Category Archives: Heart of Peoria Plan

Campaign for a Walkable West Bluff

Campaign for a Walkable West Bluff logoSometimes, like when the City Council is trying to shut down the Heart of Peoria Commission, you start to wonder if residents are still interested in the Heart of Peoria Plan, walkable neighborhoods, pedestrian-friendly streetscapes, and other facets of New Urbanism.

That’s why I was so excited to hear about this grassroots effort by West Bluff residents to create a Campaign for a Walkable West Bluff. They will be meeting tonight (March 18) at 6:30 p.m. in Bradley Hall, Room 142, if you’re interested in getting involved.

Here’s an article that was published in my neighborhood newsletter, written by those organizing this new campaign. It explains a little bit more about what they hope to achieve:

A group of neighbors and business owners in the West Bluff community are initiating a Campaign for a Walkable West Bluff, which we see as an effort to embrace “New Urbanism” as it pertains to quality of life in our neighborhoods. New Urbanism promotes walkable, neighborhood-based development as an alternative to sprawl. It is highlighted in DPZ’s Heart of Peoria (HOP) plan.

We believe that by creating a vibrant Main Street Corridor, we can also spur new mixed-use development, encourage the refurbishment of existing properties and even slow the speed of cars traveling through our neighborhoods. Improving our commercial district will potentially increase our property values, increase owner occupancy of our homes and help combat the perception that the West Bluff is unsafe.

We have met with Councilwoman Barbara Van Auken and she is enthusiastic about the possibilities such a partnership among neighbors presents. As our campaign takes shape, our intent is to collaborate with existing initiatives (West Bluff Council, Renaissance Park and Heart of Peoria Commissions) and events (Grand Tour of Homes, Moss Avenue Sale) to build community-wide support and make change happen. We may even organize a few walking, bus riding and biking events ourselves!

We are taking our cue in part from an excellent book we have discovered titled “The Great Neighborhood Book: A Do-it Yourself Guide to Placemaking” by Jay Walljasper, Senior Fellow at Project for Public Spaces (www.pps.org). This book is full of ideas for improving neighborhoods from communities across the country and the world. The recurring theme in this book is that ordinary people getting together and having fun is the best way to generate ideas and find solutions to common problems.

Our next meeting is set for March 18, 2008 at 6:30 pm in Bradley Hall, Room 142. We invite you to join us. We are interested in meeting with neighbors to answer questions and gather input.

“Long experience has shown us that bottom-up strategies work better than top-down approaches. The bottom-up strategy recognizes citizens as the experts, is guided by the wisdom of the community, and builds a strong partnership between the public and private sectors.” –Jay Walljasper, “The Great Neighborhood Book: A Do-it Yourself Guide to Placemaking.”

This campaign has also been profiled in the Journal Star and the Bradley Scout.

Sheridan Triangle renewal underway

Sheridan Triangle graphicA public meeting was held Wednesday night at Columbia Middle School to talk about streetscape and intersection improvements in the Sheridan-Loucks Triangle form-based code area. It’s a small stretch of Sheridan road, bounded by the south side of Hanssler on the north, and the north side of McClure on the south.

The process for making changes is outlined on this document that was distributed at the meeting. In addition to public meetings like the one Wednesday where anyone can give input, a Citizen Advisory Group (CAG) either has been or will be established that will include key stakeholders and presumably will require a greater time commitment (i.e., more meetings). I don’t know who is on the CAG, but I will try to find out. Currently, I know that no one from the Heart of Peoria Commission is on it, but perhaps there are plans to appoint someone.

If you can’t make it to the meetings, but would like to give some input, page two of the aforementioned document is a Community Context Audit Form. It needs to be returned by next Wednesday, March 12, which doesn’t give you a lot of time, but it will give you an opportunity to have your voice heard by the design team.

This project is not going to happen overnight. The timetable is spread out so that the final recommendation won’t come before the council until late September this year (tentatively). That may sound like a long time, but it’s only six months, and it will fly by quickly. The important thing is that progress is being made. Everyone’s hope and expectation is that this will be a successful implementation of the Heart of Peoria Plan, form-based codes, and public-private partnerships to revitalize an older area of town, and that it will be a model for the rest of the Heart of Peoria Plan area to follow.

