Hi everyone! Sorry I’m late tonight. However, you didn’t really miss anything. So far, everything has been sailing through the council with no opposition. The mayor and all council members are here except for George Jacob.
ITEM NO. 1 CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS BY OMNIBUS VOTE, for the City of Peoria, with Recommendations as Outlined:
A. NOTICE OF LAWSUIT on Behalf of LORRAINE SEPHUS Regarding a Claim Involving an Accident on October 2, 2009, which Occurred at the Intersection of Griswold and Antoinette Avenues, with Recommendation to Refer to the Legal Department.
B. Communication from the City Manager and Director of Public Works Requesting Approval of N. E. FINCH COMPANY and CARRI SCHARF TRUCKING as VENDORS for TRACTION SAND to MIX with ROCK SALT, as Outlined.
C. Communication from the City Manager and Assistant Director of Planning and Growth Management Requesting Approval of a SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT to the CITY OF PEORIA’S HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION and RAPID RE-HOUSING PROGRAM (HPRP) Expanding the UTILITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM and? ADDING a RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, and with a Request to AMEND the EXISTING AGREEMENTS, as Outlined.
D. Communication from the City Manager and Assistant Director of Planning and Growth Management Requesting Approval of the 2011 ANNUAL PLAN for SUBMISSION to the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of HOUSING and URBAN DEVELOPMENT.
E. Communication from the City Manager and Director of Public Works Requesting Approval of the PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT with TERRA ENGINEERING, LTD., in an Amount Not to Exceed $58,825.19, for Preliminary Engineering Services for the GLEN AVENUE and UNIVERSITY STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT.
F. Communication from the City Manager and Assistant Director of Planning and Growth Management with Recommendation from the Planning Commission and Staff to Approve a RESOLUTION Amending the CITY OF PEORIA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and FUTURE LAND USE PLAN (Map) to Change the Future Land Use Designation of Property Currently Designated High Density Residential to a Medium Density Residential Designation for Property Located at 824 W. MOSS AVENUE (Parcels 18-08-226-015 and 18-08-226-016).
G. Communication from the City Manager and Assistant Director of Planning and Growth Management with Recommendation from the Zoning Commission and Staff to Adopt an ORDINANCE Rezoning Property Located at 824 W. MOSS AVENUE from the Present Class R-6 (Multi-Family Residential) District to a Class R-1 (Single Family Residential) District.
H. Communication from the City Manager and Director of Public Works with Recommendation from the Board of Local Improvements to Adopt an ORDINANCE Providing for the NORTH EASTON PLACE (from North Gale Avenue to West Forrest Hill Avenue) SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, the Net Length of 1,017 Feet or 0.19 Mile.
I. Communication from the City Manager and Finance Director/Comptroller Requesting Adoption of an ORDINANCE Amending the CITY OF PEORIA BUDGET for FY 2010 Relating to the USE of NORTHSIDE RIVERFRONT TIF FUNDS, in the Amount of $15,000.00, to CONDUCT ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS of CITY-OWNED PROPERTY Along the ILLINOIS RIVER.
J. Communication from the City Manager and Assistant Director of Planning and Growth Management Regarding the GLEN OAK IMPACT ZONE 2011 ACTION PLAN, with Request to Receive and File. (Refer to Item No. 10-373)
K. Communication from the City Manager and Finance Director/Comptroller Regarding the CITY OF PEORIA FIREFIGHTER’S PENSION FUND and the CITY OF PEORIA POLICE PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL REPORTS as of JANUARY 1, 2010, with Request to Receive and File.
L. APPOINTMENT by Mayor Jim Ardis to the SPRINGDALE CEMETERY MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY, with Request to Concur:
James E. Glazebrook (Voting) – Term Expires 6/30/2013
M. REPORT of CITY TREASURER PATRICK A. NICHTING for the MONTH of SEPTEMBER 2010, with Request to Receive and File.
N. PEORIA PUBLIC LIBRARY FINANCIAL AND STATISTICAL REPORT for Period Ending SEPTEMBER 30, 2010, with Request to Receive and File.
