Park board should take a look in the mirror

Kellar Branch RailroadJournal Star reporter and columnist Terry Bibo reports today that the Peoria Park Board is flummoxed as to why their plans to convert the Kellar Branch rail line to a trail isn’t moving forward. While they have traditionally pointed fingers at everyone from Pioneer Railcorp to the Surface Transportation Board, they have a new target now: the City of Peoria.

“That sounds like either the city is asleep or the city is in bed with that concept,” said Vice President Jim Cummings.

“That’s an interesting observation,” said President Tim Cassidy.

Oh sure, it’s the city’s fault now. They who have consistently voted in favor of the trail. They who have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on legal counsel to try to get regulatory approval to build the trail. They who signed a 99-year lease at $1 per year with the Park District to use the land for a trail. They’re the ones holding things up, the Park Board says.

I wish. It would be a beautiful thing if the City finally decided to keep the rail line and canceled its contract with the Park District. But I don’t foresee that happening.

If the Park District is looking for someone to blame, it should take a good look at itself. Their all-or-nothing stance on this issue is the obstacle that is standing in the way. If they would try to find a way to build the trail around the rail line, they could have the thing built in a couple of years.

All they need to do is put the trail on the railroad right-of-way next to the tracks where feasible, and then move it adjacent to a parallel street where necessary. It can be done, and they can find grant money to do it, by modifying their ISTEA grant (which they’ve done once already) and/or getting IDNR grants (like they have for the rest of the trail line).

I think I’ve figured out the reason they’re so hard-nosed on this issue, though. The Journal Star article mentions that the Park District is moving their administrative offices to the former IDOT building at Knoxville and Prospect, which is right on the Kellar line. My guess is they want to have the trail going right by their new administrative offices, and that’s the real reason why they’re so unwilling to compromise.

Schock to officially announce candidacy Saturday

I just got a notice in the mail today that says:

Grab a ticket on the Schock Express

Representative Aaron Schock’s Official 18th Congressional District Campaign Announcement

Date: 27-Oct-2007
Class: First
Ticket Type: One-Way to Victory

To:
10:00–Hamilton’s–100 Northeast, Jacksonville
12:30–Hilton Hotel–700 East Adams St., Springfield
3:30–Peoria Heights Village Hall–4901 N. Prospect Rd., Peoria Heights

On the back is a letter from Rep. Schock:

Dear Republicans:

Please join us at my official announcement and campaign kickoff rally for Congress. It will be a festive and free event with everyone invited–the more the merrier!

I will express why I am running and lay out my vision for our country, stands on the issues and what I intend to do as your next Congressman. It will mean a lot to have Republicans like you there to hear what I have to say and help me launch this campaign as I take my message to the voters.

It will be a fun, old-fashioned political rally that I hope you will be a part of. Your support means a great deal to me and will be a boost towards winning this race. You are essential to my success. I hope you can join us at one of the stops!

Respectfully,
Aaron Schock

I was beginning to wonder why he hadn’t officially announced yet.

City agrees to cancel tickets

The City of Peoria held a press conference yesterday at Peoria Police headquarters to announce that tickets given to high school students at Manual and Woodruff for walking in the middle of the roadway and/or jaywalking will be abated if the students attend mandatory school assemblies where police officers and school officials will try to give students a “better understanding of the rules.”

Police Chief Steve Settingsgaard stood by his officers, again reiterating that they acted appropriately, even though that’s disputed by local African American leaders. However, he felt the need to “move beyond that disagreement” and recognize that the city, school board, and African American leaders such as local NAACP president Don Jackson all “wanted to get to the same place,” i.e., a safer environment for the children and the motoring public. “We can get there through this assembly process,” he said.

The assembly process should be completed before Thanksgiving.

Don Jackson stated on behalf of the NAACP, “we enthusiastically support this resolution.” Rev. Harvey Burnette, who had previously asked that the tickets be reduced to warnings, was pleased with the outcome. Dr. Rita Ali of the King Holiday Committee also spoke in favor of the resolution.

The agreement was reached during a meeting that included representatives of the city, police, school district, NAACP, King Holiday Committee, and pastors. These groups will continue to meet to improve “community/police relations.”

My two cents: Message received. Tickets can be adjudicated in the court of public opinion. Fines can be wiped away if enough public pressure and, most importantly, the race card are applied. No need to go through established processes.

I realize racism exists and is a problem in this community. One need look no further than the Journal Star website’s comments section to see it on display every day. But these tickets had nothing to do with racism. They had everything to do with children walking in the middle of the street, obstructing motorists, and intimidating drivers.

Yes, in one case, there was an eyewitness who said the children she saw were not walking in the middle of the street. But wouldn’t it have been better to have that come out in court? To have the police and the eyewitness testify and let a judge make a determination? Then it’s on the record, and steps can be taken to rectify that situation through established processes. Isn’t that the reason those systems were established in the first place?

Instead, these children plus all the other students who were ticketed — meaning all those whose culpability was never disputed — get off scot-free. What message does that send?

It sends the message that playing the victim and accusing police of racism works. It sends the message that African Americans evidently can’t get a fair hearing in a court of law, so their hearing needs to be held in the court of public opinion instead. It sends the message that African Americans and the police are enemies who need some sort of arbitrator in the form of a “community/police relations” committee.

