel Requesting Approval of the MAIN CONSTRUCTION and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT with ILLINOIS-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY, and Requesting Authorization for the City Manager to Execute the Necessary Documents.

Irving moves to approve; seconded by Van Auken. Sandberg asks for clarification, that the City is not obligated to build water main extensions; it would be the developer’s responsibility. City attorney Randy Ray assures Sandberg that the City is not obligated. Motion passes 10-1 (Sandberg).

ITEM NO. 4 Communication from the City Manager and Director of Planning and Growth Management with Request to Concur with Either the Recommendation from the Zoning Commission to ADOPT or Concur with the Recommendation from the Staff to DENY the Following:

A. ORDINANCE Rezoning Property Located at 1717 W. GLEN AVENUE from the Present Class R3 (Single Family Residential) District to a Class O2 (Exclusive Office Park) District, with Conditions;

B. ORDINANCE Amending Ordinance No. 13,345, a Previous Use with Approval as Amended, for a SPECIAL USE in a Class O2 (Exclusive Office Park) District for an OFFICE DEVELOPMENT Commonly Known as the GLEN PARK PLACE OFFICE PARK to Add the Property Located at 1717 W. GLEN AVENUE and Allow for a BUILDING ADDITION and PARKING LOT for Property Located at 4909 N. GLEN PARK PLACE and 1717 W. GLEN AVENUE, with Conditions.

Councilman Spears moves to approve ordinance A; seconded by Van Auken; passes unanimously.

Spears moves to approve ordinance B; seconded by Riggenbach; passes unanimously.

ITEM NO. 5 Communication from the City Manager and Director of Planning and Growth Management with Request to Concur with Recommendations from the Historic Preservation Commission Contained within the ACTION PLAN to:

A. ADOPT an ORDINANCE Amending CHAPTER 16 of the Code of the City of Peoria Related to the DESIGNATION PROCESS and the CERTIFICATE of APPROPRIATENESS PROCESS;

B. APPROVE a PROCEDURAL CHANGE Related to HOUSING and DEMOLITION CASES; and

C. RECEIVE and FILE a COMMUNITY LIST of PROPERTY NOTED as WORTHY OF POTENTIAL HISTORIC LANDMARK STATUS and the LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS.

Van Auken asks chair of Historic Preservation Commission, Robert Powers, to speak before she makes a motion. Powers gives a history of the ad hoc committee that worked on this council request. He also gave an explanation of the request, which is basically a restatement of what is written here. Van Auken thanks the ad hoc committee and compliments them.

Van Auken moves to approve item A; seconded by Montelongo. Sandberg also compliments the committee. However, he suggests a couple small amendments limiting the number of colors one can have on their house without having to get a certificate of appropriateness. Sandberg moves that Item A be deferred until May 11; seconded by Gulley. The reason is so neighborhood organizations and other stakeholders who live in historic districts have time to read and clearly understand the ordinance before final action is taken. Van Auken supports deferral. Motion passes unanimously.

Van Auken moves to approve item B; seconded by Spain. Jacob asks if this ordinance will unduly delay the process of demolishing other structures. Planning and Growth Director Landes answers: No. Inspections Director Kunski agrees. Motion passes unanimously.

Van Auken moves to receive and file item C; seconded by Gulley. The floor is opened to anyone who would like to address the council on this item.

  • Margaret Cousin: Reads a prepared speech about the virtues of historic preservation, complete with dramatic analogy about being a ball instead of a cube. Cue violins. (I’m sure she was sincere; I’m just jaded.)
  • Jim Bateman: Spoke off the cuff. Makes snide comment about the city losing a previous list that was also received and filed! (“No one can find it. I guess that’s what happens when you receive and file.” LOL!) For the most part he reiterated information already presented. He did explain that the list is a list of historic properties and includes properties that are already landmarked, properties in historic districts, and properties that could potentially be landmarked.
  • Roger Meyer: Member of Trinity Lutheran Church, speaking for the church. Requests removal of the church building (135 NE Randolph) because it’s a church building and changes to the sanctuary shouldn’t be subject to a secular body. Believes all churches on the list should be taken off the list.

Van Auken basically says in response to Mr. Meyer that they’re not going to take any properties off the list at this time.

Turner asks if merely being on the list will cause a hardship — i.e., will it make it difficult for property owners to sell properties that are on the list? Van Auken says no; preservation is economical and reusing properties is sustainable development. She also says the ordinance is “not as onerous as people think it is.” Sandberg agrees with Van Auken. “There’s a whole cadre of developers who will only invest in historic properties,” he says. “Historic preservation is not a negative in almost all cases.”