I arrived at the meeting a little late Wednesday, but found the presentations and question and answer time very interesting. There were about 50 people in attendance, including District 150 Superintendent Ken Hinton, which I thought was notable. The best part was after the presentations when we got to interact one-on-one with the consultants and city staff. Throughout the gymnasium, there were several stations set up with maps, engineering drawings, artists’ renderings, etc., that explored different aspects of the planning process, including one station that had a computerized traffic simulation of the area.

I’m encouraged by what I’m seeing as this project moves forward.

Traffic consultant on Tuesday’s council agenda

I am so in the wrong line of work. I need to become a traffic consultant and get in good with IDOT.

The city wants to narrow Washington Street, add on-street parking, and widen the sidewalks as part of the effort to spur mixed use development in the Warehouse District. Now you might think that the city could just narrow the street, add on-street parking and widen the sidewalks, but you’d be wrong.

Why? Because Washington Street is a state route — Route 24, in fact. That means the Illinois Department of Transportation has to approve any changes, and they have procedures that require streets to always get wider and more pedestrian-hostile. So you can see what the city is up against.

One option is to move Route 24 to Adams and Jefferson streets, but then that causes other problems, such as the fact that Adams and Jefferson are one-way streets, and there’s a desire to convert them to two-way. If Route 24 moves there, then IDOT would have to approve the conversion there, so you’ve just traded one problem for another.

The good news is that there’s a process to try to change IDOT’s mind: Hire a consultant. For $525,000. Yes, a little more than a cool half a million. To put that in perspective, that’s like the equivalent of five assistant city managers.

First of all, don’t get me wrong. I’m glad that this process is moving forward — it shows that there’s a commitment to the plan for the Warehouse District. And secondly, you should know that Peoria doesn’t have to pay all of that — in fact, IDOT will pay $325,000 of the cost, and the council may decide to restrict the scope of the project so that it doesn’t exceed the IDOT-covered amount. So it might not cost Peoria anything (which makes you feel better until you realize that it’s just coming out of the taxes you pay to the state).

But still, whether a third or half a million, doesn’t that seem a bit crazy? Here we employ engineers at state and local levels. One would think they are more than capable of figuring out how to handle street drainage, or widen sidewalks, or change the painted lines from dotted white to double yellow. But in addition to the salary and benefits we pay for these engineers, we also need to pay over $300K to a consultant, and there’s no guarantee that his results will sway IDOT in the city’s favor.

Oh well, the important thing is that progress is being made… if the council passes the agenda item next Tuesday.

Council should also attend LDC training

I’ve got the date saved on my calendar: Saturday, January 26. That’s the day the city will be bringing in Lee Einsweiler from Code Studio in Austin, Texas, to do a refresher course on the city’s new Land Development Code that he helped create. John Sharp has an article about it in the paper today:

A meeting is scheduled for Jan. 26 to bring a variety of city officials together and train them on specifics of the LDC. Members of the city’s Zoning Board of Appeals, Zoning Commission, Planning Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, the Heart of Peoria Commission and Renaissance Park Commission will gather with city officials for a one-day training seminar focusing on hypothetical scenarios and decisions, using the LDC, that could emerge from them.

There’s only one crucial group missing here: the city council. I think all council members should also attend this session — especially the district council members from the first, second, and third districts. I’m hearing rumblings of more possible “exceptions” from not only the Land Development Code, but the form-based codes that were created for the Warehouse District, Sheridan-Loucks Triangle, Prospect Road Corridor, and Main Street Corridor. Not only are developers asking for exceptions, some council members are considering them.

If we make exceptions every time a developer comes and asks for it, then we’ve wasted a tremendous amount of time and money on these codes. Even if we get all the groups mentioned in Sharp’s article on board with the new codes, if the council compromises, it will be all for naught. That’s why I think it’s critical that they attend this training session.

Yes, I know they’re busy and already attend a lot of meetings. But this code affects 8,000 acres of Peoria. I think it’s important enough to warrant attendance by city decision-makers.

Capital dollars for the Heart of Peoria

Although the Heart of Peoria Commission is currently slated to receive no funding in the city’s proposed 2008 capital budget, that doesn’t mean the Heart of Peoria area is getting no funding for projects.