It sends the wrong message. It doesn’t teach the students personal responsibility for their actions. And it does nothing to battle real racism.

One post-script: the police chief did say that “there will be enforcement in the future.” Hopefully that future enforcement will be supported by all community leaders so we can get back to dealing with the real problem in this particular case: children walking in the middle of streets.

FCC chief’s proposal would lead to more media consolidation

I was disturbed to read this article in Broadcast Engineering magazine:

FCC chairman Kevin Martin is promoting an ambitious plan that would dramatically relax the nation’s media ownership rules by year end.

Martin wants the FCC to repeal a rule that forbids a company to own both a newspaper and a television or radio station in the same city. He also wants to ease restrictions on the number of radio and TV stations a company could own in the same city.

That doesn’t sound like a good idea. Imagine hypothetically if Gatehouse Media owned not only all the newspapers in central Illinois, but a TV station in each market as well. That scenario is not so hypothetical in larger cities like Chicago. Sam Zell is buying the Tribune Company, which includes the Chicago Tribune and television station WGN. They have a waiver right now that allows them to own both, but that waiver doesn’t transfer to a new owner. Thus, Sam Zell would be among the big winners of the proposed rule changes, according to several news reports. Media mogul Rupert Murdoch would be another winner, as he would be able to own The New York Post and television station WNYW, reports Broadcast Engineering.

Illinois Senator Barack Obama doesn’t like the idea. But his complaint is not so much about media consolidation per se, but rather the harm it would do to minority media ownership:

Obama, in a letter sent Monday to FCC Chairman Kevin Martin criticized the agency’s record in promoting minority ownership in media companies and asked him to reconsider his proposed timeline.

We need more diversity in the media, but it goes beyond mere racial or gender diversity. We need more diversity of opinion. The last time the FCC tried to pass similar rules changes in 2003, Linda Foley, president of the Newspaper Guild, said, “The biggest impact [of media consolidation] is that we would have fewer and fewer people on the local level deciding what the news agenda is.” We’ve seen that here in Peoria already, as there are fewer reporters overall at area newspapers now that Gatehouse Media has bought and consolidated many of them. That means they can’t cover as much news, and more things go unreported and uninvestigated.

The non-profit advocacy group Common Cause has started a campaign against the new rules.

Council Roundup: 4 a.m. liquor licenses

At-large councilman Eric Turner moved to extend 4 a.m. liquor licenses for a one-year trial period to only two businesses — Club Apollo and Club Excalibur — rather than an area of downtown as was proposed by other council members and the police department. Second district councilwoman Barbara Van Auken moved to divide the question — that is, to vote on each location separately.

Extending a 4 a.m. license to the Club Apollo location passed with 9 ayes, 1 nay (Sandberg), and 1 abstention (Jacob). The Club Excalibur location, however, failed with only 2 ayes (Gulley, Turner), 8 nays, and 1 abstention (Jacob).

One interesting point: City attorney Randy Ray mentioned that extending the 4 a.m. license to a satellite location is only legal because it’s a temporary one-year trial. If the council decides that this works, they will have to create a district to make it permanent.

Council Roundup: ArtsPartners to get funding

On another 10-1 vote tonight, the City Council approved funding ArtsPartners from collected Restaurant tax receipts capped at $75,000 per year for the next four years (until 2011). At-large councilman Ryan Spain sang the praises of ArtsPartners, even mirroring the language of ArtsPartners Executive Director Suzette Boulais’ prepared speech. Third district councilman Bob Manning was more circumspect in his comments, praising not so much ArtsPartners, but the process of questioning and publicly vetting this item instead of simply rubber-stamping it.

The only “no” vote was Gary Sandberg who said he was voting against it because of the source of the funds (“R” portion of the HRA taxes). Those funds were supposed to go toward paying off the debt on the Civic Center, he said, and now we’re using those funds for other things. He believes that that city is breaking its word by redirecting those funds.

Council Roundup: Gateway Building

The City of Peoria will pursue possibly selling or leasing the Gateway Building. The City Council voted 10-1 to issue a request for proposals to that end. According to the council communication, city staff will now:

…solicit proposals and once received will assemble a committee consisting of representatives from the Legal, Economic Development, Public Works and City Manager’s Office who will then review the RFPs and evaluate on the following criteria:

  1. Proposals that do not require public contribution or incentives (15%)
  2. Price for the property (20%)
  3. Proposers ability to agree to the continued use of public restrooms (15%)
  4. Proposals that continue the public access to the Riverfront (15%)
  5. Proposals that generate pedestrian traffic on the Riverfront (15%)
  6. Highest and Best Use (20%)

Although at-large councilman Eric Turner vehemently opposed the idea of selling the Gateway building during his interview on WCBU’s Outside the Horseshoe program, during the council meeting he weakly countered that “not everything government does is intended to make a profit; some of it is quality-of-life,” yet simultaneously said he would support the motion.

First district councilman Clyde Gulley was the lone “no” vote. He thought the council should decide on a price before sending out an RFP. Leaving it vague, he believed, could potentially waste a lot of time on the part of city staff and those making proposals.