Sandberg would like to see historic properties put on the City’s website, not just received and filed. He’d like to see us “show off” our historic community.

Jacob asks if all areas of the community were included. Bateman says “we tried,” and says that there very well could be properties that they missed. He says he hopes the list will be a work in progress. The list is not exclusive and can have properties added to it. Jacob says that there is a perception among some developers that the historic preservation ordinance has been used as a weapon to stop some development; he wants to make sure property rights are preserved.

Spain is “conflicted on this issue.” He’s received calls from property owners who are concerned about their properties being on the list. Yet, he recognizes that the City Council asked for this list because of previous attempts to landmark properties at the eleventh hour. So, he wants to know what the process is to get off the list. Bateman says the problem is one of uncertainty — will the property fall under the ordinance or not? In a perfect world, all the properties on the list would have applications drawn up and decided in short order to take the uncertainty out of it. “That’s in a perfect world, but we live in Peoria.” So, his suggestion is to try to get the applications done as quickly as possible, but recognize it’s going to take time to get through 115 properties. Bottom line, the way to get off the list is for the property to fail the landmarking process. Spain concludes that he will support this item.

Montelongo will be supporting this item, and would like to see a process for getting properties on and off the list.

Motion passes unanimously. That was a lot of discussion on a motion to receive and file!

UNFINISHED BUSINESS

(09-616) Communication from the City Manager and Director of Planning and Growth Management with a REQUEST TO DEFER for 30 DAYS a REPORT BACK Regarding CONDITIONS to ENTER into an ANNUAL CONTRACT with the EAST BLUFF NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES (EBNHS) Related to Ordinance No. 14,534.

Riggenbach reports that they have had some “really productive negotiations” in the last couple of weeks. He would like to defer the item for two weeks instead of 30 days. Moves to defer two weeks; seconded by Irving; motion passes unanimously.

NEW BUSINESS

  • Turner mentions a couple upcoming boys tournaments.
  • Spain moves to remove item 09-506 from the table and place it on the 2/23/10 council meeting; seconded by Gulley. Passes unanimously. Item 09-506 was from the October 27, 2009, council meeting: “Communication from the City Manager and Director of Public Works with Recommendation to ACCEPT the LOW BID of ILLINOIS CIVIL CONTRACTORS, INC., and to Award a CONTRACT, in the Amount of $492,382.70, Plus a 5% Base Bid Contingency of $21,753.14 for the JEFFERSON AVENUE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS.” I didn’t cover that council meeting, so I don’t know why it was deferred, if any reason was given at all.
  • Ardis will host a “community call to action” forum at the Dream Center this Saturday at 10 a.m.

PRESENTATION

ITEM NO. 1 PRESENTATION by the ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL Regarding the FOURTH QUARTER 2009 PERFORMANCE INITIATIVES Under the SCOPE of WORK for the CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT Between the City of Peoria and the Economic Development Council, with Request to Receive and File.

Van Auken moves to receive and file, seconded by Montelongo. Spain is abstaining due to the EDC’s relationship with his empoyer. Presentation ensues. Technical difficulties precluded the use of a PowerPoint presentation. I think it was sabotage. 🙂 Kidding. Motion passes unanimously.

CITIZEN REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL

Nobody wants to address the council tonight. And there was much rejoicing.

EXECUTIVE SESSION

ADJOURNMENT

Spears moves to go into executive session, seconded by Riggenbach; passes unanimously. And then they move to adjourn and we’re done!

I realized right before Citizens to Address that somehow the ability to leave comments on this post was turned off. I do not know how that happened, but that’s really annoying! I was having some technical difficulties with this post early on, so something must have gotten messed up then. Sorry if you wanted to leave a comment earlier and couldn’t.

Goodnight everyone!

General News, Movies

Speaking of IMAX, have you heard of “fake IMAX”?

1 Comment

Frequent commenter “Mahkno” mentioned in response to a previous post that “IMAX was [as of the last time he looked into it] moving away from the singular movie theatre venues. Their principle growth has been in partnering with large theatre chains to sell their IMAX brand, equipment, and format. It might be more likely at this point that one of the area multiplexes would adopt the IMAX format before the museum would.”