Riggenbach removed Item J just to sing its praises, and Gulley abstained from Item C due to being on the board of the organization. Other than that, everything passed unanimously.
ITEM NO. 2 Communication from the City Manager and Assistant Director of Planning and Growth Management with Recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commission to Adopt an ORDINANCE Approving the DESIGNATION of 1412 N. E. PERRY AVENUE, as a LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK.
Passed unanimously.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(10-057) Communication from the City Manager and Assistant Director of Planning and Growth Management with Request to DEFER the ORDINANCE Amending CHAPTER 16 of the Code of the City of Peoria Related to the HISTORIC DESIGNATION PROCESS until the DECEMBER 14, 2010, REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
Changed to a deferral until second meeting in January 2011. Passed unanimously.
(10-391) Communication from the City Manager and Assistant Director of Planning and Growth Management with Request to Adopt a REVISED ORDINANCE Amending APPENDIX B of the Code of the City of Peoria Relating to WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES, with a Request to Receive and File the SUPPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. (Revised Ordinance)
Passed unanimously.
(10-458) Communication from the City Manager and Director of Public Works Requesting Approval of the PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT with HANSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., in an Amount Not to Exceed $950,000.00, for PHASE I ENGINEERING SERVICES for WASHINGTON STREET Between I-74 and MacARTHUR HIGHWAY. (New Communication and New Agreement)
Spears is giving a PowerPoint presentation on why this project is so important. He’s talking about the importance of “pedestrian-focused intimate setting[s],” “walkable streets,” urban living options, “safe and active shopping,” etc. He’s preaching to the choir here at the Chronicle. He’s talking about the importance of places being open after 6:00 because that’s when the majority of consumer spending happens. (Funny, that didn’t seem to be a concern when they were approving the museum block, which will close before 6.)
He says the designer is also working on the project in East Peoria, adding “across the river is our competition.” He also says the designer they want to hire is his brother-in-law (he also says this is not a conflict of interest — he checked with legal). He says this is “more than the Duany plan — it’s about economics.” (I’m not sure what that means exactly.) End of presentation.
Sandberg has a question about the scope of the design work — does it end at MacArthur or Edmund Street? Public Works Director Barber says the design work only goes to MacArthur, except that they will look at the intersection, which could impact the next block between MacArthur and Edmund. However, the streetscape and pedestrian-friendliness will stop at MacArthur. On the northern end, the streetscape work will effectively end at Hamilton Blvd., not I-74. Sandberg further points out that there’s not enough money available to complete Phase I at this time, which Barber verifies. Sandberg says, “We’re starting a process that isn’t fully funded” and “doesn’t include all the vision of a new Warehouse District.” Sandberg would like to see it be fully funded.
Spain says he agrees with Sandberg, but wants to “use available dollars” to get the project started. He says we can still do a lot with the dollars we have, even though we can’t do everything we want right now.
Mayor Ardis says he’s supporting the motion despite some reservations. Spears says once we have the right development in there, “we won’t have to worry about the dollars and cents” because the development will grow from one neighborhood to the next.
Motion passes 9-1 (Spears voting nay). I was distracted at the beginning of the presentation — why did Spears vote “nay”? I’ll try to get some clarification…. (Update: I’ve asked around, and others are also confused.)
(10-464) Communication from the City Manager Requesting for the City Council to Provide Direction to the Administration on the PRELIMINARY FY 2011 OPERATING BUDGET.
City Manager Scott Moore is giving a presentation on the budget. The elimination of 11 police officers, 15 firefighters, and three Public Works employees are still in the City Manager’s recommendation. The floor is now open for discussion.
Turner asks about parking enforcement officers (why cut them when they’re revenue generators?). Van Auken starts to ask questions about fees, but they are part of the next agenda item. All the council members are referring to a handout that I do not have and is apparently not posted with the agenda on the City’s website. Sandberg is now asking some questions about the use of TIF funds to pay for certain personnel. Apparently, one of the suggestions is to reimburse Economic Development salaries from TIF funds. Sandberg says “that’s like eating your own arm that’s trying to feed yourself.” He also complains that taking things out of next year’s budget and putting them in the following year’s budget artificially inflates the following year’s budget deficit.
