Mayoral candidate opposes high school closing

Parents and teachers gathered at Godfather’s Pizza again Sunday night to further discuss ways to keep Central and Woodruff high schools from being closed. General Parker, candidate for Mayor of Peoria, assured those in attendance that he will “stand behind [them] all the way”:

[flashvideo filename=http://peoriachronicle.com/wp-content/uploads/Video/WHS-Protest-01252009.flv /]

Parker distributed copies of a summary report from the House Appropriations Committee on the proposed stimulus package known officially as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Bill of 2009. The summary stated that a large amount of funding will be going toward education:

Education for the 21st Century: To enable more children to learn in 21st century classrooms, labs, and libraries to help our kids compete with any worker in the world, this package provides:

  • $41 billion to local school districts through Title I ($13 billion), IDEA ($13 billion), a new School Modernization and Repair Program ($14 billion), and the Education Technology program ($1 billion).
  • $79 billion in state fiscal relief to prevent cutbacks to key services, including $39 billion to local school districts and public colleges and universities distributed through existing state and federal formulas, $15 billion to states as bonus grants as a reward for meeting key performance measures, and $25 billion to states for other high priority needs such as public safety and other critical services, which may include education.

Parker emphasized that last bullet point, implying the closing of a high school would qualify as a “[cutback] to key services.” Thus, he encouraged everyone to write their senators and congressmen asking them to pass the stimulus bill, and then ask their school board representatives to pursue some of that stimulus money to help them through these tough economic times instead of closing schools.

Parker also criticized city employees — especially [acknowledged that many city employees, including] our “most highly paid city workers,” such as police officers and firefighters — who don’t live in Peoria. By living outside the city, the school district loses revenue that would come from their property tax dollars, he said. [Parker states in the comments section of this post that another quote from last night better summarizes his feelings about this: “We need to make District 150 the best school district in the area to make the firefighters and police want to move back into the district.”]

Others who spoke at the meeting questioned whether the school district’s plan to redraw attendance area boundary lines is legal. In the state’s school code, there is a section (105 ILCS 5/10?21.3) also known as the Armstrong Act. It says the school board has the duty:

To establish one or more attendance units within the district. As soon as practicable, and from time to time thereafter, the board shall change or revise existing units or create new units in a manner which will take into consideration the prevention of segregation [emphasis added] and the elimination of separation of children in public schools because of color, race or nationality. All records pertaining to the creation, alteration or revision of attendance units shall be open to the public.

The argument is that Peoria’s schools would become more segregated if Hines and Von Steuben students are sent to Richwoods, as is currently proposed, and that is illegal under the school code. A legal opinion on the matter is being sought.

Several people opposed to the school closings are also getting together to go over (1) Treasurer Guy Cahill’s deficit projections to verify their accuracy, and (2) the district’s budget to see what other cuts could be made instead of closing a high school.

56 thoughts on “Mayoral candidate opposes high school closing”

  1. I am a parent with 2 children currently attending Hines and until this school year started I really had no complaints about how it was being run or the information the Principal was giving parents. But since school has started the moral with the teachers and administrators at Hines has been really low in part to what most of us parents have figured out that the teachers and administrators have know about what the District plans on doing to our school for some time. When were we, the parents and taxpayers of the Hines/Von Steuben area going to find this out. When the District has already made its decision to change how these 2 schools function. As of right now I don’t know of any parent meetings at our school so that concerned parents can ask questions and possible get answers from our Principal. I do realize that our Principals hands are somewhat tied but at least our Principal could go to bat for our school at a school board meeting with the backing of the parents of Hines school.

  2. AliceinPeorialand:

    Your principal is one of the best. Just remember, she and others are functioning under fear and intimidation.

  3. “she and others are functioning under fear and intimidation.”

    Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave!

    You gotta love this country!

  4. Alice’s: “most of us parents have figured out that the teachers and administrators have know about what the District plans on doing to our school for some time. ”
    Where did you get the idea that principals and, especially teachers, knew anything at all about this plan? Even the PHS and WHS principals didn’t know about closing their schools until they heard it on the news. If the teachers had known earlier, they would have started protesting earlier as they did at the last board meeting. I doubt that even board members knew about the plan much before it hit the press–as for the central administration, they are in the habit of making hasty, last-minute decisions.

  5. “like in the good ole days ”

    You ran the same risk back then. There is no significant increase in the crime rate in the last 100 years. More people, more crime. But in Peoria.. same number of people, same crime rate.

    Look at the crime statistics for Peoria… ZERO rapes in 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, or 2006…

    hmmmmmmmm… so much for conventional wisdom, eh?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.