All posts by C. J. Summers

I am a fourth-generation Peorian, married with three children.

Primary election results and comment

18th Congressional District (Republican)

Aaron Schock 55,576 71%
Jim McConoughey 13,307 17%
John Morris 9,108 12%

The only thing surprising about the outcome of this race is the margin of victory. Schock was expected to win with at least a plurality, but most likely a small majority of votes. Instead, he won in a landslide, getting over 70% of the vote in a three-way race. I don’t think this can be characterized as anything less than a mandate. This primary gives Schock tremendous momentum going into the general election in a traditionally conservative district.

Republican voters evidently were not concerned about Schock’s early foreign policy gaffe when he suggested that the U.S. sell “Pershing nuclear missiles” to Taiwan in an attempt to pressure China to stop aiding Iran. Rather, they looked to Schock’s constituent services, his conservative record, and his youthfulness and energy. Schock’s name recognition and campaign experience certainly helped him as well.

92nd Legislative District (Democrat)

Jehan Gordon 5,694 52%
Allen Mayer 5,332 48%

County Board member Allen Mayer did very well in the county, collecting roughly two-thirds of the votes there. However, in the city, Jehan Gordon won well over half the votes, and since the city has more voters than the county, she rode those city votes to a slim victory. Only 362 votes separated the two candidates when all was said and done. There was a large number of undervotes in this race (voters who skipped this contest, not voting for either candidate), as much as 10% in the county and 11% in the city.

Gordon did better in early voting results than in the election, likely due to controversy that came to light late in her campaign. A radio ad indicated she had graduated from the University of Illinois, when in fact she was still three hours short of a degree. Then, just a couple weeks before the election, she admitted to select news outlets (WEEK-TV and the Journal Star only) that she had been convicted of shoplifting in Champaign County nearly eight years ago when she was 18. Her missteps evidently turned off a few voters, but enough were unconcerned or forgiving, making her the primary winner.

Not reported in the mainstream media was the fact that she left her shoplifting fines unpaid until January this year, almost eight years after the incident, after she entered the race, and just days before she admitted her indiscretion to select media. Why this information went unreported is mystifying to me, but journalists I’ve talked to frankly didn’t find it all that newsworthy.

Ms. Gordon goes into the general election without a mandate, and the issues that came out in the primary are likely to follow her through this year’s campaign. She’ll face Joan Krupa, CEO of Heartland Community Health Clinic. Cindy Ardis-Jenkins is the candidate that appeared on ballots for the Republican nomination, but she dropped out of the race before the primary, and Republican party officials appointed Krupa to run in the general election.

U. S. Senate (Republican)

Steve Sauerberg 370,204 56%
Andy Martin 225,069 34%
Mike Psak 69,812 10%

Willowbrook medical doctor Steve Sauerberg won the nomination handily, beating out perennial candidate Andy Martin and truck driver Mike Psak. The Senate race hasn’t gotten much coverage because it would take a miracle for anyone to unseat Democrat Dick Durbin. He’s the second-highest ranking Democrat in the Senate and has a huge campaign war chest. It’s not unprecedented for such a strong incumbent to lose in a general election, but it is rare, and highly unlikely this year especially.

Peoria County Auditor (Democrat)

Carol Van Winkle 13,090 70%
Kent Rotherham 5,499 30%

When Rotherham got on the phone to talk about conceding to Van Winkle in this race, he sounded incredulous. Van Winkle was appointed to the position after Steve Sonnemaker took the Peoria County Clerk position, and she’s not a certified public accountant. Rotherham, a CPA himself, says that not having a CPA as county auditor is like not having a lawyer as state’s attorney. He’s considering running against Van Winkle again in the general election as an independent candidate.

Peoria County Coroner (Republican)

Johnna Ingersoll 12,362 72%
George Blackburn 4,746 28%

Ingersoll handily dispatched challenger George Blackburn in the coroner’s race. There had been some controversy in the past over how quickly she got the county morgue established and operational, and how long it took to hire a forensic pathologist. But since those issues have been resolved now (and resolved well, I should add; the forensic pathologist is shared with McLean County and is paid on a per-incident basis rather than being on salary with benefits, which saves the county money), Blackburn was unable to get any traction on them in his bid to unseat the incumbent Ingersoll. Blackburn also tried to make hay of Ingersoll’s lack of a college degree, but that didn’t give him much of a boost either.