Van Auken asks City Manager about the possibility of outsourcing Economic Development to, say, the EDC. Moore has a handout on that issue to which he directs Van Auken. Van Auken asks some follow-up questions, and Moore doesn’t really have an answer for them. Van Auken wants to know how much of the $360,000+ for Economic Development can be saved by partnering with EDC, and what it will take to get those numbers. Moore says he needs council direction on which operations they want to outsource. Van Auken says she wants the manager to come back with options, even the possibility of getting rid of the department completely. She doesn’t want the council to have to micromanage this effort, but have the manager step up and offer suggestions. Riggenbach says the same thing as Van Auken. Says not to limit himself to the EDC, but also consider ways we can partner with the County. Gulley says he’s uncomfortable talking about eliminating the department, but concurs that he would like to see options from the City Manager. Turner speaks in favor of Economic Development — it’s “vitally, vitally important,” he says. Business recruitment, retaining business, etc., are important activities for which we need a front-line person.
Montelongo asks if there are any assets we could sell off. [Ha! How about the $10 million Sears block they just gave away for a buck?!] Susan Schlupp says there are several vacant lots and some larger properties in Southtown they are trying to sell. Mayor Ardis, without actually saying it, basically says that public safety positions are more important than Economic Development positions. He also says that Economic Development isn’t doing much because they don’t have a department head.
Spain compliments the Mayor, then refers to the 10/29 Issues Update and asks about possible further reductions to training and travel. Moore says these line items have been cut every year. The amount we’re spending on travel/training per employee is only about $350. To cut it more, some departments would just have to cut travel/training completely. Spain compliments staff for their work in cutting this area. Now he asks about the report back regarding publications — are there ways we can use technology to reduce publication costs? Answer: more information to come after more discussions with staff. Next, he asks about internet-based payroll. Director Scroggins says they’re investigating it; apparently they had a meeting set up with a provider, but the rep had to cancel so the meeting was rescheduled.
[I have the new budget handouts now, thanks to Tanya Koonce from WCBU — Thanks, Tanya!]
Irving asks some questions for clarification, then states that in the private sector, during tough times, travel and training go way down. He acknowledges the cuts that have been made, but says they need to be reduced even more. Van Auken harps on travel and training as well, saying it needs to be looked at on a department-by-department basis because “some departments have done better than others” at cutting travel. She also seems to think that some staff members are passing up opportunities to get training in town, then taking the training out of town at greater cost to the City.
More questions for which there are no answers…. Ardis asks for motion to receive and file, and a request for the City Manager to bring back a plan next meeting to close the remaining budget gap.
Sandberg asks that all the departments’ information be presented in the same format. Apparently, Public Works’ information was not presented the same way as the other departments. Montelongo still wants to see what assets the City has that could possibly be sold.
Spain/Gulley move to close discussion and receive and file. Motion passes unanimously.
(10-465) Communication from the City Manager Requesting Direction to Staff Regarding POTENTIAL INCREASES to VARIOUS FEES and FINES.
Van Auken moves to accept fees/fines as recommended with the exception of historic designation and historic landmark designation fees; seconded by Turner. Motion passes 9-1 (Sandberg voting nay).
PUBLIC COMMENTS Regarding the FY 2011 CITY OF PEORIA BUDGET.
No one has any comments.
NEW BUSINESS
Ryan Spain thanks Councilman Jacob for the Nancy Brinker books he gave to each member of the council. Apparently, he bought the books in March (before his accident), but they were just delivered today.
PRESENTATION
ITEM NO. 1 PRESENTATION by ILLINOIS AMERICAN WATER COMPANY Regarding INVESTMENT at THEIR PLANT.
Short presentation with much technical talk not completely into the microphone.
PETITIONS, REMONSTRANCES & COMMUNICATIONS TOWN OF THE CITY OF PEORIA
ITEM NO. 1 Communication from the Town Officials Budget Committee Requesting Approval of the PROPOSED ESTIMATED TAX LEVY of $2,179,219.00 With an ESTIMATED TAX RATE of .13663 for the Town of the City of Peoria and Requesting to Enter This Action into the Permanent Record.