As a matter of fact, IMAX has indeed been partnering with large theater chains, including Goodrich Quality Theaters (which owns Willow Knolls 14 in Peoria) and AMC (which will soon own ShowPlace 14 in Pekin). But these multiplex IMAX theaters are not the same as standalone IMAX theaters. They’re smaller. A lot smaller. In fact, here are a couple of screen-size comparisons that I’ve shamelessly swiped from other websites (here [WARNING: lots of profanity] and here):

Click on the images to enlarge. As you can see, the retrofitted multiplex theaters don’t really hold a candle to a true IMAX giant-screen experience. But that really isn’t what has gotten everyone so upset. After all, the screen is larger than most multiplex screens, and the sound is far better.

What bothers critics — including Roger Ebert — is that IMAX is not differentiating these smaller theaters from their traditional giant-screen theaters. So Joe Blow goes to his local AMC multiplex and plunks down an extra five bucks for the IMAX experience, walks into the theater and… surprise! It’s not a giant-screen theater, but just a slightly-larger-than-average multiplex theater screen. And he feels scammed. Ebert offers some common-sense advice:

But apparently, IMAX is not going to do any such thing. This whole outrage over what many are calling “fake IMAX” broke out nearly a year ago, and so far no differentiation has been forthcoming from IMAX.

Nevertheless, given AMC’s deal with IMAX and the fact that AMC is buying Kerasotes Theatres, I wonder if the museum might have some competition for landing a local IMAX theater. Time will tell.

General News, Movies

AMC is buying Kerasotes ShowPlace Theatres

Leave a comment

With the exception of three theaters, Kerasotes is selling its entire chain to AMC. That means the Kerasotes ShowPlace 14 in Pekin will be acquired if the sale receives regulatory approval. Incidentally, for you local history buffs out there, before the ShowPlace 14 (originally the ShowPlace 12) was built, this was the site of the Starlite Drive-In Theater, one of several drive-in theaters in the greater Peoria area. It was destroyed by fire in October 1991. The drive-in was owned by Kerasotes Theatres, and when it burned down, they opted not to rebuild it, but instead put up the largest local multiplex at the time. You may recall that there was another theater chain in the area with a similar name: George Kerasotes Corp., or GKC. (Anyone remember the jingle? “Tonight I feel like GKC!”) It was unaffiliated with Kerasotes Theatres and was sold to Carmike Cinemas in 2005.

Now it looks like the Kerasotes name may soon be gone forever from the area. Here’s the press release:

Kansas City, Mo. (Jan. 19, 2010) – AMC Entertainment Inc. (“AMC”), and Kerasotes Showplace Theatres, LLC (“Kerasotes”), two leading theatrical exhibition and entertainment companies in the U.S., announced today that they have entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which AMC will acquire substantially all of the assets of Kerasotes. Kerasotes owns 96 theatres and 973 screens in mid-sized, suburban and metropolitan markets, primarily in the Midwest. More than three quarters of the Kerasotes theatres feature stadium seating and almost 90 percent have been newly built since 1994. Following the consummation of the proposed transaction, Tony and Dean Kerasotes will retain and operate their two new ICON concept theatres in Minneapolis, MN and Chicago, IL; and one Showplace theatre in Secaucus, NJ. Kerasotes is currently owned by the Kerasotes family and Providence Equity Partners.

“Combining Kerasotes’ highly-regarded assets and operations with our own is a natural way for us to continue re-defining the future of our industry,” said Gerry Lopez, AMC CEO and president. “With almost 200 years in the exhibition business between us, our collective experiences and our complementary geographic footprints will allow us to maintain the reputation for excellence and leadership that is part of each company’s culture.”

“Our team has delivered a consistent, high quality experience for customers, and we have appreciated Providence’s partnership over the last six years in helping Kerasotes grow into the sixth largest motion picture exhibition company in North America” said Tony Kerasotes, Chief Executive Officer. “We expect these theatres will be a strong addition to the AMC theatre circuit, and look forward to successfully completing the transaction with AMC and to beginning our next chapter.”

Completion of the acquisition is subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions for transactions of this type, including Department of Justice antitrust approval.

Museum Block, Peoria County

How are those IMAX negotiations coming?

8 Comments

During the run up to last April’s referendum, I talked to many people who were going to vote in favor of the museum tax. One of the big selling features for many of them was the proposed IMAX theater that would be included as part of the package. The museum group wasn’t shy about touting the IMAX. They included it by name on their marketing materials. When Citizens for Responsible Spending pointed out that the museum group had no contract with IMAX, museum officials defended their use of the IMAX brand name and explained that they couldn’t sign a contract until the referendum passed, but that they had a contract sitting on their desks ready to sign.