City Manager Randy Oliver sent me this breakdown of the funding that is currently proposed:

The Heart of Peoria area is proposed to receive a significant amount of the City’s proposed 2008 CIP non-discretionary resources. The major initiatives are:

  • Sheridan Road Triangle – $285,000
  • Warehouse District Infrastructure (Roads) – $1,000,000
  • Wisconsin Business Improvement District – $100,000
  • ML King Opportunity Acquisition – $100,000
  • Main Street Traffic Study – $35,000
  • Downtown Improvements – $200,000
  • Water Street – Hamilton to Washington – $1,000,000 (total funding $2 million balance from the State)
  • Center University of Illinois Medical School Campus – $2,000,000

This does not include Sidewalks in Need of Repair (SINR) or Special Assessment projects.

Although all these projects are in the HOP area, they are not all “Heart of Peoria Plan” projects. The U of I Medical School campus, for example, has nothing to do with the HOP Plan.

A significant amount of money is being put toward the Warehouse District, however, and that’s a good thing. Development of this project, though, is largely dependent on getting IDOT to go along with the vision and allow the city to make the kinds of street improvements needed to make it a viable mixed-use area. As Gary Sandberg recently pointed out, no one is going to want to live down there as long as the traffic is hostile to pedestrians.

I’m not sure what some of these projects are. Even after looking at the proposed budget on the city’s website, I can’t figure out what the $200,000 in “downtown improvements” is set aside to provide. I may have just missed the explanatory document requesting this funding — the budget is over 300 pages and it’s easy to overlook things.

UPDATE: Here’s what Mr. Oliver had to say about the “Downtown Improvements” funds:

Theses funds are a continuation of the funding for improvements to Water Street behind the Museum/CAT from a prior year project. A CIP sheet should have been included.

These improvements are required to be completed under a Development Agreement when the Museum/CAT Experience is completed. The improvement provides for a continuation of the street scape, diagonal parking on the Museum side of the block and elevating the street above the 100 year flood plain.

Council votes down Sheridan Road/Heart of Peoria improvements

UPDATE/CORRECTION 10/11/07: Below, I mistakenly cited the City of Peoria operating budget. In fact, the money in question was $200,000 from the capital budget set aside in 2007 for design and engineering of the Sheridan Loucks Triangle specifically and exclusively. $200,000 per year from 2007 to 2011 was requested, but only $200,000 in 2007 was funded. Sorry for the confusion, and thanks to my friend at the city who wishes to remain anonymous for pointing out my error.

In the 2007 City of Peoria budget (pp. 128-129), money was set aside for economic development. Here’s where some of that money was designated to go (emphasis mine):

2. Community Revitalization Activity – Activity cost $238,529

This program is responsible for undertaking projects which promote downtown Peoria and adjacent areas, including the Riverfront and residential neighborhoods, as an attractive location for working, living, and entertainment. Specific activities, to be undertaken, within the next five years, include:

  • Create and implement residential enterprise zone.
  • Identify and execute initiatives to revitalize the Warehouse District and Southern Gateway.
  • Finalize redevelopment plans for the former Sears block to create a cultural and entertainment destination for the Region.
  • Identify and redevelop blighted/contaminated property.
  • Continue revitalization initiatives in Council-directed areas (Sheridan Loucks, Prospect Road, Renaissance Park).
  • Undertake and complete public infrastructures improvements to support business and industry.

So, at tonight’s council meeting, Councilwoman Barbara Van Auken brought forth a motion to spend some of that money to enter into a contract with the Farnsworth Group, Inc. “for the DESIGN of the SHERIDAN TRIANGLE BUSINESS DISTRICT ENHANCEMENT from McCLURE AVENUE to HANSSLER PLACE, in an Amount Not to Exceed $183,750.00.” This is in the Sheridan Road form district that was created by the council back in May of this year.

In order for form districts to be successful, there are two things that need to take place. First, there needs to be a form-based code — a pre-planned area that provides a consistent and predictable development pattern. That’s the private investment side of the equation. Second, improvements need to be made to the streets and sidewalks in order to make it an attractive area both for redevelopment by investors and patronage by potential customers. That’s the public investment side of the equation.