Trustee Irving says he accidentally threw his paper away. Joe Whalen has an extra copy he hurries to give Irving. Irving makes motion to approve the same levy amount as 2009/seconded by Sandberg. Motion passes unanimously.
ITEM NO. 2 TOWN OF THE CITY OF PEORIA FINANCIAL REPORT for Period Ending 9/30/2010, with Request to Receive and File.
Motion to approve by Irving/Spain. No discussion. Passes unanimously.
CITIZEN REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL
Savino Sierra is the only one. He complains about deteriorating sidewalks around schools.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
There is an executive session (poor souls, it’s already 8:58 p.m.), but the rest of us get to go home. Or, in my case, over to the Bullpen (in Landmark) for a late supper. Come on by and hang out if you want. Goodnight, all!
Wow, it is nice to see Spears so interested in “streetscape”. Where was Councilman Spears during the years the Heart of Peoria Commission was working to initiate the Heart of Peoria Plan? Let me tell you he was missing in action and not on the front lines. He was not someone we considered to be our ally.
For the record, in contrast to the way Spears describes Duany, Andres Duany is the gold standard of urban design- we were more than lucky to get him to pay attention to our city. His derogatory comments about the current planning initiatives are evidence of his lack of knowledge- I suppose ignorance is bliss. I would like Councilman Spears to explain why he is now so interested in the “streetscape” of Peoria and how that squares with the pitiful nature of the fourth district. Furthermore his blatant promotion of his brother in law is absolutely a conflict of interest. We need a new city council now more than ever.
And I’m adding Beth Akeson to the list of people who probably going to run for Peoria City Council.
Glen & University? AGAIN?? There’s a butt load of fiber-optic there. Hope they notify the stake-holders.
It appears based solely on the information here that Spears voted nay to approving the contract with Hanson because he was advocating instead for his brother-in-law’s firm.
Spears should have recused himself simply because of the appearance of lack of independence.
I had to laugh when the spolighted the developer D. JOSEPH COMPANIES
The same people that have the Midtown Plaza falure. But hey they did not even get a question as to that strip mall. I guess the COP seems that Midtown is doing just fine for the city coffers.
nevermind
hotel news?
http://www.pjstar.com/news/x1226107738/Carnegies-Restaurant-closed-until-further-notice
Thanks Paul
I suspect the Pere is bleeding red ink and did this to reduce costs.
I also suspect that if they do not get purchased soon, bankruptcy is in their future. Just a guess.
Has anyone done a study of the success or failure of the traffic patterns on Main Street? I believe that the right turn lane onto University is a failure. I seldom see any cars turning right. Several times I have been in a line of cars backed up almost to Farmington Road but 0-2 in the turn lane. I think the right turn lanes coming up Main Street are confusing, also–especially, since there is no turn lane at Main and University–drivers get in the habit of avoiding the turn lane and then end up in the wrong lane at University.
A study of the success or failure of the traffic patterns on Main Street!?!
Sounds interesting Sharon, but I don’t think Peoria can afford ANOTHER multi-million dollar study right now…. Ha.
No need. Just go and look at the skid marks at Main and University where people who are in the east bound Main right turn only lane decide they need to be over so they just move over, thus creating the skid marks from unsuspecting motorists, the ones that can read signs and notice markings on the street.
Emtronics,
As much as you complain about the new traffic configuration, I don’t recall seeing you at any of the meetings (that were open to the public) concerning this. If you didn’t want to be part of the process, then don’t complain now.
Emtronics, consider yourself reprimanded. I have found that going to meetings to complain doesn’t always make much difference. Also, the traffic pattern coming up Main Street isn’t much better. Drivers, myself included, come up the hill in the right lane and all of a sudden they find themselves in a turn lane. Then they get to University and find that there is no turn lane.
There is a turn lane for University just after you cross the intersection of Bourland and Main.
Yes, you can turn from Main onto University, but it isn’t a turn lane (unlike the stop light at Sheridan and Bourland)–drivers can go straight or turn right at University.