It’s now been ten months, and there is still no signed contract with IMAX. More tellingly, museum officials have stopped using the IMAX brand name. In their presentation to the Peoria County Board last Thursday, it was consistently referred to as a “large screen theater” or a “giant screen theater.” When board member Brad Harding asked if it was an IMAX or a large screen theater, Lakeview’s chairman of the board stated that they can’t use the IMAX brand name because they don’t have a contract signed with IMAX yet. He did say they were still negotiating with IMAX, however.

I sincerely hope that the IMAX negotiations are successful. Because if there is no IMAX, it will be one of the biggest bait-and-switch swindles ever propagated on Peoria taxpayers.

Bradley University

Bradley student senate wants new mascot committee

5 Comments

The Bradley Scout reports:

Student Senate passed a resolution this week calling for University President Joanne Glasser to form a mascot committee. If formed, that committee would be responsible for slating ideas for a new mascot….

[Student Body President Kyle] Malinowski said there are several reasons senate wants to make the change now. Philosophically, it fits with the Campaign for a Bradley Renaissance because of the mindset of being in a renaissance as well as campus’ physical changes.

“The less philosophical reason is we have the best people in the position right now to do it,” he said. “We have a new university president who is all about shaking things up, a new athletic director, a new director of marketing whose job was charged by President Glasser to brand the university and we’ll eventually have a new provost.”

In 1993, Bradley decided to keep the Braves name, but use a bobcat as its mascot. In 2000, officials said the students had a “lack of affinity” for the bobcat and got rid of it. Then a survey for a new mascot was circulated in 2006-7 resulting in several options (including oddities like a fighting squirrel and a clock tower) but the university didn’t choose any of them.

Museum Block, Peoria County

Same song, second verse from museum group

26 Comments

March 6, 2009:

Although a funding gap of about $11 million to build the Peoria Riverfront Museum would remain even if Peoria County voters approve a sales tax increase next month, project officials say they are confident a successful referendum will trigger the final donations.

“We will go out after the referendum is passed, and while it won’t be a piece of cake, we do feel that once we get over the hurdle of the referendum, the other $11 million can be put together,” said Mark Johnson, project manager of the Caterpillar Experience, the Cat visitor’s center that will share the Downtown block with the museum.

April 8, 2009:

The $40 million county contribution to the $77 million museum doesn’t fully fund the project; a $10 million funding gap remains…. Officials are looking at the possibility of federal economic stimulus money to help pay for the parking garage and other public money in a capital budget out of Springfield. Vergon said he thinks the money will be raised one way or another.

“We’ve got a capital campaign to restart,” he said. “It shouldn’t be too difficult to do that because most of the people that had not pledged or committed were concerned whether we’d get all the public money or not, and it looks like that seems to be behind us now.”

May 21, 2009:

Initially short about $10.2 million even with the $40 million raised through the voter-approved Peoria County sales tax increase, the funding gap to build the Peoria Riverfront Museum is narrowing.

“We knew there were people who didn’t want to formally commit to a donation until after the referendum to see which way the vote went,” said Michael Bryant, the CEO of Methodist Medical Center, who also heads the group of area leaders and business people – called the CEO Roundtable – that is raising money for the museum.

“We are seeing that those people are stepping up right now and committing money to this project.” Bryant said the new shortfall is about $7.2 million, meaning the project has received about $3 million in donations since the quarter-percent sales tax referendum was approved by voters 50.7 percent to 49.3 percent 44 days ago. “We’d like to see the gap closed all the way by the end of the summer,’ Bryant said. ‘I’m cautiously optimistic it can be done.”

February 4, 2010:

Governance agreements for the Peoria Riverfront Museum are within sight, paving the way for construction to begin this summer, though the Museum Collaboration Group is saddled with a $7.2 million revenue gap.

So, to sum up, there was a $10.2 to $11 million private funding gap before the referendum in 2009. Not to worry, museum supporters assured us. Once the referendum passes, they were confident they could raise the rest of the money. After the referendum passed, the CEO Roundtable went to work and raised $3 million in a little over a month.

And that’s it. Since May 2009, the funding gap has remained at $7.2 million. A child conceived when the last dollar was raised for the museum could have been born by now.

Not to worry, though. Lakeview Museum Board of Directors Chairman Tom Bardwell told the County Board on Thursday how they plan to close that gap:

We strongly believe that, through research and also conversations in the community and everything that’s happening right now, we believe there’s about $4 million that can be raised in private dollars here in Peoria County or in the local area.