Sheridan Master PlanPlans for improving the intersection and streetscape in this area were developed during a charrette hosted by Farrell-Madden Associates. You can see the results of that charrette by clicking on the picture to the right. You’ll notice the pictures show wider sidewalks, street trees, intersection changes, etc. The next step is to develop a project plan “splitting the area into logical phases for construction” with estimates and specifications for each phase. That’s what Councilwoman Van Auken asked for this evening.

But the council voted it down 6-5. Ardis, Turner, Gulley, Jacob, Montelongo, and Spears Spain voted against it. Van Auken, Sandberg, Manning, Spain Spears, and Nichting voted for it.

Why? I’m certain I don’t know. It appears they voted it down because it’s too close to the next budget cycle. Councilman Clyde Gulley kept talking about the Griswold Improvement Project — for which there is $0 in the 2007 budget — that the council voted against funding earlier this year because it would have been a budget amendment. He somehow thinks the two projects are analogous, and since the council voted down his street improvement project, he’s going to vote against everyone else’s. Other council members said we need to set priorities before spending that much money — as if they didn’t already set the priorities for 2007 in the 2007 budget.

So now, evidently the money set aside for improving the Heart of Peoria area this year will not get spent.

Pick a plan, any plan

Confused manThe city council on Tuesday tacitly approved Craig Hullinger’s request to pursue his plan to put townhouses and a street between the Riverplex and Spring Street near the river. (Councilman Sandberg voted against having Hullinger spend his time on that project because he would like to see other projects that we’ve already started come to fruition before efforts are divided to work on other projects. Councilman Spain countered that, if we wait until all the current projects are implemented, we won’t be coming up with any new ideas for a long time; he used the warehouse district as an example of a project that may take seven years or more to complete.)

I got a chance to talk to Hullinger yesterday before the council meeting, and one of the interesting things I learned (though I had heard of this anecdotally before) was how various city documents are not coordinated. Case in point: this area bordered by the train tracks and river, Spring Street and the Riverplex.

  • If you look at the Zoning Map for Peoria (updated 2005), you’ll see that this area is zoned R-3 (single-family residential) from Spring to Wayne, and C-2 (large-scale commercial) from Wayne to the interstate.
  • If you look at the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map (adopted 2001), it has the area from the interstate all the way to Morton Street (this area includes the Riverplex) designated as park land. From Morton to Spring, it’s designated as a mix of commercial and high-density residential.
  • If you look at the Heart of Peoria Plan (adopted “in principle” in 2002), it recommends the city “pursue development of a whitewater race course, utilizing available land to the north of the current recreational and fitness complex.” That would stretch from the Riverplex parking lot almost to Evans Street.

All of this leads me to conclude that the city needs someone somewhere to coordinate the many and various plans the city has adopted. I’m sure this isn’t the only part of town where plans conflict with each other. Who makes sure they’re in harmony? Which plan has precedence? Or are they all equal?

The city is currently in the middle of writing a new comprehensive plan. Hopefully these conflicts will be resolved during that process.

Cat wants traffic patterns unchanged downtown

One Way SignI meant to post this awhile ago and just never got around to it. One of the things the Heart of Peoria Commission is focusing on these days is fixing the streets. That doesn’t just mean filling potholes. It means making the streets more balanced thoroughfares — streets that comfortably accommodate not just cars, but also pedestrians, bicycles, and mass transit.

Downtown, there are a few street changes that the Commission would like to see and that the Heart of Peoria Plan advocates. In the Warehouse District, the Commission would like to see the Washington Street corridor improved by widening the sidewalks, allowing on-street parking, planting street trees, lowering the speed limit, and narrowing it from five lanes to three. IDOT put the kibosh on that plan, but there are efforts underway to change their mind. The Heart of Peoria Plan advocates changing Adams and Jefferson streets to allow two-way traffic again.

All of this talk about changing the streets downtown has led Caterpillar to publish their position, which can be summed up thus: status quo. They like things just the way they are, thank you very much. Here’s their full statement:

Caterpillar Inc. supports maintaining the existing traffic patterns on Adams, Jefferson, and Washington Streets in downtown Peoria (specifically one-way traffic on Adams and Jefferson, and two-way traffic on Washington).

We oppose any change that would reconfigure Adams Street or Jefferson Street for two-way traffic.

We oppose any change that would result in shifting heavy truck volume through downtown Peoria from Washington Street to other streets.