“Then they get to University and find that there is no turn lane.” This is exactly what you said You said there is no turn lane. You didn’t say that there was no turn only lane. The lanes on Main at University heading west are the same as they were before the re-configuration. So what is it specifically you want?
to complain? ignore reason? long for the past? nit-pick? something along those lines? 🙂
I thought a “turn lane” was the same as saying “turn only–don’t go straight.” I didn’t realize that every right lane was called a “turn lane.” That means that every corner has a turn lane, right? Coming home from church on Sunday I used to stay in the right lane all the way up Main Street and around the curve on Western. Now I can’t get in the right lane until after Bourland. I have seen some drivers who end up in the wrong lane and go straight instead of turning at Sheridan or Bourland.
I’m getting used to the traffic pattern, but I don’t see the point in the change. I assume it was to allow parking on Main Street. So far that doesn’t seem to have caught on. However, I don’t feel strongly enough about the change to do more than comment here. My guess is that after events at Bradley traffic gets rather congested with all cars having to move into the left lane going down Main Street.
Getting back to an earlier question, yes, after talking to some other people, “nontimendum” is correct: Spears wanted the Council to hire his brother-in-law from Colorado for the project instead of a local engineering firm. It was confusing at the time of the meeting because he wasn’t really very clear on what he wanted the Council to do. It sounded like he was just giving a presentation on the importance of the project, but there was no real “call to action,” if you will. Suffice it to say, it was not a very good or persuasive presentation, and despite his protestations to the contrary, it reeks of conflict-of-interest considering the firm he was stumping for was his brother-in-law’s.
I’m not understanding what all the confusion is about regarding Main St. It’s really not very complicated, and as ‘mama’ said, at University, it’s the same as it was before.
OK, Jon, please tell me the reason and tell me if the change is getting the desired results–if the change in traffic patterns isn’t getting the desired results, why was all the money spent for the change?
Sharon: Because this is Peoria … and something is better than nothing?
Businesses along Main Street have told the city that their businesses have increased with the addition of on-street parking, and that was one of the goals. I also know from talking to college students that many students feel better knowing there is a buffer between them and the street as they walk along Main Street. Many students and employees of Campustown Shoppes eat at the Indian restaurant on Main. As they walk along Main there aren’t cars whizzing by at well above the speed limit, right on their heels. So the re-configuration has worked. Traffic has slowed down to its intended speed limit AND we have begun the transition to a Walkable West Bluff.
Yes, I was very concerned about the new traffic plan. But it’s gotten easier to deal with and I actually think it’s a better situation now than before. There are SOME times of the day the traffic is backed up a bit.
I understand about the traffic backups. Those aren’t any different than the backups near Target on War Drive or at the intersection of War Drive and University. It’s just that everyone expects a delay there and they haven’t had one at Main and University until now and don’t know how to handle the change, except to complain.
My wife recently went to the Costume Trunk for an item. She talked to the owner, Mr. Spain Senior, there and asked about the on street parking. He remarked that he has seen a significant increase in new customers, that has been directly attributable to the new on street parking.
It is my understanding that Mr Spain Senior was rather indifferent to the on street parking, to even being opposed, thinking it was wasteful. He has mentioned in the past that his customers are largely niche and they would find him wherever he might be, irregardless of the parking situation. He has even suggested he might relocate. He didn’t anticipate the changes benefiting him much.
Happily the on street parking has benefited him much more significantly. Maybe the younger Spain can take note of this.
Any idea when they are going to re stripe from Sheridan to North or down the hill?
It is my understanding that they won’t re-stripe those areas. That’s at least according to the mock-ups I’ve seen at meetings.
You all have convinced me that the change is working–if businesses are doing better that is a good thing. I definitely understand why having on the street parking going down the hill below Bourland is a good thing. Now if we could just make CampusTown safer that would be great!
I understand that the Bradley police are moving to Campustown, which ought to be a major crime deterent.
Conrad: That is big news. Was this announced at a neighborhood meeting?
Billy: I read it in the Bradley Scout.
Thanks. I forget to read the Scout. When did you see the article?