This race is deja vu all over again for all the candidates — the same candidates ran in the primary four years ago, with the same outcome. Ingersoll will face Democrat Steve Schmidt in the general election; that’s also a repeat of the last election. It’s hard to unseat an incumbent in races that are not high-profile, and in the absence of any scandal to compel voters to look to another candidate.

Some voters getting wrong ballot

Eyebrows McGee ran into some trouble at the polling place today. She was only allowed to vote in federal races, not local ones. The poll workers didn’t know how to fix it, so essentially, through no fault of her own, Eyebrows was denied her right to vote in local elections.

I’ve e-mailed Tom Bride at the Election Commission asking him about this situation, but as you might expect, he’s a little busy today, so I don’t expect to hear from him any time soon.

On the positive side, this wasn’t an equipment failure, but rather human error. But on the negative side, the problem is reportedly widespread, which means this problem could cause some headaches if the vote is at all close in any of the races today.

UPDATE: I heard from Tom Bride. He said the problem is not system-wide; there are actually only a handful of cases. In each case, it was human error. The judge is supposed to compare the application to the code receipt to make sure they match.

The important thing to remember is this — if you get the wrong ballot, this situation can be corrected provided you haven’t hit “cast ballot” the final time. Once you hit “cast ballot” and get the American flag waving on the screen, it’s like dropping a ballot in the ballot box and you can’t get it back. Any time before that, however, they can void out your ballot and let you start over, including providing you with the proper ballot.

Peoria Board of Education undermines teacher, changes grade

A kid gets a “C” in English. His parent appeals the grade. The principal sides with the teacher. The parent appeals again. Everyone up to and including Superintendent Ken Hinton side with the teacher. Then the appeal goes to the Peoria Board of Education. The Board votes 5-2 to change the grade to a “B.” To their credit, board members Stowell and Parker voted against the change.

The third-year English teacher, JoAnna Moe, told District 150 School Board members she gave the junior ample opportunity to better the grade, but issued a “C” for the lack of effort the student put into an enriched English project.

According to the district’s policy manual (§6:280):

Every teacher shall maintain an evaluation record for each student in the teacher’s classroom. The final grade assigned by the teacher cannot be changed by a District administrator without notifying the teacher. Reasons for changing a student’s final grade include:

  • a miscalculation of test scores;
  • a technical error in assigning a particular grade or score;
  • the teacher agrees to allow the student to do extra work that may impact the grade;
  • an inappropriate grading system used to determine the grade; or
  • an inappropriate grade based on an appropriate grading system.

Should a grade change be made, the administrator making the change must sign the changed record.

In this case, the administrators upheld the grade given by the teacher. One wonders what reason or authority the school board had for changing it based on the above criteria. The paper states that the appeal “eventually made its way to the board by school district rules, similar to cases involving suspensions and expulsions.” But after looking at the policy manual, including the section on suspensions and expulsions and the uniform grievance procedure, I could find no written policy on appealing a grade to the school board after it had been upheld by the administration.

The teachers certainly see this as precedent-setting. A petition signed by 70 teachers and staff members backed up the teacher. Scott Schifeling, Peoria Federation of Teachers President, was quoted in the Journal Star as saying, “I’ve never seen it go to this level. … I think it sets a very bad precedent.”

For its part, the school board won’t comment on the matter, hiding behind confidentiality rules and laws. So we can’t find out who the student was to know if this was the child of an influential person in the community, for instance; nor do we know what the school board’s reasoning was for overturning the unanimous decision of their entire staff of administrators and teachers.

What’s really incredible is that this is not changing a grade from failing to passing, or changing a grade from a “B” to and “A” to preserve some sort of perfect grade point average. Instead, it changes the grade from a “C” to a “B” — for reasons we’ll apparently never know.

What we do know is that the entire staff of District 150 is now demoralized, and teachers and parents will be forgiven for questioning the board’s commitment to high academic standards for District 150 students.

Kay Royster fired from another school district

Kay RoysterFrom the St. Louis Post-Dispatch:

JENNINGS — The school board voted 4-3 on Monday night to buy out Superintendent Kay Royster’s contract, which was to run through June 2009. The buyout was estimated to cost about $230,000.

Royster had come under fire in recent months, accused by teachers in public meetings of allowing reserve funds to dwindle, hiring unnecessary administrators and failing to implement a $1.5 million computer program.

Hat tip: WMBD Radio.