We believe that one-way traffic flow on Adams and Jefferson is smoother, less disruptive and consistent than would be the case if the streets were changed to two-way traffic. This is particularly true in front of our world headquarters on Adams Street. In order to properly host Caterpillar visitors, VIP vans, buses, and cars must be able to park conveniently and safely in front of our headquarters. Adams Street accommodates this activity effectively and safely in a multiple lane, one-way configuration.

Moreover, the image of Adams Street is a valuable component of the overall image conveyed by Caterpillar’s headquarters. We consistently receive positive comments from dealers, customers and visitors on the pleasant qualities of this area, and we attribute this ambience, in part, to the smooth, one-way traffic flow on Adams Street.

The current street routing in downtown Peoria, coupled with new and efficient links to Interstate 74, allows heavy trucks serving ADM and other industries to use Washington St. This pattern results in lower truck traffic volume on Adams and Jefferson through the most congested downtown areas.

The safety of Caterpillar employees is of the utmost importance. A key concern of our workers in downtown Peoria is pedestrian safety. In addition to our numerous buildings, Caterpillar employees occupy office space in many downtown office buildings and generate a large amount of pedestrian traffic during the typical business day. Changing streets from one-way to two-way
would create more vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at intersections. This would be especially true at the intersection of Adams Street and Main Street, which is traversed by hundreds of Caterpillar people daily. Although one of the busiest in downtown Peoria, it is easier to navigate because Adams Street is one-way. Our employees are familiar with the traffic patterns as they exist today
and know what to expect.

Caterpillar operates several parking lots for employees in downtown Peoria. In some cases the entrances and exits to these lots are located to accommodate current traffic patterns. For example, the exit from our parking lot in the 200 block of Northeast Adams allows for safe discharge in one direction on Adams Street, avoiding the safety issues associated with a left turn onto a two-way street.

We believe that any revisions to the current traffic patterns on Adams, Jefferson, and Washington Streets in the downtown Peoria area would be detrimental to our employees and visitors.

For a company that touts fact-based or measurement-based decision making (Six Sigma), this statement sure is full of a lot of conjecture. Who would have thought that the “pleasant qualities of this area” could be attributed to one-way streets? Or that cars and vans cannot park conveniently or safely in front of a business unless the street is one-way?

I agree that we don’t want heavy truck traffic diverted from Washington to Adams/Jefferson. Preferably, the truck traffic would be diverted instead to the Bob Michel bridge for I-74 access, bypassing the most congested part of downtown altogether.

But the paragraph about worker safety is the one that really takes the cake for me. “Our employees are familiar with the traffic patterns as they exist today and know what to expect.” So, if we were to change Adams to two-way, Caterpillar is telling us that their management employees — most if not all of whom have advanced degrees — will become confused or disoriented by the change, resulting in pedestrian accidents and casualties? If so, maybe traffic patterns outside shouldn’t be their biggest concern right now. Personally, I believe Cat employees are sharp enough to be able to navigate the crosswalk with little difficulty were traffic to change to two-way. I guess I just have high expectations.

The Cat lot in the 200 block of NE Adams is on the southeast side of the street, which means that traffic out of that lot can continue unchanged simply by making it a right-turn only exit, were the street to ever change to two-way.

Suffice it to say, I don’t find Cat’s objections compelling. I’d like to see them have an open mind as Councilman Sandberg works with them and other stakeholders regarding the possibilities for these downtown corridors (Washington, Adams, and Jefferson) and how they can be improved.

HOPC meeting to be continued Friday

The Heart of Peoria Commission last Friday started working on our proposed work plan for 2007-2008. We will be finishing our work plan at another special meeting this Friday at 8 a.m., in the conference room in the Planning & Growth department. The meeting is open to the public, as always.

So far, the commission has expressed interest in focusing on implementing New Urbanism principles in transportation and the public space, continuing to assist with the implementation of the Land Development Code and the four Form Districts, and developing marketing materials for the Heart of Peoria Plan area to generate interest in reinvestment. These are subject to change and/or further refinement at this Friday’s meeting.

When the work plan is completed, it will be submitted to the City Council for consideration during their July 24 meeting. They’ll decide at that time whether to keep and fund the commission, or decommission us.