We also believe there’s about a million and a half dollars — in fact, we have a target for about $3 million of line-of-sight that we can see, but let’s be conservative and say a million and a half dollars — from either grants, foundations, other government entities that may make pledges towards this project, which basically takes you five and a half million.

And then there’s also a third avenue of funding we’re pursuing — some of you may have heard some of this — something called New Market Tax Credits. New Market Tax Credits are something we’re pursuing for this project. We believe, conservatively, $4 million should be our target number.

So, our funding strategy is targeted to raise about nine and a half million dollars which is obviously about the $7.2 million gap, but obviously we want to be as conservative as possible in those numbers, so we hope to get there as soon as we can….

Note that their plan to close the private funding gap includes efforts to get $4 million in public funding via the New Markets Tax Credit program. They’re also trying to get public funding from “other government entities.” And despite the fact they’ve not raised any money the past nine months, we’re supposed to believe there’s still $4 million in private funding out there based on their “research” and “conversations.” These are the same people who assured us the funding gap would be closed right after the referendum passed.

Why should we believe any of this? What possible reason is there to have any confidence in the museum group’s fundraising plans? In fact, other than the $3 million raised after the referendum passed, fundraising efforts have been effectively stalled for years, which is why the museum group came to Peoria County for tax funding in the first place.

Instead of this eternal effort to bleed the region for money, the museum should do what it should have done years ago: change its plans. Redesign the building so it’s more efficient to build. Build up instead of out, which will free up more of the block for private commercial development. Dispense with the parking deck, as there is already a glut of available parking downtown, especially along the riverfront. Cutting the deck (pun intended) and/or redesigning the building would also remove the engineering challenge/expense of putting a boomerang-shaped building partially on top of a rectangular deck. If just those things were done, millions of taxpayer dollars would be saved, and the project could be built without any additional fundraising.

The first step in problem solving is to correctly identify the problem. The problem here is not a fundraising problem. It’s a design problem. The project is too large and too expensive. Caterpillar should be using its influence to get the museum group to do their part in reducing expenses instead of bullying the County into building something unaffordable and unsustainable.

Museum Block, Peoria County

County caving to Cat on museum

47 Comments

Looks like the Peoria County Board is set to capitulate to Caterpillar’s demands. In Caterpillar’s letter of January 20, they gave this ultimatum:

Our message to the Peoria County Board is clear: We must have a deadline or the work for the museum project will continue to languish; the county must modify its governance demands to allow museum activists and professionals to run the PRM; and the Board must help close the funding gap caused by the loss of New Marketing Tax Credits … the county’s contribution needs to be the full $40 million authorized.

In the absence of a positive response from the Peoria County Board by February 12, 2010, Caterpillar doesn’t believe this project can be viable. Failure to move forward in a responsive manner will result in Caterpillar withdrawing its funding commitment for a PRM and termination of our plans to move forward with the Caterpillar Visitor Center.

According to Peoria County Board member Merle Widmer, the County has drawn up an agreement that dutifully complies with Caterpillar’s demands. “The board will be asked to increase the amount voted to give the museum committee to $40 million instead of the $34.7 million the board voted on to help make up the shortage in the endowment,” he reports. “To accept ownership of the building, the County Board will be asked to approve a minimum of three contracts totaling 120 pages . . . and containing such language ‘that a board member can be removed without cause’, an advisory committee (all agreeing to the museum mission) of not more than 60, several layers of boards with the county owning the building forever.”

And if you ever thought the County Board was a professional, deliberative body, looking out for the best interests of taxpayers and thoughtfully considering both sides of an issue, Mr. Widmer adds an account of this conversation, recorded in closed session when at a meeting from which he was absent: “…Mike Phelan, Democrat County Board member [told] the Executive Committee to disregard Merle Widmer and get on with building this museum. He said the public voted on it and the public wants this museum…. He also said board members comments should be limited tommorrow afternoon and Board Chairman, Tom O’Neill said something about ‘putting a sleeping pill in his water.'”

Impolite comments about fellow board members aside, Mr. Phelan forgets that voters were told in town hall meetings that the county would be financing $34.7 million of the cost, and that the museum group would be responsible for raising the rest of the money. Caterpillar is blaming the County for the supposed loss of $5 million in New Market Tax Credits, and are demanding $5.3 million in additional funding from sales tax receipts. No independent proof of this supposed “loss” has been produced, at least publicly. Nevertheless, it appears the County is willing to take the rap for the alleged loss and plug the hole with yet more public funding. All the while, there is still a huge question of whether the other private money that has been supposedly raised will materialize. Most of it is in the form of pledges that have yet to be collected.

