D150 votes to use PBC funding for all building projects

The District 150 Board of Education met Monday night and voted unanimously to approve this agenda item:

10. REQUEST PUBLIC BUILDING COMMISSION OF PEORIA TO ISSUE BONDS FOR NEW LINCOLN SCHOOL – Cahill
Proposed Action: That the Board of Education approve and authorize the submission of a letter to the Public Building Commission of Peoria requesting a commitment to issue bonds for purposes of constructing a new primary school on the Lincoln School South site.

This is a departure from District 150’s original plan, which was to issue bonds for part of the building costs under their “Health-Life-Safety” (HLS) bonding authority. According to District Controller/Treasurer Guy Cahill, there are a number of reasons why they are now choosing to issue all the bonds through the Public Building Commission:

  • “Inaction on the state level” — Under the School Construction Grant Program, HLS dollars can be matched by the state. However, the grant program has not been funded for three years now, and doesn’t look likely to be funded in the near future.
  • “Greater flexibility in use” — Money from the PBC can be used for property acquisition; HLS money cannot.
  • “Limited amount of time” — The state authorized District 150 to access PBC funding for only five years. They have until 2011 to use it or lose it.
  • “Operation/maintenance dollars” — PBC funding can be used for ongoing maintenance of the buildings, including custodial/operational support.

Hear the school board’s deliberation of this item yourself:

[audio:http://www.peoriachronicle.com/wp-content/uploads/Audio/D150-BOE-07212008.mp3]

The school district still maintains that by limiting their borrowing to $85 million, they will not have to increase their property tax rate.

Also at the school board meeting Monday, Diane Vespa spoke to the board about the shortened Wednesday schedule the district is planning to institute this fall for primary schools. You can read a transcript of her comments on her blog.

3 thoughts on “D150 votes to use PBC funding for all building projects”

  1. Someone tell me how this works…. Do we get to vote on this on a referendum? Can one of the options be: Yes, when District 150 gives us back our educational time with the children.

  2. CJ: Sorry for soapboxing. The PBC bonding authority for D150 is courtesy of SB2477 delivered to our by our local legislators — Ret. Sen. Shadid, Rep. Schock and Leitch. Another financial boondoggle aka financial tourniquet. Back in Feb 2006 I was alarmed and in April 2006 when I met with Mr. Thornton of the PBC, (who was only willing to met with me at 7:00 am in the morning and he taperecorded the conversation), he assured me that this would not be the case for GOS replacement. HA HA HA HA is what I thought at the time and my prediction of D150 doing yet another endrun on the taxpayer unfortunately came true.

    So, where is the money coming from for the Math Science Academy rehab?

    Yes, let’s bond out for “ongoing maintenance of the buildings, including custodial/operational support.’ After all, it’s only taxpayer dollars.

    As for not increasing my tax rate — without additional bonding from the PBC, everyone’s tax bill would have decreased because the PBC debt was about to be retired for D150.

    Anyone want to calculate the increase in our property tax bill for $85 million in PBC bonding for new schools?

    HA — if the tax rate does stay the same —- our tax bills will be HIGHER!

    CJ: Have you done any of those calculations yet?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.