City mechanics offer alternative plan to outsourcing manager position

The city’s mechanics are not happy with efforts to outsource their department. Who would be? No one wants to lose their job, especially when they’ve put down roots in a community and have been working for the city for a long time. But on the other side of the equation, you have a city that simply can’t afford to maintain such a large staff overall and needs to look for places to cut costs. It’s a no-win situation no matter how you look at it.

But now the mechanics are upset about something else. The current Fleet Services Manager is retiring, and the city doesn’t have a succession plan for that position. So, until they can hire a replacement, they need to have a manager for the interim. The city put the position out to bid instead of hiring from within. That prompted the mechanics to write this letter to Mayor Ardis:

Dear Mayor Ardis,

It has come to our attention that a bid has been sent out to take over the position of Fleet Services Manager. This is the position that Mr. Mike Caruso currently holds. We believe we have a more than qualified person to take his position on an interim basis until a permanent replacement is found. We believe Tom Satterfield is deserving of this position. Tom Satterfield has thirty years experience as a mechanic in the city garage. He has more than adequate experience to assume the position for three months until the subcontracting issue is resolved or a permanent person is hired.

It is our understanding that the city manager is in favor of paying an outside contractor approximately $27,000 to take over this position. An alternative plan was discussed in which Tom Satterfield would be made a super crew chief in which there would be a percentage added to his base pay. This increase to his pay in the same three month span would significantly save the taxpayers money. It is difficult for us to accept the idea of working for a manager fiom First Vehicle Service who is not here to benefit the garage or its dedicated employees. It appears as the old saying goes you are placing a “fox in the hen house”.

Since the issue of outsourcing was introduced to us in March, the employees and their families have been on a constant emotional roller coaster and much undeserved stress. We pride ourselves on being dedicated employees and taxpayers of Peoria. For example, the mechanics have had the opportunity to move out of the City of Peoria, instead we have chosen to raise our families in the City of Peoria. In fact, most of the mechanics live within five miles of the shop.

Issues such as the one we are discussing on Tuesday August 14,2007 beg us to ask ourselves this question. WHY? Why replace dedicated, long term, community-oriented taxpayers with “TOTAL STRANGERS”?

In closing we would especially like to thank Mr. Spain for taking the time to come to our garage and get a first hand look at what we are all about and to talk face to face with the employees who will be greatly affected by your decision. We would also like to thank the council members who have supported us through this very difficult issue and look forward to your continued support.

Sincerely,
City of Peoria Mechanics

Several of the city mechanics were at the meeting Tuesday night, ready to speak to this issue, but it was — surprise! — deferred for two weeks. During discussion, however, the city manager did address the mechanics’ letter. He stated that he was concerned that if you had one union position supervising other union positions, such a scenario would lack oversight controls. That statement elicited groans from the mechanics in attendance.

Other council members felt that it would be easier and cheaper to simply ask the current manager to stay on a few more months until a permanent replacement could be found.

4 thoughts on “City mechanics offer alternative plan to outsourcing manager position”

  1. Why is this becoming a must do issue at the 11th hour? Mike Caruso (spelling) is to retire at the end of August — was this a sudden surprise or has the administration known about this scenario since at least March of this year?

    Why are there repeated fire drill scenarios for COP events that seemingly can be handled in a more proactive manner?

  2. I think that there is more to this story…there has to be. The Fleet Manager’s retirement has been known for months now. I’m confident that the City Manager and Council have discussed various options for staffing the position prior to Tuesday evening either in individual conversations or even during an executive session.

    The biggest travesty that I see is that there is no succession planning in this department at all. When Steve VanWinkle leaves as Public Works Director there is no one qualified internally to take his positoin. When Gene Hewitt, the City Engineer, announced his retirement (which with any luck will be sooner rather than later), there is at best one individual capable of performing the job (at least at the low level Hewitt performed). Again no one able to step up to the plate.

    The Fleet Manager? No one qualified. The list can go on and on.

    The Public Works Director surrounded himself with “Yes” Men (and woman for that matter) rather than getting those with the best qualifications to do the job. None of them did a good job of developing their staff — in fact, most of them aren’t respected by their staffs.

Comments are closed.