A Committee of the Whole meeting will take place today (Thursday) at 3 p.m. at the Peoria County Courthouse.

2010 Election

Local Election Results 2/2/2010

26 Comments

Peoria County Sheriff:

  City County Total Pct
x-Mike McCoy 5,911 4,511 10,422 72.88%
Vince Wieland 2,010 1,869 3,879 27.12%

Peoria Board of Education, District 3:

  City County Total Pct
Ernestine Jackson 1,144 5 1,149 17.59%
x-Christopher Crawford 3,435 17 3,452 52.84%
Jeff Lickiss 1,921 11 1,932 29.57%

Peoria County Board, Dist. 1:

  Total Pct
David Williams 109 42.91%
x-Bonnie Hester 145 57.09%

Peoria County Board, Dist. 5:

  Total Pct
x-Rachael Parker 248 54.75%
Bud Sous 205 45.25%

Brimfield Community Unit School District 309 $13.9 million bond to build a new high school:

  Total Pct
x-Yes 802 61.93%
No 493 38.07%

10th Judicial Circuit (Barra vacancy) – Republican:

  Peoria (City) Peoria Tazewell Putnam Marshall Stark Total Pct
x-Michael Risinger 3,029 2,791 6,823 162 566 508 13,879 47.13%
Kate Gorman 4,083 2,760 5,512 171 673 366 13,565 46.06%
Verne Dentino 625 575 668 23 81 32 2,004 6.81%

10th Judicial Circuit (Vespa vacancy) – Republican:

  Peoria (City) Peoria Tazewell Putnam Marshall Stark Total Pct
x-John Vespa 4,077 3,312 4,688 191 807 489 13,564 46.84%
Valerie Umholtz 2,432 1,837 6,447 111 326 222 11,375 39.28%
Bruce Thiemann 1,177 879 1,607 55 164 140 4,022 13.89%
Peoria Public Schools

Schau made $6.5 million “accounting error” in previous job

114 Comments

Main Township High School District 207 in suburban Chicago is having a serious budget crisis. According to the Daily Herald, they are looking at cutting 137 jobs, 75 of them teachers. Why?

After months of alluding to an “accounting error” that led to a larger-than-anticipated deficit that year, District 207 administrators last week explained how it happened.

The district’s current leaders learned last July – weeks after Superintendent Joel Morris and Assistant Superintendent for Business Pamela Schau [emphasis added] retired – that a projected deficit of $3.8 million for the 2008-09 fiscal year was actually $10.3 million.

Pamela Schau became the Comptroller/Treasurer at Peoria Public School District 150 right after she retired from District 207 in July 2009, replacing Guy Cahill. The Daily Herald article continues:

What officials didn’t anticipate was the additional $6.5 million deficit due to the then-administration’s failure to include some expenses in that year’s budget, current Assistant Superintendent for Business Mary Kalou said.

Those missed expenses were salaries and benefits for some of the 12 newly hired teachers and teaching assistants and increased district contribution toward the Teacher Retirement System per changes made to the teachers contract – amounting to $2.4 million.

The district also saw a dip that year in property tax revenues – personal property tax receipts came in 1 percent lower or $1.5 million under what was budgeted and corporate property taxes were down $500,000 as per the report from the
free invoice template used by most of the business- that weren’t known until after Kalou joined the district last July 1.

“It’s hard to say what they should, shouldn’t have done,” Kalou said. “Hindsight is always going to be 20/20. (With taxes) you can’t predict with certainty what that trend is going to be for … it was a reasonable amount to budget.”

Other contributors to the deficit were two unexpected early retirements – including Schau – that cost the district a $300,000 penalty under state law, and lower than expected revenues from the district’s book store, summer school and tuition, she added.

An anonymous commenter on the Daily Herald article suggested that District 207, under Superintendent Ken Wallace, “paid a nearly 200,000 penalty to TRS to hasten the departure of error-maker Pam Schau.” Consider the source on that last comment. Sometimes anonymous commenters are ignorant cranks with an axe to grind; other times they are conscientious citizens with insider information they could get fired (or compromise their source) for sharing on the record. Wallace was quoted in the June 26 (2009) Journal Star as saying Schau is a “really, really bright, talented person … genuinely a nice person, good people skills, good problem solving – Peoria would be well served, lucky, to get her.”

A request for comment from Ms. Schau was not immediately answered.