Go vote, then listen to WCBU tonight

The polls are now open! Don’t forget to vote today. For information on voting in Peoria County and the City of Peoria, check out PeoriaVotes.com. You can view a sample ballot, learn how to navigate the electronic voting machine, and find out where the polling place is for your precinct.

I’ll be joining Jonathan Ahl tonight on WCBU 89.9 FM to talk about the election results. NPR will be having wall-to-wall coverage of the national races, while Jonathan and I will be giving updates on local races. Hope you’ll tune in tonight.

President Bush trying to cut Amtrak funding again

The President’s proposed 2009 budget includes a cut in federal subsidies to Amtrak:

Taking Steps to Rationalize the Nation’s Intercity Passenger Rail System

  • Curtails Federal subsidies. $800 million for Amtrak, which represents a significant but necessary cut to the railroad’s Federal subsidy.
    • Requires that Amtrak control its operating losses and focus on services that offer the most promise.
    • Reserves the bulk of funds for capital investment so improvements may continue along the heavily trafficked Northeast Corridor.
    • Reflects that Amtrak has taken few steps to align its business with the traveling public’s demand for intercity rail service and that it consequently continues to hemorrhage taxpayer funds.
  • Provides State matching grants. $100 million for State matching grants for intercity passenger rail capital projects to empower States, not Amtrak, to address their transportation goals and priorities.

Bush tried to cut Amtrak funding last year, too, but Congress gave Amtrak $1.3 billion instead. It’s likely that Amtrak will get even more money this year. The U.S. Senate passed S.294 on Oct. 30, 2007, which gives Amtrak nearly $2 billion per year over the next six years and finally abandons the unrealistic notion that Amtrak can ever be self-sufficient. The Boston Globe has a good overview of the bill. It still needs to pass the House and get Bush’s signature. Hopefully it will pass with a veto-proof majority.

What? There are Republicans running for Senate?

Steve Sauerberg, M.D.Yes, yes there are. While all the drama has been on the 18th Congressional District and 92nd Legislative District races, there’s one race from which we’ve hardly heard a whisper: the U. S. Senate race. Dick Durbin’s latest six-year term is up, and he will have a Republican challenger. Three Chicago-area Republicans are running for the chance to face Durbin in November. They are Steve Sauerberg (pictured), Mike Psak, and Andy Martin.

The Chicago Daily Herald has a good rundown of their positions and vital statistics. They also endorse Sauerberg, albeit unenthusiastically. They complain that all the candidates are pretty weak (not to mention woefully underfunded), and will likely be slaughtered in the general election.

Sauerberg is also endorsed by the Chicago Tribune and the Peoria Journal Star.

City saving money at neighborhood expense

I got this e-mail tonight from the City:

Update as of 9:00 p.m.: City crews are currently plowing primary routes, and will in/out plow on secondary routes. With warming temperatures expected, and in order to conserve salt, crews will not plow/salt all residential streets. Snow fall rates vary throughout the city, therefore work will be limited.

I’m not crazy about this policy. I’ll withhold judgment for a couple days to see how it works out, but I’m concerned that this could potentially be treacherous for neighborhood streets. Yes, it’s forecasted to warm up tomorrow, but if the streets were plowed, that would mean that the sun would likely dry up the streets. Instead, the sun is going to melt or partially melt the snow cover on the streets, and then it’s going to freeze overnight the next night. That means the streets could be slick and uneven. Plus, what if the weather forecast is wrong? It’s been known to happen.

What do you think of this policy? Should the city be saving money by not plowing residential streets in anticipation of “warming temperatures”?

JammSammich tonight

JammSammich retro banner

Yep, that’s me on the left of this banner from over five years ago. The band started in 1998 with Brian Carroll singing lead, Mike Mercer on lead guitar, Matt Tomlianovich on bass, Doug Rendleman on drums, and me on the keyboard. Tonight, you’ll get to see that original lineup again, plus our early addition — Bill Trulove on the trumpet — for the whole first set. Then it’s on to all the other compositions of the band. The band has had three bass players, three keyboard players (I left in 2002), and four (I think) drummers. But one thing has always remained the same — the band and the fans always have a great time at every gig.

Tonight is a reunion show that will feature just about everyone who has ever played and/or sung with the band. We’ve been practicing for this performance for weeks, and it’s been a lot of fun playing music together again! I hope you can come out tonight and join the party. We’ll be at Crusen’s on War Memorial Drive, starting at 8:30 p.m.